Where's the debate on our energy policy ?
America must follow the
leaders (a post which we once so proudly held) Japan, India, France and Germany in the immediate construction of Clean Air Nuclear power plants at once ! The radical and disagreeable environmental entity "sierra club" along with their attorneys and seemingly infinite lobbing power have managed to halt, hinder and freeze every proposal for this nation to become energy self sufficient.
I believe that OPEC would become somewhat negotiable after learning that Americans set aside these trivial political debates of convenience and began to break ground on the nuclear energy facilities required for the very survival of this nation. If not, stay tuned for
much higher grocery prices than we're experiencing today. The gallon jug of milk is approaching $7 for krist sake ! August - Sept. - $8 gallon of milk is projected. We have a choice of either sitting on our asses and exchanging messages about how horrible this president is :yesyes: :*****: or appraising how much higher our food prices will go before widespread civil disobedience begins. Will we **** each other or will we walk together to the steps of our state capital and demand that sensibility return to the protocol with respect to our
long term energy plans ? The latter I'd hope.
I was listening to an accomplished (ret.) Lawrence Livermore Lab Scientist, Professor, Designer,
Premium Link
Upgrade
Dr. Bill Wattenburg Livermore Natl. Lab over the weekend on his radio talk show-
The good doc strongly suggests that only a Nuclear Energy model, similar to what France has built for herself, could offer the required energy resources needed to sustain this nation into the foreseeable future. He pointed out that if steady and immediate construction were to begin within the next calendar year and in fact continued (under his model), this nation could quench about of a third of our total energy needs at the ten year point. Finally, the Doc recommended that pressure be placed on the political apparatus at once, the sooner the better he said and the answer. Oh ! and just think, we can rid ourselves of this
"brilliant" cost ineffective
corn for ******* fuel scheme. Perhaps this would help in reducing food prices. duh !
At this point, not a word from any of "the candidates"
