Status
Not open for further replies.

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
ESA: Is the Universe finite or infinite?
Joseph Silk: We don't know. The expanding Universe theory says that the Universe could expand forever [that corresponds to a 'flat' Universe]. And that is probably the model of the Universe that we feel closest to now. But it could also be finite, because it could be that the Universe has a very large volume now, but finite, and that that volume will increase, so only in the infinite future will it actually be infinite.

ESA: It sounds like a game of words, is it?
Joseph Silk: No. We do not know whether the Universe is finite or not. To give you an example, imagine the geometry of the Universe in two dimensions as a plane. It is flat, and a plane is normally infinite. But you can take a sheet of paper [an 'infinite' sheet of paper] and you can roll it up and make a cylinder, and you can roll the cylinder again and make a torus [like the shape of a doughnut]. The surface of the torus is also spatially flat, but it is finite. So you have two possibilities for a flat Universe: one infinite, like a plane, and one finite, like a torus, which is also flat.
 
Dumbass go Google Mariah Milano is an idiot. One of the most brilliant men that I have ever met in my life is a former Russian Physics professor who I I had the honor of being a student in his physics class at UNC. he also happens to be a Christian and succinctly explained that the matter and energy in the universe is generally considered to be closed which means to your 8th grade ass that it limited. It is called the 1st law of thermodynamics and is a source of head scratching for many atheist scientists. I am willing to bet that Rattrap will acknowledge this to some degree. You are showing your ignorance as usual.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
he is in the 5% of scientists who are christians and sorry dude but Joesph Silk is considered to be one of the leading Astronomers in the WORLD. Carl Sagan was an atheist and til his last moment never changed that belief.. And what about Neil deGrasse Tyson? He is considered a leader in his field and says all of that finite stuff is merely crap cooked up by christians to attempt to discredit real science. Ill take his theory over your brilliant professor all fucking day long dude.

And you also believe the tiny % of scientists who say climate change isn't real too right? So your guy says one thing and a huge majority of scientists say another but you believe your guy because he subscribes to the same batishit fairy tale that you do. What a shock.

and you can keep pointing out my education level but that is a huge compliment to me. I am proud of my accomplishments on such a limited education. It makes me more proud and more determined. And my son goes to a top 10 school in the US so you can say it all you want, I LOVE it.

Your guy says one thing while the rest of science says another. I'll take Joseph Silk all day long. you lose again counselor.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
I love it that a guy who boasts about his education, his experiences with brilliant people, his life as an accomplished hard ass attorney that brags how he is known to dominate people to tears spends his free time posting on a fucking porn site message board. And not only do you post, you get your pussy hurt and storm off vowing to return to your morality in line with your christian horseshit theology only to return a few weeks later.

You wanna take shots at my education, You Might wanna take an inventory of your own life there dude. For all your school and accomplishments and the wonderful bright people you know you're here with the rest of us uneducated losers. What does that say about YOU?
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
here's the Wiki page for Joseph Silk. Let's see your brilliant professor's bio and resume please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Silk

last thing before I go to bed what does it feel like to be on the same side of an issue as this ass hat eric? that HAS to suck donkey cock. but there you are together. first it was philbert now it's eric. great company you keep dude lol
 
See you can only quote scientists. I actually was a student of them. And what is even more high hilarity is that which you are referencing isn't even
what I have been talking about. What Silk and Sagan were discussing where the limits of the uniuerse not what makes it up . Please keep going with your frantic Google searches to try to appear you have a fucking clue on the topic which is obvious to all of us now that you don't. This is about matter and energy not universal boundaries. It's not about Worm Holes or bending space and time. You are a wannabe intellectual who wasted her life away doing something that you probably hate yourself for. Nobody is this combative or boastful unless they are overcompensating for something. I hope for your son's sake that he receives the education that he seeks. And has somehow been shielded from the possible teasing and taunting he will receives if his friends find out what mom used to do for a living. As for my participation here that is my fucking business. If any logs are kept here by admins they will show that i sigs turned off and i have to click on attachments to view and the only forums I visit here are sports politics and the occasional thread I post on talk about music. I may compliment the OCSM's occasionally . So in a nut shell go stick a red hot branding iron up your twat. ok Trixie?
 
he is in the 5% of scientists who are christians

That is a lie, and 100% wrong. The majority of the world's greatest scientific thinkers throughout history have been men of God. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_thinkers_in_science Mariah is a perfect example of why a bad education is worse than no education at all. No matter how much money she makes in life, she will still always be a no-class blithering idiot.


