LOL @ Keith Olbermann...

[titsrock]

What no comments on Chris Matthews:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwsDnRIMr5Q&feature=related

Michelle Bachman wonder if he has the tingle, then he lies on air saying he never used that comment.

Wow, so he didn't use tingle, but he used thrill:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no9fpKVXxCc&feature=related

Wait a minute, lets break out a thesarus
http://thesaurus.com/browse/thrill

Main Entry: 	thrill
Part of Speech: 	noun
Definition: 	sudden excitement
Synonyms: 	adventure, bang*, blast, charge*, circus, fireworks, flash*, flush*, fun, good feeling, inspiration, kicks, lift*, pleasure, refreshment, response, sensation, stimulation, tingle*, titillation, turn-on, twitter*, upper, wallop

Who is biased?

Understand something, all news is biased, take a report from AP or Reuters and then compare that report as it is shown on other news sites/telecasts. They state what they want out of the article. That is sensational journalism 101.

What does this have to do with anything? :dunno: You have posted a fallacy known as a Red Herring and maybe we'll call this the Texas Sharpshooter Red Herring?

 

[xfire]

So xfire where are the contradicting values I'm subsrcibing(sic) to?

Being a conservative douche and surfing porn. Incompatible with your self subscribed ideology. Now, if you prefer to call yourself libertarian that's fine, but act like one.

 

[titsrock]

lol@Trident

I doubt if you had even heard the term "cultural radical feminism" until I just posted it. Your lack of an education is glaring.

I think O'Reilly has a brand new book out with that as its title and with a photo of Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton on the cover? :dunno:

 

[meesterperfect]

Being a conservative douche and surfing porn. Incompatible with your self subscribed ideology. Now, if you prefer to call yourself libertarian that's fine, but act like one.

who let all this riff raff into the room?

 

[Trident1]

Trident, maybe you should quit before your hole gets deeper. :dunno: There are plenty of links around if you want to do a crash course in Feminism and then come back here :dunno:




You should ask for a refund. :yesyes:

What hole? I'm cognisant of Sapphic Feminism which is a far cry from the tripe you guys defend as pro feminist.




Now MSNBC has canned Chris Hayes for money contributions to Democrats. LOL!

Get my money back? Get an education? :1orglaugh

I have a Doctorate dimwits.:hatsoff:

 

[Supafly]

You obviously don't understand the many facets of feminism, there, Trident.

... That's why he is on my 'Ignore' list. That feels sooo good ^^

But the whole debate, again has way left topic once more, huh?

 

[Supafly]

Add:

Please read the article and sign the Petition.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-green/50000-sign-petition-for-o_b_779790.html

Trolls: Just ignore this. You are welcome.

 

[emceeemcee]

I have a Doctorate dimwits.:hatsoff:

:1orglaugh sure you do

 

[meesterperfect]

one guys says why are conservatives on a porn board and everybody backs him up.
another guy says why are liberals on a porn board and the same people get uptight and kinda nasty about it.

hypocrites from the word go.

 

[Supafly]

Meester, not all of us are perfect

 

[Hot Mega]

ok now lets argue about what or isn't feminism.
dont even fall for it trident, its a diversion.

your statement about why are liberals on freeones message board was a good example.
it was nonsensical.
hypocritical and just plain stupid.
but you knew that because that was your point right?
it was just a response to xfire going on about conservatives being here, which was just a diversion to begin with.
Anybody can post here and it doesnt in anyway reflect your fiscal, moral, political or any other views.
Now theyre gonna argue about what is feminism?

no he didnt.
xfire made several posts in response to fridays lame point of why are conservatives here.
trident made an equally ridiculous point stating why are liberals here.
and you guys took it seriously because number one youre too blind to see the statement for what it was and 2 you don't take critisizm very well.
the difference was trident wasn't serious, he was showing the hipocrisy of you people actually backing up fridays statement, which is what you were doing.

c'mon does anybody actually believe that posting here is only for certain types of people?
its an open board.

Yeah....he did start the discussion about women's rights. He was the first one to say the phrase women's rights in this discussion. Sorry, you're wrong.

one guys says why are conservatives on a porn board and everybody backs him up.
another guy says why are liberals on a porn board and the same people get uptight and kinda nasty about it.

hypocrites from the word go.

It's because cons tend to be the social moralists not 'libs' that's why "Try's..." reaching point or analogy is ridiculous.

He is reaching in the worst way by attempting to argue/equate 'libs' who supposedly support "women's rights" being as out of place as anti obscenity cons..(you know..the ones who shot Larry Flynt and kept dragging him to court).

HE STARTED the nonsensical discussion relating to women's rights. How is supporting women's rights by 'libs' equal to anti obscenity supporting cons in terms hypocrisy??

