Search results

Hardly. Just cutting through some of the hype and bullshit surrounding his trip there. Nope. But he and his team sure sold his visit there as if it was a HUGE difference maker. Totally groundbreaking! Historical even! :facepalm:

Trump's "historic" trip to The Kingdom was obviously tremendously transformative lol

Makes complete sense and would likely have the outcome you envision. Not going to happen, though. And not baffling at all (imo) based on who we're talking about here. His ego won't allow him to admit any possibility that he won on anything other than strictly his own merits.

? So...we can ignore Trump's notably higher DR because both had high DRs (a negative) But we can trumpet Trump's slightly higher AR despite both having low ARs (a negative) How does that make sense? Seems highly illogical (and inconsistent) to me :shrug:

No need to mention his disapproval rating is considerably higher than Clinton's was at this point in time. Nah :-)

If it was up to me I'd leave those memorials up. Actually, slavery had been abolished in France in 1848, England in 1833, Spain in 1811 - so we were a bit behind the curve. Plus those three countries didn't have to engage in horrific civil wars to see its end.

Yeah sure, there's that too. Polygamy has also long outlasted Muhammed, and was not uncommon in his time. It can also be found in the Bible. Jacob. Abraham.

You mean for instance that slavery was still legal in the united states 1230 years after his death? Or that 1250 years after his death the age of consent in the United States was 10 or 12 in most states, and 7 in Delaware?

WTF does that have to do with what went on in New Jersey? :1orglaugh Are you saying Trump may have confused the two? That that's his excuse for being an ignorant, intransigent fuck who has never corrected or retracted his outrageously false statement? Please tell me that's not what you're...

Yeah actually he did, many a time. Trump spent the morning tweeting about the attack, calling for an end to political correctness when talking about terrorism and slamming London Mayor Sadiq Khan's comments to Londoners that there's no reason to be afraid and the city should go about its...

No we have not. And even in attempting to argue that we have you'd have to go back a whole lot further than 8 years. He did say "radical" or "extremist" and made it clear that it was rooted in their religion. Oh did he now? "This is not a battle between different faiths, different sects, or...

Yeah what about that? Wasn't that always THE key to breaking their backs? They're not saying it in Europe. :1orglaugh Trump didn't say it during his "I love myself" world tour either... As if it makes any fucking difference whatsoever. Jesus :facepalm: :facepalm:

:rofl: 0.2 percent of the population. :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:

Trump and Assad, standing together against the world. Such a beautiful romance :heart: So proud to be in such esteemed company. So pleased to let China and Russia assume a global leadership role in exerting soft power. God I love our president. Next up: getting rid of eurofag low flow toilets

C'mon people. A certain degree of attacking each other is probably to be expected in this sandbox, but attacking family is just plain wrong.

Damn. Hard to believe something like this could possibly happen. Women are never assaulted in the USA.

Well this turned out to be a pretty embarrassing thread. And I don't mean for France. Trump as a cartoon action figure :facepalm: (guy couldn't lift a minigun if his life depended on it) Macron a closeted gay (yeah we heard that stupid shit about Obama too) Trump was prettier than Macron in his...

That's not going to get us very far. Turmp has claimed that we spend “billions and billions” on NATO annually, but the Defense Department documents our annual direct contribution at under $500 million. Under 500 million, out of a total defense budget of over 600 billion. What can be labeled...

This one really fucked up the script...he's still wearing shoes

Liberals should be happy this morning. More dead Christians in Cairo LOL I hope this is only trolling. Because if it's serious, well...never mind...there's no point in even addressing it.

Disappointing for sure. Not once did he use the phrase "radical islamic terrorism" :brick: My prediction - and I admit it's a real longshot - is that before he returns home he'll forcibly push the NATO representative of a small country out of his way en route to a photo op.

"An overly sensitive person, incapable of dealing with any opinions that differ from their own. These people can often be seen lashing out on Twitter when anyone challenges their opinion." omg :1orglaugh Did they include a picture of Trump next to this definition? :1orglaugh

Bring it on. It's long past time Maverick and Ice consummated their homo erotic desire for each other.

