Odd how they don't comment that it was a robbery, especially since all civilian deaths were bank employees. Also, don't banks have armed guards in the US?5 dead (plus a neutralized ********) in Louisville.
Premium Link Upgrade
And we're just into April. So at this rate we're easily on track for 500+There have been 146 mass shootings in the U.S. so far this year, according to data compiled by the Premium Link Upgrade .
Because it's easier that explain who, what, or why, and it's a way to inflame the masses, for certain entities to achieve their goal of disarming a lawful populace. Just so you know, the common response when you bring up why you don't blame a car, for a ***** driving death, is their ever favorite, "cars weren't designed to **** people".Why is an act of mass ****** dismissed as *** ********? Seems to remove a certain amount of accountability from the human being while putting more weight and responsibility on an inanimate object.
Because it's easier that explain who, what, or why, and it's a way to inflame the masses, for certain entities to achieve their goal of disarming a lawful populace. Just so you know, the common response when you bring up why you don't blame a car, for a ***** driving death, is their ever favorite, "cars weren't designed to **** people".
Does anyone with half a brain believe a *** has evil intent? Kinda like banning books. The book doesn’t hurt anyone, yet it seems to scare plenty of citizens.Putting enough consistent blame on guns every single day while changing around words and terminology confuses people making them believe the *** has the evil intent instead of the human being firing it. I predict one day a *** will be perp-walked in front of concerned but cheering citizens.
I would suggest because a *** is used and it is violent. Who is dismissing it? The only people I see dismissing it are those who try to blame it on side doors or suggest there is no viable solution. (Not referring to anyone posting here.)Why is an act of mass ****** dismissed as *** ********? Seems to remove a certain amount of accountability from the human being while putting more weight and responsibility on an inanimate object.
Because it wasn’t a robbery? It appears to have been a workplace dispute.Odd how they don't comment that it was a robbery,
Not really. Some branches may, but I haven’t seen a security guard in a branch for years.especially since all civilian deaths were bank employees. Also, don't banks have armed guards in the US?
Does anyone with half a brain believe a *** has evil intent? Kinda like banning books. The book doesn’t hurt anyone, yet it seems to scare plenty of citizens.
I would suggest because a *** is used and it is violent. Who is dismissing it? The only people I see dismissing it are those who try to blame it on side doors or suggest there is no viable solution. (Not referring to anyone posting here.)
Politicians doing this aren’t better.A *** cannot form evil intent anymore than it can decide to be violent. Words and terminology matter and they are not accidental. Even "gang ********" is dismissed as *** ******** in the news. Maybe not someone with half a brain but plenty of people with pea brains that froth at the mouth over the object and ignore the person behind the action. Politicians also have an easier time holding objects responsible as opposed to pointing fingers at potential voters and their families who are also potential voters.
Quite the assumptions there. Why do presume people who disagree with you are not thinking for themselves?Another thing... we need to stay together and quit separating ourselves into our political camps. As long as politicians are able to divide us, they keep us at each others' throats, and are allowed to do nothing then encouraged even more to do nothing if they get re-elected. The guy I voted for laughs behind my back as well as the guy you voted for laughs behind your back too. If you want anything done, we as citizens need to speak to each other. Both sides have good ideas as well as bad ones. We need to group and combine the good ones then, as a unified *****, march up to our public servants and demand they take action or lose their jobs. Aren't you tired of being someone else's livestock that can be convinced to live inside of your own slaughterhouse?
Quite the assumptions there. Why do presume people who disagree with you are not thinking for themselves?
You are saying that someone who believes mental health reform combined with *** control laws is ‘livestock’? As you requested earlier from another poster, please provide the statistical evidence to support your assertion.Why would anyone choose a result that breeds crime on their own unless they were tricked and sold a bag of goods?
You are saying that someone who believes mental health reform combined with *** control laws is ‘livestock’? As you requested earlier from another poster, please provide the statistical evidence to support your assertion.
Aren't you tired of being someone else's livestock that can be convinced to live inside of your own slaughterhouse?
Right. You also said this: