Cheers, I appreciate the response. :banger:
I thought you said you weren't planning to do her whole site, especially since that means with the current rate, we'd be going for 679487634 years(something like 8 years was said earlier, right?)
So I was just kinda extrapolating it from there. You not planning to change the model or keeping it going forever but instead maybe something shorter, 3 years, and not all the content is about all I was working with. Maybe 15% wasn't fair, shoulda been 25% or so if I estimated better. Glad to hear it's looking better than that from your end.
And yeah, we do get the effort that's involved and how much you've got on your plate, I don't think anyone's been questioning that lately.
Really, the only thing I'm stirring about is a veto power for you in case of hard weeks for us. It still just seems like there's enough content that if you veto'd one every 2 or 3 weeks you wouldn't lose anything, and we'd gain a mile. You don't think so?
I thought you said you weren't planning to do her whole site, especially since that means with the current rate, we'd be going for 679487634 years(something like 8 years was said earlier, right?)
So I was just kinda extrapolating it from there. You not planning to change the model or keeping it going forever but instead maybe something shorter, 3 years, and not all the content is about all I was working with. Maybe 15% wasn't fair, shoulda been 25% or so if I estimated better. Glad to hear it's looking better than that from your end.
And yeah, we do get the effort that's involved and how much you've got on your plate, I don't think anyone's been questioning that lately.
Really, the only thing I'm stirring about is a veto power for you in case of hard weeks for us. It still just seems like there's enough content that if you veto'd one every 2 or 3 weeks you wouldn't lose anything, and we'd gain a mile. You don't think so?