Gateway

This incident could have been avoided had Trump only used the phrase "radical islamic terrorism" while visiting Riyadh. Instead he wussed out. He even made it very clear, like our last 2 presidents, that the war on terror is not a war on Islam. What a disappointment. What a feckless cuck...

It's true it really is a beautiful thing. The cockroach in chief never inspired us that way.

So your brother has had the means to shell out several hundreds of thousands of dollars over time, but you want others including those of lesser means to pay higher premiums to offset that? No. I brought him up to show how fucked up the system has been, and to highlight how impossible his...

:1orglaugh

He speaks in Trumpisms and it drives the leftwits nuts. lol Oh is that what we're calling his frequently rambling, semi-coherent, fact-impaired diatribes now? Trumpism? And it's actually an admirable thing? lol I think what leftwits find hardest to believe is that people of intelligence aren't...

Watergate 2.0 in Progress Very unlikely, imo Granted the so-called "optics" of this firing are not good, but unless Comey's replacement is someone who's obviously in Trump's pocket I imagine all will go forward as it would have with Comey, including the collusion-with-Russia investigation.

Nobody said anything was "settled". It isn't. But a lot of it rings logical. And...I see the WSJ sourced twice there. Isn't it generally one of your more acceptable sources?

LOL He has NO interest in trying to "diffuse" anything. He's a Putin toady from way back. A useful idiot. Putin floated the idea of Seagal becoming*an honorary Russian envoy to the United States. And in*November, Putin*granted Seagal Russian citizenship, personally handing*him a Russian...

a follow up to the original link from that thread: http://theweek.com/speedreads/658238/fbi-reopens-investigation-into-clintons-private-email-server Trump had been planning to oust Comey for at least a week, The New York Times and CNN report, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions had been charged...

Not clear to me being as the linked article heralded him as spearheading the reup. But no problem I'll take your word for it. That still leaves us with the collective "you" on the right reacting very much this way... Oh how you loved him when, with less than 2 weeks left before the election...

double post

Lot's of very pleased, upbeat, enthusiastic root tootin' goin' on in this thread you started about the subject. No doubt included him among the "patriots" you mentioned in your op. Also asserted: "She's [Clinton] pissed Comey off now. He has probably obtained preservation of evidence orders for...

lol Oh how you loved him when, with less than 2 weeks left before the election, he re-opened the Clinton email probe. THEN he was a courageous patriot, flaunting convention to get to THE TRUTH (which turned out to be nothing). Now he's a bum - nothing more than a "Obama fuckup" So predictable lol

Ah so Macron must have also promised to build a big beautiful wall another country will pay for. I did not know that, but I see the parallel here. Good point! :thumbsup:

Vive la libertie. Glad to see the French aren't as vulnerable to fear mongering as we are. They also have considerably higher percentage turnouts for their presidential elections than we do. 40% of newborn babies in France are already of ...(muslim) descent citation please? So far the only...

Being a shitty actor and a closeted homo wasn't enough, eh?

So apparently is inhumanity. At least when it comes to GOP legislators. Unimaginable that in the year 2017 we're the only modern industrial nation that let's its people suffer that way. And yet there are many who somehow consider that "winning" :facepalm:

I like how the 'artistically superb' photo that knocked Zemanova out of semi finals has gotten a whopping 1 vote (out of 13 now) for the silver medal. Too funny *lol* Here's a vote for Alyssa Arce to tie things up again.

That number comes from the CDC https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/overview/

Why? Because they didn't stand and clap like trained seals after every utterance he made? That's pretty much standard operating procedure for the minority party. Surely you're not referencing the debunked story that dems didn't stand for the navy seal's widow? At least I hope not.

So you certainly didn't condone this, correct?

Are you going to correct him on this, BC? Or just let it stand as an acceptable opinion from a foreigner?

Thanks very much dogoodvillian. I've had my eye on her too.

More highlights from Trump's last two days: Invites lunatic president of the Phillipines to visit Washington after having "a very friendly conversation" with him. Expressed how "honored" he'd be to meet with Kim Jong Un if it would be appropriate to do so. "People don't ask that question...