We don't have to read your mind. It's bad enough that we have to read what you post.
So, you're still reading my mind and assuming things on, "Kennedy said the whole thing's unconstitutional.
Kennedy. What's that tell you?"
Believe me, I know not to assume political bent based on a person's name. I mean just look at Reagan's son. That apple fell
far from the tree. And I know of Carters that are in no way related to a certain, well-known failure, whose second term is being served by the current President.
My comment of, "Aside from telling me that even someone on the left like Kennedy can see it for what it is and that the government has no authority there," came from a different post, made
after the, "Kennedy said the whole thing's unconstitutional.
Kennedy. What's that tell you?" comment and in response to something else. So you can't really connect the two like you're trying to do, to say from the start that I assumed he's on the left because of his name or even that in my first comment that I was saying he was on the left, as I did not mention Kennedy and the left together in any way in that first post.
You assumed that because I'm on the right, that I must be trying to say Kennedy's on the left (for whatever reason you'd like to subscribe to), when I had made no statement to that effect yet. If I had said that
before the first post, or as part of, yeah you could
more easily make that connection, but it would still be a stretch. But after? No. So, you wanna try that again?
And (at this writing) you still haven't answered my question as to accusations I've supposedly made about you. We wanna back these up so there could possibly be a response, or just let the seriousness of the charge fight your battle instead of the nature of the evidence? I wanna know what I supposedly did. Show me, or retract your statement. Or I'll find you more amusing than I already do.
And like another post, since we are still on this thread,
I WILL NOT COMPLY