Status
Not open for further replies.
that quote from Einstein doesn't prove he is a man of religion at all.


As I already stated, Einstein was a self-professed Man of God. The pantheist religion / philosophy of Albert Einstein is that All is One and Interconnected (Nature, God), of which we humans are an inseparable part.

"…The most beautiful and most profound experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead. To know that what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their primitive forms - this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of true religiousness..."
( Albert Einstein - The Merging of Spirit and Science)

"...Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source . . . They are creatures who can't hear the music of the spheres..." (The Expanded Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press, 2000 p. 214)
 
Amazing, even after I said this is his you would approach my post, by cherry picking a bit that suits your rapidly failing argument, you still go an do it.

You really are are a narrow minded, spineless cunt Eric.
 
Amazing, even after I said this is his you would approach my post, by cherry picking a bit that suits your rapidly failing argument, you still go an do it.

You really are are a narrow minded, spineless cunt Eric.

You are 100% wrong, and you have no point.
 
My point, cunt, was made in my last post about Einstein's quote does not prove he is a man of god at all. But you chose ignore that and throw a few more meaningless quotes around as if they somehow validate your argument but they don't. You still avoid answering anyone who questions you cos you are a coward.
 
THAT QUOTE FROM EINSTIEN DOES NOT MEAN HE IS A MAN OF GOD, IT SIMPLY MEANS THAT RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE HIDES BEHIND WHAT SCIENCE HAS 'YET TO PROVE'.

Is that a clear enough point for you cunt?
 
THAT QUOTE FROM EINSTIEN DOES NOT MEAN HE IS A MAN OF GOD, IT SIMPLY MEANS THAT RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE HIDES BEHIND WHAT SCIENCE HAS 'YET TO PROVE'.

Is that a clear enough point for you cunt?

Wrong, it is a well-known fact of historical record that Einstein was a man of God. Your interpretation of Einsteins' quotes is erroneous, and for you to even think to dispute patently obvious historical facts just because you are some pathetic pillow-biting atheist, just shows how stupid and desperate you really are. lol
 
"... The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These subtilised interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."

Albert Einstien. January 1954
 
Again, it is common knowledge that Einstein believed in the pantheistic God of Spinoza as opposed to an anthropomorphic or personal God…Something I said 2 fucking pages ago…Get a fucking clue, idiot, and stop wasting my time.

"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals Himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp (The Open Court Publishing Co., La Salle, Illinois, Third Edition, 1970) pp. 659 - 660.

I have not found a better expression than 'religious' for the trust in the rational nature of reality that is, at least to a certain extent, accessible to human reason." G. S. Viereck, Glimpses of the Great (Macauley, New York, 1930)

"... The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These subtilised interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."

Albert Einstien. January 1954
 
Eric and Chopper are flip sides of the same coin, and its monopoly money
 
I have no problem in saying that our politicians are thieves and the city's been running poorly, it's true
 
I am certainly not trying to convince you of anything. Like I said, you were a godless idiot when you came into to this thread, and I'm sure you are determined to stay that way no matter what, so my energy is wasted discussing an issue to which you already have a predetermined opinion.

You think you are so smart, then, like I said, start your own "Religion is dumb, God is bad" thread, espouse your "brilliant" arguments, and wee'll see how that works out for you.

godless idiot? Well, I certainly don't need to say religious idiot given it's pretty redundant. Everybody has a predetermined opinion going into a discussion, moron. It's not my fault that your arguments have failed in convincing me to believe in your (or any) myths. There are plenty of "religion is dumb, god is bad" threads and I'm doing just fine expressing my opinions on your thread. No reason to make more threads on something so obvious as religion is bad. Like in the outside world, the religious make ridiculous claims, and non-believers address them.
 
Einstein clearly was a man of God, this thread is about speaking of God in a positive light and exposing the snares of the Devil. I have been very clear about the distinction between God and religion and about christianity, even in your quote I made that distinction clear, so what are you talking about ?


I'm not going to even get into the Hitler discussion again when you seem determined to ignore the plethora of documentaries and other information on the subject.

Same thing regarding NDE experiences, the distinction between hallucinations vs brain-dead individuals clinically deternined to be dead has already been discussed.


You are merely re-stating your same objections, and not doing it very well.

You're stupid ass is taking credit from a guy that applied god to nature and saying that that supports your brand of myths. You ignored my point about him not applying any doctrine to his teachings but we all know how much of a coward you are. You haven't provided any valid arguments for NDE or Hitler. You expects others to be as gullible as you and when they're not, you call them stupid. You're a master in hypocrisy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top