Mccain Voted With Bush 90% of the Time!
- Thread starter black amal
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bush election 08 mccain obama
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
These two are a start. I don't know where to get the first one any cheaper.
The second book I ordered just recently.
Fundamental Laws
The Rosicrucian
ShieldOfHektor
Banned
And every word Obama speaks about his shady past is a lie that anyone with an adult brain can recognize.
Look at the bullshit he talks about his religion and how hard he tries to cover up his muslim raising, saying that his parents kept books of every religion in their house. Yeah right, what complete bullshit. He just can't say he was raised a Christian because that would be outrageous (considering he had two muslim dads and an atheist mom..) so he just says he was taught about ALL religions since he can't confess his membership to islam.
Then he says he's attended a Christian church, and it turns out to practically be a fuckin' Black Panther club where they preach hating white folks instead of the Bible. NOW all of a sudden when the media exposes his "church," he renounces his attendance. So I wonder, if America never found out about his white-hating black church, wouldn't he still be attending now? Of course he would.
He's an apologetic asshole who made up half of his shady past as a cover-up, and has no political experience whatsoever which should (HELLO) be the single most important factor in decision of a PRESIDENT.
He also thinks it's fine for a child to be butchered at birth if he survived an abortion. Fucking sick.
Look at the bullshit he talks about his religion and how hard he tries to cover up his muslim raising, saying that his parents kept books of every religion in their house. Yeah right, what complete bullshit. He just can't say he was raised a Christian because that would be outrageous (considering he had two muslim dads and an atheist mom..) so he just says he was taught about ALL religions since he can't confess his membership to islam.
Then he says he's attended a Christian church, and it turns out to practically be a fuckin' Black Panther club where they preach hating white folks instead of the Bible. NOW all of a sudden when the media exposes his "church," he renounces his attendance. So I wonder, if America never found out about his white-hating black church, wouldn't he still be attending now? Of course he would.
He's an apologetic asshole who made up half of his shady past as a cover-up, and has no political experience whatsoever which should (HELLO) be the single most important factor in decision of a PRESIDENT.
He also thinks it's fine for a child to be butchered at birth if he survived an abortion. Fucking sick.
ShieldOfHektor
Banned
"Literally"? He "literally" wants to be the next Bush? So you're saying McCain wants someone from George Bush's family to give birth to him..? :dunno:
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
I love when people say that Obama has no political experience. It's such an ill-advised comment.
http://www.votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=BS030017
The only reason that Obama doesn't have as many years in politics as McCain is because he's TWENTY-FIVE years younger than him.
Yeah I saw that commercial too.
Your point is?
Obama voted 100% in line with a Democratic-controlled Congress that has tied the LOWEST APPROVAL RATING ever in US History and lower than that of Bush.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/107242/congress-approval-rating-ties-lowest-gallup-records.aspx
I'm curious why you want someone who won't answer the simple, but tough, questions regarding their connections to known Communists and supporters of Marxist theory in office for 4-8 years?
ShieldOfHektor
Banned
LOL and all those examples are supposed to show his political experience? What do we have here... MEMBER of a handfull of SUBCOMMITTEES? Wow, he's definitely suitable for presidency, just like the thousands of other members of all those subcommittees must be...
KEYNOTE SPEAKER? :eek: No way! That's not even political... The ONLY thing on there that holds any merit whatsoever is that he's been a senator, but who in the hell cares..? What's a senator besides nothing? Holds no influence, holds no power, not in charge of anything. And that's the apex of his political career, before presidential candidate.
I had actually assumed he was more politically involved than that BEFORE you posted that atrocious list, you've done nothing but prove my point better than I ever could have myself.
You justify his complete absence and lack of credentials because he's twenty-five years younger than McCain? Wow, guess what -- twenty-five years ago McCain had a hundred times more experience than Obama does at his age. Not only that but he'd also already risked his life and quality of life countless times by then.
The only time Obama's ever risked anything was associating with terrorists and being anti-white.
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
First of all, your white friend John McCain is a senator too, so according to your theory of "what's a senator besides nothing", he also has no business running for President. Barack Obama has been the senator of Illinois for the past 3+ years. That's blatant political experience. Oh, but wait...he's not white, so it doesn't count. I get it, it's ok.
The only thing I've proven is that you only care about skin color and nothing more.
Barack Obama hasn't ever risked his life, huh? This just goes to show how biased you are towards white people.
Barack Obama (and his family) runs the risk of getting killed, each and every day he steps foot out of his front door. Why? Because ignorant racists like yourself want to kill him because they're afraid of having a black man as a President.
Gee, could you be any more racist? :dunno: If Barack Obama was a white man named Jeff Davidson, who had the same exact experience and lifestyle of Obama, but instead, he grew up in southern Kentucky and proclaimed that black people were inferior, you would be sucking his white dick right now.
It's narrow-minded, racist pieces of shit like you that give white people a bad name.
:ban:
ShieldOfHektor
Banned
LOL watch the Guilty White, everybody, here he is in his natural habitat -- the internet, where he can win every argument by calling the other person "racist". A propagandist in his true form. All your other points get shot down, so just start flailing around yelling "RACIST! RACIST! RACIISSMMM!"
I just love how you twist things to suit your argument as best as possible... Take for example how you say "the" senator of Illinois. As though Illinois has only one senator in its senate. Last time I checked there were nearly one hundred Illinois senators, and Obama is just ONE of them. That's his political experience -- one of a hundred senators in one single state for three miniscule years.
Yes, John McCain is also a senator -- he's been one for a long time, plus has tons of other experience besides; I wonder, why don't you quote THAT list for us dear ChefChiTown?