That was the issue mees...:horse:

 

[xfire]

How do you reconcile the puritanical sinful view of porn held by conservatives with your presence on a porn forum? :dunno:

Feminists are one group under the Liberal umbrella. See, that's called diversity, son. conservatives don't have it. :hatsoff:

Just as an aside- love the way you spell cognisant (sic) with your Doctorate, Trident. :clap:

 

[meesterperfect]

How do you reconcile the puritanical sinful view of porn held by conservatives with your presence on a porn forum? :dunno:

Feminists are one group under the Liberal umbrella. See, that's called diversity, son. conservatives don't have it. :hatsoff:

Just as an aside- love the way you spell cognisant (sic) with your Doctorate, Trident. :clap:

open your closed mind.

very few conservative people have a puritanical sinful view of porn.
probably about the same amount of liberal people feel that way too.
in the usa its mostly strict religious people who feel that way, which has nothing to do with liberal or conservative.

how can you just lump everybody into 2 groups like that?

for example if i want smaller government and less taxes and less laws i am probably a conservative or libertarian right?
maybe, or maybe i'm just a person who wants smaller government and less taxes and less laws !
but if i feel that way i must also think that porn is sinful right?

that mentality is so ignorant but if you feel that way i dont care.
i just cant believe that there are about 5 people here backing that ridiculousness.

 

[xfire]

It's simple. the repukes have adopted religion as part of their platform. Side with them you adopt their whole platform. Otherwise you're not a republican. The Democratic party believes the First Amendment supersedes any need to pander to religion; that's to say that all religious views are welcome in the Democratic party. Not the case with your republican teabagger conservatives. To boil it down into simple terms, the republicans are the party of emotion. Democrats are the party of intellect.

 

[Nester6]

MSNBC suspends Keith Olbermann

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upsho...spends-olbermann-over-political-contributions

Keith is a fuckin stupid liberal who makes it bad for all the rest of us!!!! Good Riddens!

 

[xfire]

Keith is a fuckin stupid liberal who makes it bad for all the rest of us!!!! Good Riddens!

Irony? Oh, yes.

 

[Trident1]

Yeah....he did start the discussion about women's rights. He was the first one to say the phrase women's rights in this discussion. Sorry, you're wrong.



It's because cons tend to be the social moralists not 'libs' that's why "Try's..." reaching point or analogy is ridiculous.

He is reaching in the worst way by attempting to argue/equate 'libs' who supposedly support "women's rights" being as out of place as anti obscenity cons..(you know..the ones who shot Larry Flynt and kept dragging him to court).

HE STARTED the nonsensical discussion relating to women's rights. How is supporting women's rights by 'libs' equal to anti obscenity supporting cons in terms hypocrisy??

That was the issue mees...:horse:

I mentioned it because some leftist thought the website was only for morally superior libtards. I love the how leftists go out of their way to exclude anyone who isn't like them.
See the word hypocricy and you'll see a liberal. Libs are the same as any far right loon, only the colors and uniforms are different.


Btw, I received my Doctorate in Theoretical FD. Thank you very much.

 

[xfire]

Liberals don't try to exclude anyone. All I'm saying is that according to conservative principles you shouldn't be trolling a porn forum. I would rather you realize how ridiculous conservatives are and enjoy life instead of subscribing to an ideology that takes the joy out of life. It's a shame you don't understand how fucked up conservative thinking really is. If you're claiming you want "smaller government, less spending" blahblah etc you need to think about the record deficits run up by republicans. Bottom line is the conservatives are selling you a fake bill of goods.

 

[titsrock]

I have a Doctorate dimwits.:hatsoff:

:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:

Is it a REAL PhD or is it a crackerjack "internet" degree? I have to call into question the validity of this alleged degree....:elaugh:

I guess some little colleges hand out degrees for silly things like Real Estate, P.E. etc.

If it's an EdD, well, that makes me wonder about your "Centrism" :rofl:

Oh, Trident...you are a piece of work :hatsoff:

 

[Friday on my mind]

I mentioned it because some leftist thought the website was only for morally superior libtards. I love the how leftists go out of their way to exclude anyone who isn't like them.
See the word hypocricy and you'll see a liberal. Libs are the same as any far right loon, only the colors and uniforms are different.


Btw, I received my Doctorate in Theoretical FD. Thank you very much.

What you are mising is that what I am saying is that it really is and aways has been the people without sexual inhibitions have been overwhelmingly the more progressive parts of society who are seen to be lacking morals by the more traditional call it conservative members of society.

Free love ,the sexual revolution,etc etc etc were not common among the more conservative leaning parts of society in the 60s now were they?
No in fact those people were violently opposed to all that open sexuality.To claim anything else is ridiculous.

And to this day the vast majority of conservatives are people,who think a lot of such things like porn and other forms of open sexuality need to be curtailed ,they usually claim its for the good of the children.

Now I know some here would like to have it both ways, enjoy this liberal value of open sexuality but still cling to narrow mindedness in other areas.I was just calling those people out on the hypocracy of such a POV and it obviously hit a nerve.

I will say this, there is something I find much more silly here then conservative members, and just plain funny as to how people rationalize things to themselves is the several right leaning OCSMs we have.Thats just nuts,don't these people realize the right wants them obliterated from the public square? Apparently not.