• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Irish Slavery

Luxman

#TRE45ON

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
My Best friend is 100% Irishman....and you'll never meet a more honest, trustworthy, or loyal person ever. I've also seen him kick 3 guys asses and beg for more! He would walk 10 miles past a BP station, to the next company, to fill up an emergency can, if his car ran out of gas.
 

Harpsman

Light one for Me
All very true. The British (English) did plunder the world and did a lot of bad - as imperialists did.

Alas, history can't be rewritten. We should never forget. But we can't let it ruin our today or the future.

Peace & Love :)
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
That was a very interesting and worthwhile read. Thanks! I would rep you but the system won't let me.
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
Don't misunderstand me: i love English people. I've lived in London for many years, i've got biz, many friends and lovers there. But it is a fact that everything that has been touched by the Empire has gone rotten. Look where there is war, turmoils and terrorism in the world and check if by any chance that place was a colony of the Empire.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
it's the past

Yes, and while it's not good to dwell on the past, it does help us to understand certain current events... or the basis for certain issues we see in the world today. I'm not a true student of history, but I've always tried to learn as much as I could about certain historical periods (mostly ancient Rome). I had NO idea that this ever took place. I would say that most other people didn't know that the Irish were treated this way by the English either. At least here in the U.S., we're taught that slavery was strictly race based. And though I learned that that was not true, I had to learn that on my own (years after high school). Race based slavery was something that Europeans came up with in the 1700's. Prior to that, going back to the time of the Romans and well before, slavery was more based on territorial disputes, cultural differences and military conquests. The Romans did not see the Greeks as "barbarians"... because they spoke Greek. Anyone who did not speak Greek or Latin was considered a barbarian. In polite society, upper class Romans usually spoke Greek, not Latin (kind of like how some Americans have a fondness for speaking French). But when Rome defeated Greece in a series of wars between 214 BC and 148 BC, Rome brought back captured Greeks as slaves. So we know that slavery has existed for a very long time - and it was not race based. Within the Roman empire, there were many free people (though not always citizens) of a great many ethnic and racial groups. But notice that while an African could become a Roman general, an Irish papist would not fare so well in the British military 2000 years later.

What's interesting (to me) about this thread is that the English seemed to be on an extermination campaign against the Irish papists - and those negative feelings persist today in Northern Ireland. And all this stems from a crazy, horny English king who wanted a divorce so he could marry his mistress - so he created a new religion that he was the head of, since the Pope wouldn't grant him a divorce. Many English people continue to believe (the lie) that the English monarch is God's representative on Earth and was divinely chosen.

It's the past. But you can learn from it. That's how my country was formed. The Founding Fathers were all students of the Greco-Roman classics. And from that reading, they developed the concept of a modern people's republic. Why do you think every original building in Washington, D.C looks like it was lifted from ancient Rome? ;)
 
Don't misunderstand me: i love English people. I've lived in London for many years, i've got biz, many friends and lovers there. But it is a fact that everything that has been touched by the Empire has gone rotten.

Like Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Hong Kong...The US.
 
I did my senior thesis on the Irish plantation period... So this is something I'm familiar with. Thanks for the post, brought back a flood of memories
 

larss

I'm watching some specialist videos
Many English people continue to believe (the lie) that the English monarch is God's representative on Earth and was divinely chosen.

That's the first I've EVER heard this and I have lived in England most of my life and in my younger days as a churchgoing Anglican. The English monarch is the head of the Anglican church and has nothing to do with being chosen by God.
 
Yes, and while it's not good to dwell on the past, it does help us to understand certain current events... or the basis for certain issues we see in the world today. I'm not a true student of history, but I've always tried to learn as much as I could about certain historical periods (mostly ancient Rome). I had NO idea that this ever took place. I would say that most other people didn't know that the Irish were treated this way by the English either. At least here in the U.S., we're taught that slavery was strictly race based. And though I learned that that was not true, I had to learn that on my own (years after high school). Race based slavery was something that Europeans came up with in the 1700's. Prior to that, going back to the time of the Romans and well before, slavery was more based on territorial disputes, cultural differences and military conquests. The Romans did not see the Greeks as "barbarians"... because they spoke Greek. Anyone who did not speak Greek or Latin was considered a barbarian. In polite society, upper class Romans usually spoke Greek, not Latin (kind of like how some Americans have a fondness for speaking French). But when Rome defeated Greece in a series of wars between 214 BC and 148 BC, Rome brought back captured Greeks as slaves. So we know that slavery has existed for a very long time - and it was not race based. Within the Roman empire, there were many free people (though not always citizens) of a great many ethnic and racial groups. But notice that while an African could become a Roman general, an Irish papist would not fare so well in the British military 2000 years later.

