What she showed in the Naughty Leprechaun set she used to show more frequently around 2005-2006. She's got everyone under the illusion that she show's more these days because she puts out so much tame stuff now, that all she has to do is flash some pubes and people go nuts for it.
I have one vid of patty that, she hides her tits with her hair and then, start shaking them. You see both her tits very well. Dont know if it was her intention lol.
But there's one thing that bothers me, she never heard about HD videos?? Or is it beacause, everything we see is really old stuff?
I was a member when this topic came up for the first time in her forums. Her reasoning was something along the lines of a non-HD camera making her feel more comfortable to "be more adventurous" about "allowing" slips and peeks in her content.
Of course in my opinion, if you're allowing slips and peeks to show up, but the camera is 50 feet away and blurry then what's the damn point? If you're not ever going to actually go nude then you might as well zoom in with an HD camera because you're not really showing us much right now anyway. I don't think I'll miss seeing the occasional flash of bush or a slip of 1/10th of your areola.
:2 cents:
BTFU85 said: What she showed in the Naughty Leprechaun set she used to show more frequently around 2005-2006.
...oooh that a nice coffee...
...veeeery nice coffee....
Sir, kindly explain what you are on about.
Why are you still arguing about all this? I had thought you had all reached a level of understanding about Pattycake -- I guess I was wrong.
@BTFU85: You're very right about that -- she is a frustrating mix of exhibitionism and shyness sometimes, but I'd like to keep encouraging her to be "experimental."
@luvtheladies: Right there with ya, brother. (pic)
@revidffum: Most of her pics can be seen on the many referral boards she uses to get traffic to her site (e.g., 88galsdotcom), so no need to join just for that. What you'll miss are the full length videos, easter eggs, LTOs and whatever personal information she deems worthy for the masses -- should you care. If I was a White Knight kinda guy I'd probably call you "a philistine not worthy of Pattycake's radiance," but I don't know you and am not that kind of fan, so let's just say that your expectations are widely shared -- in the meantime (pic)
Well I am willing to bet you could pull examples from any year and still make that statement. Pattycake has been consistently inconsistent over the years, though lately (the last two years or so) I have seen greater care in cycling the updates between hot and not.
mmm coffee....
Would you possibly be referring to a particular incident on the forums from a few years back?
...oooh that a nice coffee...
...veeeery nice coffee....
mmm coffee....
nah. just sippin' on some nice coffee.
Are you disturbed, stupid, ignorant, trying to be funny, unmedicated, or just plain weird?