Eric needs some time to answer this. Prince and the Revolution are not returning his calls.
Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky
- Thread starter eric2136
- Start date
All information provided by me represents the absolute best evidence available from a variety of different sources, and as such substantiates the reality of the subject. You provide no links to any scientific credible evidence specifically substiating any alternative claims, your unsupported fallacious Ad Hominem response is, as usual, insufficient. Try again.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
So you believe that Harold Saive, John Lear, and David Icke have scientific credibility?
Your question is irrelevant, however, I would enjoy hearing you talk some more about your scheme to rent research planes from NASA and fly them into covert military chemtrail operations, I find that topic much more amusing than constantly rebutting your pointless Ad Hominem questions and statements.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Tell my why you think that Harold Saive, John Lear, and David Icke have scientific credibility.
So you know such planes exist and can be rented. From who do we rent them?
So you know such planes exist and can be rented. From who do we rent them?
Rattrap
Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
In lieu of rep I'm unable to give...
Bob, I must say as someone who has worked with a variety of special needs children and whose father didn't occupy reality in ways that would sound strikingly familiar were I to go into detail, kudos to your patience.
Bob, I must say as someone who has worked with a variety of special needs children and whose father didn't occupy reality in ways that would sound strikingly familiar were I to go into detail, kudos to your patience.
Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky
As I said,, your Ad Hominem question is irrelevant. As for your lame brain chemtrail airplane scheme, it's definitely all yours, you think it's possible, and are vigorously promoting it as a good idea, so please fill me in with the details of how it would work, or stfu about it because I think it's an idiotic idea.
- - - Updated - - -
Be gone idiot troll ! LOL
As I said,, your Ad Hominem question is irrelevant. As for your lame brain chemtrail airplane scheme, it's definitely all yours, you think it's possible, and are vigorously promoting it as a good idea, so please fill me in with the details of how it would work, or stfu about it because I think it's an idiotic idea.
- - - Updated - - -
Be gone idiot troll ! LOL
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Harold Saive, John Lear, and David Icke's scientific credibility is now irrelevant?
David Icke, fuck me that guy is madder than 10 boxes of frogs, with a side order of a box of frogs. To think he was once a sports presenter with the BBC.
Trying to discredit a person's argument, simply because you don't like the person, for whatever reason, is a basic argumentative fallacy. This is something that has been pointed out to you several times. How you feel about any individual is irrelevant. If you have any contrary thesis's, supported with independent scientific evidence, with links to all sources, that you would like to submit here for consideration, involving any particular point(s) regarding chemtrails, that has been expressly presented and/or endorsed by me, than go right ahead.
However, attacking the author of valid information just because you don't like his argument, is an invalid and ignorant method of debate discussion, and will be ignored as insufficient.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
No, scientific credibility was brought up by you. Those people were introduced by you. Do you believe that they are credible?
I never made an issue of these peoples' scientific credibility, and your opinion regarding that matter is irrelevant. Your question is invalid and irrelevant for the reasons previously stated.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Yes you did. You are asking for scientific credibility from me so I am asking the same thing from you. Those people were introduced by you. Are they credible? Yes or no?
I'm not asking for any scientific credibility from you because we both know you don't have any.
All information provided by me represents the absolute best evidence available from a variety of different sources, and as such substantiates the reality of the subject. You provide no links to any scientific credible evidence specifically substiating any alternative claims, your unsupported fallacious Ad Hominem response is, as usual, insufficient. Try again.
All information provided by me represents the absolute best evidence available from a variety of different sources, and as such substantiates the reality of the subject. You provide no links to any scientific credible evidence specifically substiating any alternative claims, your unsupported fallacious Ad Hominem response is, as usual, insufficient. Try again.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Okay, I think I understand this now. Harold Saive, John Lear, and David Icke provide you with "the absolute best evidence available" and "substantiates the reality of the subject." This is your, "scientific credible evidence "? Yes or no?
The absolute best evidence provided by me is rock solid and comes from the scientific analysis and observations done by experts in fields ranging from aviation science and engineering to medicine and nuclear energy. These individuals have been investigating chemtrails in skies all over America and in many foreign countries for at least a decade.
The best evidence also comes from citizen input from around the world, enviromental activists, and journalistic investigators of any and all kinds. How you feel personally about any particular individuals from any of the aforementioned classes is irrelevant and has no bearing whatsoever on the truth or validity of their observations or claims.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Harold Saive, John Lear, and David Icke's "scientific analysis and observations" are "rock solid" and the "best evidence." Do you believe that they are credible? This is a simple yes or no question. Answer it yes or no.
The absolute best evidence provided by me is rock solid and comes from the scientific analysis and observations done by experts in fields ranging from aviation science and engineering to medicine and nuclear energy. These individuals have been investigating chemtrails in skies all over America and in many foreign countries for at least a decade.
The best evidence also comes from citizen input from around the world, enviromental activists, and journalistic investigators of any and all kinds. How you feel personally about any particular individuals from any of the aforementioned classes is irrelevant and has no bearing whatsoever on the truth or validity of their observations or claims.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
He is that guy. But mind you that he provides rock solid evidence. An expert in the field with scientific analysis and observations.