bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Can you provide us with photos of chemtrails and contrail and what in these photos can be seen in their content that makes them different?
Chemtrail "debunk" sites in general have no credibility because they don't do any independent scientific research, and are normally only persuasive to those with the very lowest intellectual grasp of the issue.
Please don't start quoting any garbage from that site unless you've reviewed all the materials in this thread thoroughly, because that site is a very old disinformation site, and anything I say in response will just be repeating myself, which, in general, I don't like to do, and may not do, if I deem your question to be too dumb.
Military aerosol spraying programs have been researched and documented for decades. If you are in any way trying to refute this reality than you are a complete and utter fool, and have obviously done no research regarding the phenomenon.
Its bunk, dude.
Can you provide us with photos of chemtrails and contrail and what in these photos can be seen in their content that makes them different?
Surely I am a skeptic with this issue. I have been sharp with my opinions early on. Maybe disrespectful. I apologize. You are posting information that is a serious concern to you and others. I have questions and concerns so please respect me without further name calling.
I find several of your claims questionable. I also see contradictions. I wish that you would address them.
Great to see such a meritorious and reputable icon of the world backing the cause. Then again he is as mad as a box of frogs. I rest my case.
You clearly have no better evidence than that provided by professional scientists and concerned citizens from around the world. What you personally believe is irrelevant because you are obviously too stupid and uninformed to create an opinion that matters.
Your link lacks information and what is provided is faulty. Those photos are at a much lower altitude since we can clearly see the land. This put these photos closer to the airport. Given this, we are going to see more air traffic. We don't see any aircraft without a plume out of the back so there is nothing to compare to. No pictures to compare it to from his plane that very well could have produced it's own contrail.
You need to become familiar with aircraft. The Airbus 319a cruises at an altitude of 39k' on coast to coast flights not 30k'. You contradict yourself in many different ways. First you say that very few planes with the equipment can fly past 30k'. You say that they can be rented. Next you say that it is impractical to use these planes. Why were they built? Then you say only USAF and NASA has these planes. Are they renting them?
You are the one providing faulty information and need to better educate yourself on this subject. I know what your next reply will be, I should fly my own plane up there. Sorry, it was you that came on here making these claims, not me. You are making the claims that you can clearly see the difference between contrails and chemtrails and know what is in them. You have provided nothing in any way to support those claims.
Uh-huh. You just summarily dismiss any counter argument as being totally bogus and all dissenter as unintelligent, so I'll gladly take the insults of a mad street prophet as complimentary.
Refer to previous response.
The first picture shows simple engine exhaust condensation, note that the clouds line up perfectly with the engines of each plane. It's no more dangerous than car exhaust, unless you walk straight into the exhaust stream. The second photo depicts contrails due to change in pressure. If you look at the front of the wing, you'll notice the jet's leading edge flaps are down, effectively changing the shape of the wing. This can also occur during aircraft maneuvering. Here's the same phenomenon on a few different planes: