Really well did you live in Alabama, Arkansas, Mississisppi, or South Carolina? Yeah because Thats all people care about is their college football because they have no professional teams..
Read the post. I didn't say they don't care about college football. I said they don't all care about the SEC which was the exact claim you made.
Gatorade? This is where Gatorade was invented you know.
And this has what relevance to the subject?
Your the one complaining about how the SEC will be on all these markets. Well you just answered your own question. DONT WATCH IT then if its so bad. Nothing is being crammed down anybodys throat so quit whining!
Your reading comprehension skills must not be very good. I never said it wasn't good (I watch lots of SEC football). Overall, it's
very good.....as I already said 3 times now,
the best overall talent in the country. It does give me pause to know, however, that there is a national network in addition to CBS that is going to focus on the conference.....that's what I said. Go back and read it. I've worked in the media and I can tell you a national TV network will not survive long with states like Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi and South Carolina as their base.
LOL not a dynasty.. LOL SO why has the SEC won the most championships since The BCS system was put into place? and 3 years in a row..... What was the last conference to do that. Make that 4 because I guarantee If we don't do it this year one of the other teams will from our conference. Everybody is tired of seeing Ohio State/Gatorbait in a title every year getting their ass handed to them. Add Oklahoma to that list too!
You seem to think that college football was invented with the BCS. Here are some statistics for you to consider, Jason:
Top 10 NCAA Division I (now called FBS) poll champions of all time and the number of championships they have won:
Notre Dame-12
Alabama-11
USC-10
Michigan-7
Oklahoma-7
Minnesota-6
Pittsburgh-6
Miami(FL), Nebraska, Ohio State-5
Army, Georgia Tech, Illinois, Texas, Tennessee-4
Seems to be pretty spread out to me (4 conferences dominant....):
Big 10-22
Big 12-16
SEC-15
Pac 10-10
Champions since 2000:
2000-Oklahoma
2001-Miami
2002-Ohio State
2003-LSU/USC shared (what a joke!)
2004-USC
2005-Texas
2006-Florida
2007-LSU
2008-Florida
So, again, for 3 years the SEC has walked off with the mythical national title. Great job....I give them their props, justly due. Hardly a dynasty however.
As I said in my original post, a national TV network needs a broad base of viewers in order to survive. They're taking a huge risk by competing with CBS (and ESPN and the Fox regional networks as well) in this regard. Although I feel pretty certain that you probably don't lower yourself to watching anything other than SEC football, most of the other fans across the nation would rather see their teams (usually based on regional preferences as Andronicus pointed out) than some second-tier SEC matchup (which is all this network is likely to get since I am sure that CBS gets their pick of games each week).
It amazes me that fans like you simply refuse to admit that anyone is worthy of consideration for respect other than your own team or conference. If that were true, why bother playing them? Indeed, what meaning does it really have if your team or conference beats a team that is from a vastly inferior conference?
There's a great quote from the movie
Jeremiah Johnson where Grizzly Adams (Will Geer) tells Jeremiah (Robert Redford) that there is an old Crow Indian saying.....
"A man is judged by how mighty his enemies be". If the SEC's enemies are all weaklings, what does that say about them?
I stand by my original assertion that your initial reply to my post was ignorant and arrogant. Your follow-up did nothing to change my mind. From the general consensus of replies from the other posters, they would seem to agree with me.