How do you figure? The Lakers give up 2 All-Stars, one being the reigning 6th man of the year for an All-Star PG. This trade, IMO, favored the Hornets more so than anyone else involved. The Hornets get 3 fantastic, established players in Odom, Scola and Kevin Maritn, they get an up and coming Steve-Nash-type PG in Dragic and a 1st round draft pick in the 2012 draft. Consider that if they don't end up going through with this trade that, ultimately, the Hornets will receive an underwhelmed, unmotivated Chris Paul for 66 games, and then he walks at the end of this season and the Hornets get nothing.
On par, the Hornets were actually getting the best end of this deal. I don't really understand how anyone can argue differently. It just doesn't make any sense. The "competitive balance" of the league will suffer without this trade. Martin, Scola, Odom, Dragic and Emeka Okafor seem like a pretty tough starting 5 to me. Now you get a less than satisfied, ********* player in Chris Paul and other than that, Okafor and Trevor Ariza are the only players on that team that are not free agents that are worth anything. Silly.