What's interesting (to me) about this thread is that the English seemed to be on an extermination campaign against the Irish papists - and those negative feelings persist today in Northern Ireland. And all this stems from a crazy, horny English king who wanted a divorce so he could marry his mistress - so he created a new religion that he was the head of, since the Pope wouldn't grant him a divorce. Many English people continue to believe (the lie) that the English monarch is God's representative on Earth and was divinely chosen.

It's the past. But you can learn from it. That's how my country was formed. The Founding Fathers were all students of the Greco-Roman classics. And from that reading, they developed the concept of a modern people's republic. Why do you think every original building in Washington, D.C looks like it was lifted from ancient Rome? ;)

What a crazy statement. England is one of the least religious places in the world. I doubt you'll find "many" people under the age of 100 who would make such a claim.
 
Yes, and while it's not good to dwell on the past, it does help us to understand certain current events... or the basis for certain issues we see in the world today. I'm not a true student of history, but I've always tried to learn as much as I could about certain historical periods (mostly ancient Rome). I had NO idea that this ever took place. I would say that most other people didn't know that the Irish were treated this way by the English either. At least here in the U.S., we're taught that slavery was strictly race based. And though I learned that that was not true, I had to learn that on my own (years after high school). Race based slavery was something that Europeans came up with in the 1700's. Prior to that, going back to the time of the Romans and well before, slavery was more based on territorial disputes, cultural differences and military conquests. The Romans did not see the Greeks as "barbarians"... because they spoke Greek. Anyone who did not speak Greek or Latin was considered a barbarian. In polite society, upper class Romans usually spoke Greek, not Latin (kind of like how some Americans have a fondness for speaking French). But when Rome defeated Greece in a series of wars between 214 BC and 148 BC, Rome brought back captured Greeks as slaves. So we know that slavery has existed for a very long time - and it was not race based. Within the Roman empire, there were many free people (though not always citizens) of a great many ethnic and racial groups. But notice that while an African could become a Roman general, an Irish papist would not fare so well in the British military 2000 years later.

What's interesting (to me) about this thread is that the English seemed to be on an extermination campaign against the Irish papists - and those negative feelings persist today in Northern Ireland. And all this stems from a crazy, horny English king who wanted a divorce so he could marry his mistress - so he created a new religion that he was the head of, since the Pope wouldn't grant him a divorce. Many English people continue to believe (the lie) that the English monarch is God's representative on Earth and was divinely chosen.

It's the past. But you can learn from it. That's how my country was formed. The Founding Fathers were all students of the Greco-Roman classics. And from that reading, they developed the concept of a modern people's republic. Why do you think every original building in Washington, D.C looks like it was lifted from ancient Rome? ;)


well in my country our ,,beloved,, prime minister thinks he's alexander the great and is pushing the people into some things they don't want. in my opinion history is usefull only for scientific purposes otherwise it's all bullshit. it's full of mysteries that someone is using against someone else today. i live in a country where history has influence and sadly negative the most. actual macedonians are slavic people that moved here in 7th century, but they are trying to prove that have roots from ancient macedonians, total insanity and bullshit. and talking of the english, they always ruled with the wales, scotland and ireland, but today i believe it's different, tho northern ireland has still issues.
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
it's the past

Tell that to an Irishman, and he'll buy you a shot of Jamison's.....then kick the shit out of you.

Those who forget the past, are doomed to repeat it...and you sure as hell wouldn't say that about the atrocities committed by the Nazi's, against the Jew's in WWII, would you? I mean, it is in the past.
 
Tell that to an Irishman, and he'll buy you a shot of Jamison's.....then kick the shit out of you.

Those who forget the past, are doomed to repeat it...and you sure as hell wouldn't say that about the atrocities committed by the Nazi's, against the Jew's in WWII, would you? I mean, it is in the past.

well nowadays the israelis became for the palestinians same as what nazis were to them, that's why past is important, maybe i explained this too complicated, i was saying mysteries from the past are being abused nowadays from governments. I just hope there would be peace between the brits and the irish, same for the israelis and palestinians.
 
Top