The Majority of The World's Most Famous Scientists Believed in God


Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)

Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and urged Copernicus to publish it around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Bacon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, "It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity." (Of Atheism)

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, and saw his system as an alternate interpretation of the biblical texts.

Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Roman Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences - can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted to see was that his philosophy be adopted as standard Roman Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.

Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
Pascal was a French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer and theologian. In mathematics, he published a treatise on the subject of projective geometry and established the foundation for probability theory. Pascal invented a mechanical calculator, and established the principles of vacuums and the pressure of air. He was raised a Roman Catholic, but in 1654 had a religious vision of God, which turned the direction of his study from science to theology. Pascal began publishing a theological work, Lettres provinciales, in 1656. His most influential theological work, the Pensées ("Thoughts"), was a defense of Christianity, which was published after his death. The most famous concept from Pensées was Pascal's Wager. Pascal's last words were, "May God never abandon me."

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God was essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gases, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, 'for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels...' As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.

Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday was the son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but led to much of our lifestyles today, which depends on them (including computers and telephone lines and, so, web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. Originating from Presbyterians, the Sandemanians rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.

Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was notable for formation of the X-Club, which was dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science while, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.

William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered many areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities, which recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, who was certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).

Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
I actually have been sick all week with the chickenpox and have been watching discovery channel and history channel and different things on TV one being an interview with Joesph Silk about his life's work and his views looking back at 70 years old. Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard and so on. Where did your Russian genius study?

And YOU said the universe is finite, now you are saying that isn't what you said? here's your quote "This universe has certain absolutes and that is that the amount of energy and mass it holds is finite."

I can quote scientists yes, you were a student and yet don't believe the vast majority who all agree climate change is very real and very dangerous? You quote your brilliant teacher who's opinion is different than that of someone who is considered to be the leader in the WORLD on this subject. Yes I quote them just as you do. Are YOU a scientist? No, you are an ambulance chaser who brags on a porn site about how feared he is in the courtroom.

And yes it is your business, but from where you sit you are hardly someone to pass judgment and insult someone's limited education. 6393 posts??? really??? just in a music thread? You have double the posts I do and I make money from doing this and about 1500 posts of mine have been in the last few months. Own up dude, this is your social life.

Face it dude, you're the only person who thinks so highly of yourself. Otherwise you'd have a lot more on your plate than to post on a porn site about ANYTHING 6400 times, especially arguing about the existence of god and and science with an uneducated porn whore.

My son's high school costs as much a year as your college alma mater. Unless you realy went to some Mexican law school and are just fancy-ing it up for us loser porn site trolls. And his mom with her 8th grade education and all pays for it.
 
That is a lie, and 100% wrong. The majority of the world's greatest scientific thinkers throughout history have been men of God. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_thinkers_in_science Mariah is a perfect example of why a bad education is worse than no education at all. No matter how much money she makes in life, she will still always be a no-class blithering idiot.


The Majority of The World's Most Famous Scientists Believed in God


Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)

Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and urged Copernicus to publish it around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Bacon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, "It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity." (Of Atheism)

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, and saw his system as an alternate interpretation of the biblical texts.

Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Roman Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences - can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted to see was that his philosophy be adopted as standard Roman Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.

Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
Pascal was a French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer and theologian. In mathematics, he published a treatise on the subject of projective geometry and established the foundation for probability theory. Pascal invented a mechanical calculator, and established the principles of vacuums and the pressure of air. He was raised a Roman Catholic, but in 1654 had a religious vision of God, which turned the direction of his study from science to theology. Pascal began publishing a theological work, Lettres provinciales, in 1656. His most influential theological work, the Pensées ("Thoughts"), was a defense of Christianity, which was published after his death. The most famous concept from Pensées was Pascal's Wager. Pascal's last words were, "May God never abandon me."

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God was essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gases, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, 'for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels...' As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.

Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday was the son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but led to much of our lifestyles today, which depends on them (including computers and telephone lines and, so, web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. Originating from Presbyterians, the Sandemanians rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.

Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was notable for formation of the X-Club, which was dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science while, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.

William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered many areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities, which recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, who was certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).

Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."


