Calm said:I agree on Dafoe and even Bent should have been called, IMO. Crouch is not bad at all, people have been dissing him when he started playing but he proved he can put the ball in the net.
England still has Gerrard and Lampard (most goal in Chelsea, impressive for a midfielder that has Drogba and Crespo in front of him); even if Eriksson "interrupts" Gerrard and Lampard with defensive instructions, they're still both capable of bombing from 30-40 meters (see Liverpool vs Westham).
Congrats on the cup, by the way, poggy. :hatsoff:
********** said:I think you're DEAD wrong about Cisse (watch him displace Trezeguet from the French starting 11 and score three or four)
********** said:I think you're wrong about Crouch (watch him come on and score at the World Cup), I think you're DEAD wrong about Cisse (watch him displace Trezeguet from the French starting 11 and score three or four), I think you're wrong about England not having anyone compared to those others... no-one in this tournament has a better squad than England, I think you're wrong about Gerrard as striker (he played the same position for Liverpool in some of their best victories), I think you're wrong about Defoe (Bent is much better and has played regularly) and I think you're wrong about Walcott (with his pace, why not gamble on him). Finally, I think you're wrong about who you support (Liverpool are better than Arsenal).
So as far as I'm concerned, your hope came true. You're really fucking wrong. If Holland or Italy don't win this World Cup, England will.
Fox
Calm said:If you want my 2 cents, Italy will win the cup, Argentina will be the disappointment of the year, England will lose in the semis at the last minutes, Ivory Coast will be the surprise of the year.