Aside from telling me that even someone on the left like Kennedy can see it for what it is and that the government has no authority there, it tells me that a few people picked by a few other people decided what was right for the rest of us, instead of it being a personal decision based on what we really need. They could have just as easily decided it was a good idea for everyone to bash their heads in. Or how about everyone, no matter their age, must not only own a gun, it must be an M16 with a grenade launcher, and must keep it loaded, off safe, and on you at all times? Because after all, it's for your protection. And if you didn't, to jail. (I bet those on the left would
love that) Or a anti-tank missile? Or an aircraft carrier? Or that we should all eat peanuts, even if you're allergic.
I laugh at your assertion that the court is conservative. It is progressive. If it were truly conservative, it would have been struck down.
Despite what people on the left like to claim about 'evolving interpretations of a living document to fit the times,' it is not a 'living' document that can die, it is
'eternal.' To be read as it was written, no interpretations needed, and if we wanted to change something, we could amend it. Only that has the nasty little problem of requiring 3/4 of the states to ratify it.
And on a side note about the owning a gun, they put in the Constitution that we all have a right to bear arms for protection and other things. They could have just as easily
required us all to have guns for the same reason. They did not. I don't know about you, but I kinda think that if anyone knew what they meant, it was those who wrote it in the first place. It's a good idea for you to have a gun to protect yourself, but they didn't make you.
I WILL NOT COMPLY, and I'll take my chances in the internment camp with my fellow patriotic Americans. If they can keep us in that is