Well lookie here! President Trump's approval rating higher than Clinton's in 1993

[Jack Davenport]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/06/t...her-than-bill-clintons-at-same-point-in-term/


Wahahahahaha

Just as I predicted.

#Resistance

 

[Luxman]

Trump's approval rating has been going down steadily, and disapproval has gone up steadily, Obama had way better approval.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...ks-and-hits-a-point-that-obama-never-reached/

https://qz.com/889644/obamas-approval-rating-from-his-first-day-to-his-last-in-charts/

 

[Jack Davenport]

Trump's approval rating has been going down steadily, and disapproval has gone up steadily, Obama had way better approval.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...ks-and-hits-a-point-that-obama-never-reached/

https://qz.com/889644/obamas-approval-rating-from-his-first-day-to-his-last-in-charts/

And Reagan and GWB both enjoyed higher approvals than Obama.

If you are going to make statements about Trump's approval ratings, at least research them first.

http://m.rasmussenreports.com/publi...p_administration/trump_approval_index_history

His approval numbers have remained relatively steady because his base is immovable.

 

[Luxman]

 

[Jack Davenport]

That's job approval. Not overall approval, genius.

 

[bodie54]

No need to mention his disapproval rating is considerably higher than Clinton's was at this point in time.
Nah

 

[Jack Davenport]

No need to mention his disapproval rating is considerably higher than Clinton's was at this point in time.
Nah

No not really, considering that both Clinton and Trump had high negatives.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Yes, the point of the polls is his approval rating of his job as president.
What else would he be rated on???

Overall approval numbers indicate electability.

Not job approval numbers.

MAGA

 

[Luxman]

That's job approval. Not overall approval, genius.

Yes, the point of the polls is his approval rating of his job as president.
What else would he be rated on???

 

[Luxman]

Overall approval numbers indicate electability.

Not job approval numbers.

MAGA

The polls were taken after he was elected for his job rating.
His electability rating won't be an issue for 3 more years.
Taking electability polls now would be meaningless.

 

[Jack Davenport]

The polls were taken after he was elected for his job rating.
His electability rating won't be an issue for 3 more years.
Taking electability polls now would be meaningless.

Hey dipshit!

Overall numbers were all that counted before he was elected too. He had no job performance record to run on.

Overall approval has always been the metric.

Good god are you really that dense?

 

[bodie54]

No not really, considering that both Clinton and Trump had high negatives.

?
So...we can ignore Trump's notably higher DR because both had high DRs (a negative)
But we can trumpet Trump's slightly higher AR despite both having low ARs (a negative)
How does that make sense?
Seems highly illogical (and inconsistent) to me :shrug:

 

[Jack Davenport]

?
So...we can ignore Trump's notably higher DR because both had high DRs (a negative)
But we can trumpet Trump's slightly higher AR despite both having low ARs (a negative)
How does that make sense?
Seems highly illogical (and inconsistent) to me :shrug:

Why not?

You believe that Trump colluded with Russia and that Hillary Clinton would have made a good president.

Your logic was shot to hell some time ago.