Well now that's ironic: just when there were loads of complaints about Patty's lack of "exposure," she reveals more all at once than I think we've ever seen. Go figure.
Pattycake / Patty Cake
- Thread starter sumpin_diffrent
- Start date
-
- Tags
- patty cake pattycake
Well now that's ironic: just when there were loads of complaints about Patty's lack of "exposure," she reveals more all at once than I think we've ever seen. Go figure.
OMG! time to take a razor to that 70's hairy muff.... :eeew:
She's not stupid — I think Sociologists call that update the "theory of intermittent rewards." :1orglaugh
@whalers90: Since you like it so much, here's another one:
There have been plenty of updates that show the same amount that she shows in this new set.
It's always the same, close, but not close enough. Close enough apparently for people like you that make it completely comfortable for her to never actually show us everything in one picture or video clip though.
But hey, if all it takes for you to get your rocks off is some pubes, more power to you.
So, as I understand your posts, you complain about her not showing anything, and then when she does, you complain that there's hair on it?
I'm just looking for clarification here. You do complain a lot in non-nude models' threads about how they never show anything new. They are non-nude models. If you check in, expecting them to be showing nudity (again, remember the phrase non-nude), you're going to be disappointed. Some people are quite happy with the non-nude (remember, if you look for nudes in non-nude model threads, you'll be disappointed) genre. If you're not, stop checking.
Here's a summary: non-nude models don't get nude. Keep checking back. They'll still be non-nude. Get pissed about them not showing the nude bits, they'll still be non-nude. Bitch to the members who like the non-nude models about how the models committed to non-nude sites don't get nude, you'll get mocked.
The non-nude models are not changing their routine. They're making money, and they don't care at all about you being pissed because they're non-nude and non-shaved.
That is all. Please let me know if any of that is unclear.
Go away, White Knight.
Plenty of non-nude models have gone nude as a result of going to the teasing well one too many times. But White Knights like you defend it to no end and empower these cockteases to keep charging $25-$30 a month for shit you can get in a frickin' Maxim magazine. In fact, if you love non-nude so much, that's what you should do. Just a buy a Maxim and stop paying for teasing bullshit.
Plenty of non-nude models have gone nude as a result of going to the teasing well one too many times. But White Knights like you defend it to no end and empower these cockteases to keep charging $25-$30 a month for shit you can get in a frickin' Maxim magazine. In fact, if you love non-nude so much, that's what you should do. Just a buy a Maxim and stop paying for teasing bullshit.
:bowdown:
you knowing all my posts and that i post in non-nude models threads is FUCKING CREEPY! :wtf:
:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
Thanks for not answering anything I asked.
Do I know all your posts in non-nude threads? No. I simply have seen you post a lot in threads that I follow, and you always say the same thing. It makes you mundanely memorable. Like your mom's stuffing at Thanksgiving. Mundanely the same, yet memorable.
And I'm not trying, in any way, to be a White Knight. I'm just wondering what the FUCK can be gained by getting into non-nude threads and bitching that they're non-nude? Sure, plenty have gone nude. So what? They're non-nude models until they go nude. Don't like it, don't check.
Also, stop posting shit about wanting them to go nude. A lot of us would like to see more. Having to read shitty posts from other frustrated people doesn't make life better.
:2 cents:
you're a CREEP i dont need to answer anything for you,i got bored 1 sentence into your "statement"
nn models are usually quite hot. so logic would say that it would be pretty nice to see them quite naked. and if a nn-model, such as patty, has been nn for at least 9 (if not 10) years, such as patty, it's perfectly acceptable to bitch about it!
so at least in pattys case, he can bitch all he wants. he has the right to do so!
and as to what can be gained from it? well if patty has any fairness in her, she'd go nude. just for the sake that people like whalers and especially I have been waiting for it for QUITE A FUCKING LONG TIME!!!! her going nude, is what can be gained from it!
I was a member for a long time. Liked her site a lot. Enjoyed the tease and the "chase" of catching a slip and peek here and there. Then it got boring. Hell, her webcams don't even have an variety anymore. They're all roughly 400 pictures long, rarely takes off her top anymore, and we get about 150 close-ups of her hand in front of her crotch. Woopty-doo. Not to mention when we DO get a slip or peek, the camera is 50 feet away and blurry anyway. Might as well be watching Japanese porn.
I'd love to come back to her site if he did some truly nude stuff a few times each year.
Oh but we can't. Too many douchebags who continue to pay and continue to praise.
I'd love to come back to her site if he did some truly nude stuff a few times each year.
Oh but we can't. Too many douchebags who continue to pay and continue to praise.
I'm going to go ahead and say that I'm not the creep. Thanks for confirming everything I thought about you. Your character quality shows through very clearly.
Cheers everyone! Enjoy Pattycake pictures, or bitch about them. Whatever. She's a non-nude model. Expect non-nude, or expect to be treated as an idiot. It's really your decision.
You're entirely right, of course.
Here's an oldie for us all to enjoy.
http://www.bigasstitties.net/free/Pattycake/7/
thanks budddy .. updates - link - share what u found - I guess that is what this forum is for - not to bitching what u link or dont like about her site or how much fan u were doring all this years
