Should we add a model body rating?

Should we add a body rating?

  • Yes, great!

    Votes: 18 28.1%
  • No, lets not!

    Votes: 43 67.2%
  • No comment

    Votes: 3 4.7%

  • Total voters
    64

Ari Dee

Official Checked Star Member
I realize this is a porn site, but that would just reach a whole new level of tacky to me.

The problem with rating sites or rating features on sites is already that the majority of people will give perfect scores to girls they like, while angry trolls will downrate everyone else.

Rating body parts is just the most obscenely tacky thing I can imagine.
And it would make me want to leave FreeOnes, to be honest. I don't consider that fun or enjoyable in the least bit. Even if I was rated 5 out of 5 on everything, it would still feel degrading and just plain off-putting.
 
Last edited:

Vanilla Bear

Bears For Life
Sure why not? Let's add it and look where it leads to.

There will be some improving needed to do anyway. Start it as a beta. :thumbsup:
 
It's only a ratings game, not meant to be serious business, but the replies to this thread completely highlight the reservation of the idea.

I'm sure I've seen a similar thing on a paysite or two, I guess it's so the site can build an overall profile of which type of models to hire. The thing is models are viewed for their face and body, before personality is learned.

That's right about trolls, but I don't think there are enough trolls to make a rating dent into thousands of genuine users scores. I mean for the current babe ratings dashboard it doesn't happen, I can't recall seeing a model less than 4/5 stars. I've voted Kendra Lust 5star and score stayed at 4.62, it didn't even add .01 to it. It's going to take a lot of users to blast a score down. It's also right tho, people will give 5* across the board for anything to their favourites.

@Roald just an idea, maybe have a like click for each bodypart, any click will be equally positive and amount to a total, no-one can then attempt to bring a models score down. Tho, after the poll and responses, I think the bodypart voting idea may well now be scrapped. If the OSCM's & babes who are getting voted on don't like the idea, then it's probably best going back to the drawing board.

So far it's a unanimous decision 22-9 against.
 

GodsEmbryo

Closed Account
I don't think any model would like it when every part of her body was examined and judged like she was cattle on a cattle-market. Because that's what it is.

On top of that it's completely useless. Sure, some trolls might want to try to get the ratings down but there's also the other side of the coin: all the fans who give a top rating too their favorites no matter what body part. A model who is already high ranked in the FO ranking will most likely get high body ratings too. Secondly everyone changes over time. Maybe a girl changes her hair color and style, gets a little fatter or thinner, maybe she gets implants, etc. The ratings given will no longer be representative (if that was ever possible). And last but not least, do these ratings even matter for a viewer if he can use his own eyes to judge? I' m pretty sure everyone is looking at the pictures to find someone he likes, but wouldn't care much if girl so and so has a rating of 4.4 for her tits and 300 other girls have a 4.5. Because it's ALL the body parts that make the girl.

Maybe it's useful for a site owner who wants to get an idea of whom people find the most attractive, but not for a user.
 
The people rate girls and their body parts on the board already anyway so why not add the feature? :dunno:

Prevalence. Also, this would codify it. Essentially justify the action. It goes from being something some people do to being policy.

Beyond which, just because people do it doesn't mean it should be supported by the site. Some people do whippets to get high, that doesn't mean that it should listed under the directions on your whip cream can as a recommended use for the stuff.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
I have no idea what these gals are complaining about, Roald. They act like this idea would reduce them to nothing more than a collection of body parts and would make it seem like they were barely human. Just where do they get these crazy, radical thoughts?! Best to nip it in the bud now. Otherwise, the next thing ya know, they'll be demanding the right to vote and goodness knows what else! If it ever gets that bad, just contact my pal Sam Fisher and he'll handle them for ya. He knows a thing or two about keeping the women folk in line. :yesyes:

So go ahead and sign me up now. On the FreeOnes 1-10 scale, I'm giving Briana Lee's left nipple an 8 and the big toe on her right foot a 9. I have to mark her bottom lip and her ear lobes down to a 6 though - she didn't respond quickly enough to a question I asked her last week, so down she goes! :mad:


I just don't see what their objection is... :dunno:





P.S. If I get any PM's or rep messages where someone doesn't get this post, I will come to your house and beat your ass in front of your family, your dog and your local preacher.
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
It is a business decision. Freeones makes money from people that advertise on the site. Large and small. Companies and individuals. The draw to this mall is the variety of content. Will these ratings add to the bottom line? We already have rankings and reviews. Bios with body descriptions. Links to sample content. What more do I need?

Is this an idea to boost traffic? It would only be a marketing tool for a model to say,"Smile rated 5.0 by Freeones. Click this link." I just don't see any other plus side to this.

And remember that a vote for Briana's tits is half a vote for me.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
No really, I'm being serious....when I read the title and the first post I thought this was a joke. Like, "haha, Roald is trying to make a funny about all the dudes who spend 9 hrs a day critiquing pornstars on here" ...but this idea is actually SERIOUS?

Not that it matters because I'm not exactly eye candy for the gents around here and my presence would be no big deal to most of the posters on here, but if this concept gets implemented, I most definitely would leave. Its bad enough that there are a zillion threads ripping apart the physical qualities of women, judging "who's got the best this or that", right in the PRESENCE of the very women who Freeones prides themselves on having as part of this "community"....but to add a feature that encourages this kind of judgemental behaviour? For me personally, FO is a place where I can relax, hang out, and I know others feel the same. Its also the place where other models promote their work. Isn't it kind of backwards to have models posting their work only to support men potentially trashing these girls down? (don't act like trolls won't come out, and guys won't disrespect girls on purpose).

Seriously shaking my head right now. Who's idea WAS this?
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
And I should add that FO is supposed to be a place where fans can come and interact with models and pornstars...to make them more accessible and "real" (for lack of a better term)....adding a feature that would essentially hang each model up to be treated like a piece of meat, to have her appearance picked apart...just seems to show lack of class, and lack of respect for the models who spend their FREE time on here trying to make FO less of a sausage fest. I get that pornstars are in an industry where physical appearance is important, and everyone has their preferences....but everyone on here already KNOWS what they like or dislike about particular models. Adding this option would only be giving horrible men the venue to voice it in front of our faces IMO.
 
This is more degrading to ocsms than helpful to fans, IMO. It's bad enough seeing scumbags trash girls in the comments section because they're a little thicker or dyed their hair.

We appreciate the effort to improve, but this is regression on the ocsm front.
 
This is more degrading to ocsms than helpful to fans, IMO.

But... it's not even helpful to fans. This stuff is subjective anyways. So it's a double fail.

All it succeeds at doing is offering people the chance to vote for stuff, which they do like, but doesn't really balance out all the misogyny.

And I should add that FO is supposed to be a place where fans can come and interact with models and pornstars...to make them more accessible and "real" (for lack of a better term)....adding a feature that would essentially hang each model up to be treated like a piece of meat, to have her appearance picked apart...just seems to show lack of class, and lack of respect for the models who spend their FREE time on here trying to make FO less of a sausage fest. I get that pornstars are in an industry where physical appearance is important, and everyone has their preferences....but everyone on here already KNOWS what they like or dislike about particular models. Adding this option would only be giving horrible men the venue to voice it in front of our faces IMO.

Yes, there's an "ew" factor, and it's pretty easy and reasonable to see why someone would be upset by this. I'd offer you a virtual e-hug in an effort to console, but I feel that would be untoward. So here, have a virtual e-cookie instead.
 
Top