Oh wow, I'm ecstatic to be able to exemplify so well what I said above in quoting the latter half of that same post! Note, dear users, how the propagandist not only demonizes his adversary by likening him to an inanimate, stinky object rather than a person (the very thing he is so much against when other groups of people do it), and wins his argument with nothing but accusations of "racism".
I have to say, I just can not stop giggling at how incredibly asinine your attempt at an argument is here, WHAT did I say at any point that was even remotely racist? :rofl:
How in the flying fuck was it racist to state that Obama has never risked his life for his country? I don't have a clue what you thought I was referring to, but my point was that McCain has fought in wars and has been a casualty of war, all for his country and our liberty as the people thereof. Obama has not, and would not if he was given the opportunity, done a single thing to protect our liberties or stand up to safeguard the American way. McCain has, and that proves him better than anything else ever could.
Now how in the fuck is that racist? Please, tell me.
And finally, no, if Barack Obama was a white man named Jeff Davidson, who had the same exact experience and lifestyle of Obama, he would never have received a single ounce of support because he is nothing but an opportunistic exploiter of Guilty Whites across America who, like you, will vote for him for absolutely no reason except because he is black.
ShieldOfHektor
Banned
I don't, when have I ever judged someone based on their ethnicity I wonder. Perhaps you could point out a time that I did?
Never once did I say anything hateful or negative against any other race. I am what I am but I am also respectful and strive for peace. That's what we all want after all, isn't it? No matter what our methods.
Nazis hate people of other races. I am not a Nazi, I am a White Nationalist, perhaps you should recognize the difference. One calls for Americans to kill foreigners, one calls for Americans to live in America.
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
When did I say that individual comment was racist? Now who's twisting words? :dunno:
Also, just to address your hilarious attempt at trying to claim that you are NOT a racist just because you haven't said anything threatening towards another race...
According to your own beloved website, Stormfront, it contradicts itself by avoiding the true definition of "racism".
Seperating your "race" from all others is a racist act. It is saying that you want nothing to do with blacks, Asians, Mexicans (etc) for no reason other than that they are not white. That is a perfect example of judging a people (as a whole) by their ethnicity...that is 100% racist.
This completely contradicts what the first Q&A states. In the first Q&A, it clearly states that you want to create a "SEPERATE nation", which would, in simple terms, create an all-white nation. If you truly, truly didn't feel superior to other races, you would have absolutely no problem at all living with them, as you would consider yourselves equals. Obviously, you do not, as you consider the white race to be superior, which is why you want a "SEPERATE nation".
You would have to be a complete moron to not see how contradictory this Q&A is. The sole reason that your beloved White Nationalists want to create an all-white nation in the first place is because you want to be the dominant race. Creating an all-white nation would completely eliminate other races, rendering the white race as the dominant one.
Again...how is that mentality and set of beliefs not racist?
ShieldOfHektor
Banned
Wow. I could use that exact same argument to justify racism and bigotry of all kinds.
rofl, an exact quote from your last post. ^
I have no idea what that means or is supposed to mean.
Did you not READ the Q&A you're quoting? What does superiority or supremacy have to do with it? The fact is that we believe a huge majority of crime and suffering takes place because of racial conflict. Can you agree? Well then why not just keep the races seperated into their God-given nations? How is it racist to say we should just all go back to how we naturally were meant to live? We don't desire segregation because we're racist, we desire it because we want to END racism. That's a hell of a lot more than you've ever done toward that goal.
Read the above response. Inequality has nothing to do with segregation. Hell, blacks themselves are beginning to want segregation once again, making their own black schools and their own black networks. Taking over cities and driving whites out. Why aren't you calling them racist?
Sigh... please read the above response, again.
What are "God-given nations". Now you are using God to promote your racist agenda. Un-fucking-believable.
YM thats all old pattern.God made different races delibertly according to the racists.This is old school KKK type lingo.
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
Who was talking about what I said? I was referring to your post of...
So, you want to end racism...by SEGREGATING white people into their own nation? An all-white nation, which wouldn't allow other races into it's mass of citizens, is blatantly racist.
First of all, we're not talking about "all-black schools" or "all-black TV stations", so that's why I'm not bringing them up. But, since you brought it up...I think that all-black schools and things to that nature are racist. Grambling, for example, which is an all-black school, is no different than a hypothetical KKK College which is designated as an all-white school. With that being said, it brings me to my "second of all"...
Second of all, an all-white nation is no different than an all-black school. They are both segregating people based on race and race alone, which is racist.
You and your White Nationalist ideals are contradictory beyond all belief.
*I am well aware that Grambling University has a white student body base of around 1% and doesn't 100% exclude white people from attending their school.
^^^Go Chef!, Go Chef!, Go Chef!:glugglug: Damn I wish I had gotten in on this before he went bye bye. However I will comment on one thing he said, I always find it odd when people like him say to other ethnicities that they should go back to their country of origin when their country of origin is the country that they were born in. Obviously he or others like him mean the country that their ancestors came from (example blacks=Africa). If that is the case then what is his country of origin because it sure wasn't the U.S.A and why doesn't he or others like him go back to it. Everybody's ancestors migrated to the North America whether they were slaves or not. Obviously he would say "No because I was born here." Well guess what, 9 times out 10 that person of a different ethnic background was born here as well and they have just as much right to live in this country as you.
And just to follow up on that point, if you belive most of evolutionary theory (I do) the human race supposibly began in what we now call Africa and then as time went on and as we are all natural explorers our ancestors migrated out some of us to the north where there wasnt enough sunlight with our dark skin to process vitamin D and as we evolved over the generations our skin became lighter to help us with that process. So when the guy starts talking about black people going back to their native lands is he only putting a time frame upon it, is he only counting forward from the 16th century? Because I suppose if we really want to get bogged down in semantics then we could say as we are all natives of one place. So he really didnt have a leg to stand on with that argument.