Giblets
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
eric has no balls at all. none. he has balls in his mouth sometimes, but none of his own. balls slap his buttocks from time to time, and his chin as well. But none to call his own. And Chopper you are absolutely correct, eric is a creature and he is a moron off the charts. I haven't seen anything he's posted in a few pages but I would guess it's a lot of copy n paste quotes, nonsense youtube videos that don't make his case at all and other conspiracy shit.

See eric, no one even needs to see your posts to know what you would say. you are so dumb and basic it's predictable.
 
Mariah you ignorant slut! I am on record as saying that climate change is real so go fuck yourself! I said that the amount of energy and mass the universe contains is finite. It never decreases or increases. Even the scientists you mention wouldn't dispute it because it is scientific law. Of course no one expect you to know any better. I used to think you possessed a little gray matter but the more you post here the dumber you look. I may have the social life of a recluse or I may party like Charlie Sheen but the beautiful thing is that you will never know for certain. I manage to average 5 or 6 posts a day over 5 years. Hardly taking up a great deal of my time.
But then again I am 47 and I guarantee that I look better at my age than your ass will at 47 . I make at least 3 times the money you do and will retire with several million in assets. I am smarter than you and yes I am better than you. Now go ride one of your strap-ons off into the sunset.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
One of my favorite parts of all this is getting someone so full of himself and prideful of his status in life and accomplishments to act like a fucking 2 year old who had his lollypop taken away. You don't know how much money I make. You don't know what I'll retire with and what I won't. Those are big bold predictions and statements considering how terrified you are that Obama and the liberals are going to confiscate all the wealth in America. Obviously you aren't THAT scared of it happening now are you?

I'm sure you're a real beauty and a pillar of a man who has to keep them at bay with a stick. And why did you pick 3 times the money? why not 10 times or 5 times or 7 times? Why pick 3 times? Just curious.

And you would be AMAZED at what I can find out with my "frantic google searches" as you said. Not too many attorney's in NC that own a Countach. I found you in about 4 minutes. Your firm, your home address and everything. So please, save that shit. Now that I know your name I can find your facebook if you have one and I'm sure some photos that will be fun to post here for everyone to see. Especially since you claim to be such a piece of ass.

And by the way, is your name calling and boasting a christian trait I'm not familiar with? You know, being so ignorant and all. Would your hippie friend Hey-Sous be proud of you for allowing yourself to be baited into a debate on a porn site forum with someone you think is so beneath you?

You are a fucking hypocrite loser who wishes you were all the things you claim to be. Go beat your dick and chant your mantra "I'm important and handsome and everyone envies me. I'm important and handsome and everyone envies me. I'm important and handsome and everyone envies me. I'm important and handsome and everyone envies me."
 
Google all you want sweetheart. While you are at it Google Big Rock Marlin Tournament. And by all means please post it here for the board to see. you have my permission lol at least 3 times as much as you make toots.
 

Mariahxxx

Official Checked Star Member
ok well good for you. it makes me happy to know that you will paying for poor people's medicine and health care with the taxes you'll be paying which I'm sure pisses you off. It also makes me happy to know that there will be another democrat in the white house next time around to take even more. Hopefully it'll be Elizabeth Warren who will dig deeper into the pockets of the greedy fuckers such as yourself. You made me smile today counselor. Thank you!

Who cares about some hick fishing tournament? I'm not googling that shit. and counselor, You Might wanna take a little less posturing in your looks. You are clearly overweight and that hairline doesn't have much left in the tank. So when you brag about your looks, who exactly are you comparing yourself to?
 
Nice try. I have admitted to weighing 225 when I should weigh 200 but at 6 ft i still can pull it off. You have turned up some balding lawyer? Really I may be plenty of things but balding ain't one of them. And since I really do know your real name maybe I should pull some county tax records down in Florida and see if you own what you claim to own or if there are any liens or judgments. Thanks for giving me some ideas to entertain myself today. And by all means please please post my personal info here or whomever it is. lol
 
But then again I am 47 and I guarantee that I look better at my age than your ass will at 47 . I make at least 3 times the money you do and will retire with several million in assets. I am smarter than you and yes I am better than you. Now go ride one of your strap-ons off into the sunset.

Pictures please! Then we can start the betting. Blue Countach's face (now at age of 47) vs. Mariah Milano's Ass (when she turns 47)! We will have to wait couple of years and hope no accidents happen before we get see the final outcome of this battle...
:yoda:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top