i suppose you know for a fact that she didn't win because of her answer
When the judges admit it I'd say that's pretty much a fact.
i suppose you know for a fact that she didn't win because of her answer
When the judges admit it I'd say that's pretty much a fact.
![]()
You don't see the difference between cutting your hair and cutting your body open to put implants inside of it?
"Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body."
You don't see the difference between cutting your hair and cutting your body open to put implants inside of it?
"Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body."
Why do they even bother asking questions? I mean really, do these chicks even make a difference in life?
Do we really give a fuck what they think?
I wish she would have leaned forward and given that twat, Perez Hilton a smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper. Her views are her own and the fact that she didn't shy from the question speaks volumes about her character. I don't mind homos getting equal treatment when it comes to getting the same kind of benefits but it doesn't mean I have to accept their choice of lifestyle or the sanctioning of their union.
She is a beautiful girl, though.
Personally, I criticize her because of her rationale (or lack thereof). Saying she doesn't believe in gay marriage is fine, but the rationale of "that's how I was raised" is hogwash. It's tantamount to saying saying "I can steal because everyone does it".
As much as these pageants are meaningless in the long run, her title carries enough prestige in this day and age to merit formulating a simple sound argument for her position. Matter of fact, as an adult she has the responsibility to do so. Instead, she's giving an opinion and then basically saying, "don't hold me accountable for it, or criticize me for it, I just learned it from my parents!". It's a simple diffusion of accountability that I find makes her opinion stupid.
Good points. It is defnitely odd (do they have some sort of subtle agenda going on here), that they would have homo men telling real men what a women should or should not be? I think a hetro male is 100x more qualified to make such examinations. :hatsoff:
Strange that there are so many homosexuals and women working in the fashion industry. :dunno:
If gays and women cant judge beauty then it seems strange that the majority of the clothes being made for them are being made by those two groups.
Yeah, I guess. But I'm willing to guess miss Hilton doesn't spend nearly as much time "admiring" women (which I doubt he could even begin to conceive of with regard to women), as he does with males. It's all just stupid. But as most have noticed, the g'damn padgeant is a farce anyway.
I don't see it. If any alteration to your body at all was against God's plan then religious people would never be able to cut their hair or clip their finger nails and women couldn't wear makeup. I see doing that to yourself as a pretty different thing than one's belief on gay marriage.
If she's talking about what's natural, and what's God's plan for people, then really she should explain how her breast enlargement was part of God's plan, or why her diversion from God's plan is acceptable. (Yeah, as the other person quoted from the Bible, the idea is generally that the body is a temple; presumably not to be stuffed full of saline or silicone for the purpose of vanity or feeding one's ego) Breast surgery is a major procedure, much more significant than make-up, clipping nails, getting piercings, haircuts (?), etc. A boobjob is a MAJOR alteration of a woman's appearance. Further, there are plenty of practical reasons for haircuts, cutting one's nails, etc. Cutting the nails or cutting one's hair is not a fundamental, (more or less) permanent change, as the boobjob is. Make-up can be washed off at any time.
Sorry, I just don't see it. If one has already stated the body is some sort of very special thing in it's natural physical form their own personal religious perspective and then goes back on it then that argument might have some merit. However, just making the leap that God's plan doesn’t allow altering of the body in any way, and assuming all religious people believe that is going too far. I could just as easily say that putting makeup on is not part of God's plan and women that claim to be religious explain it. Even with one thing more permanent I don't see any real difference. I could also try to make the claim that if it was really in God's plan we wouldn't even have a need to cut our hair in the first place. I would say that even the vast majority of religious people in this country don't see cosmetic surgery in any real religious perspective and trying to artificially make it one and having people explain when they have it from a that perspective doesn't make sense.
People also weren't designed to fly, run fast, or swim very well. Yet we have airplanes, cars, and boats. Maybe if God gave people the intelligence to come up with those things for themselves then it can be argued to be part of his plan. (Not that I necessarily think that's true. Unless one is God, they can't really say for certain what his "plan" is, so I'm not going pretend I know it absolutely either.) Saying cosmetic surgery is against his plan is pretty arbitrary.
Damn, crack a dictionary once in a while if you don't know how to spell a word. (Must be the 3rd or 4th time you've written it that way here) It's p-a-g-e-a-n-t. The letter d is not involved.
\.
Get lost. Get hit by a car for all I care. Call me on some bullshit like that? Get back to your ATM. :thefinger
Does anyone of any intelligence give a rats ass what she thinks eithier way on any important issue of the day?:dunno::1orglaugh
^
Do you maybe think she was approached by "The Don's" people to answer that way? What are the *odds* that the Miss California contestant would answer in a way that just neatly slides into the *controversy*.
Isn't it likely that The Don saw an opportunity for his pageant to take over the news cycle?
I think the grander story in all of this is who took naked photos of her, for profit, while she was underage? Even if it was for some surfer rag who is this able to slide past the law? Why isn't this photographer (male or female) asked to answer for those photos?
I applaud Carrie Prejean for standing up for her beliefs and not caving in to answer this question in a politically correct way.
And it shows the hatred, bigotry, and intolerance from the other side when you don't agree with them and give an honest opinion as Ms. Prejean did.
:1orglaugh
With each new development she burns more of her self-avowed integrity.
And that has nothing to do with how she answered the question.
She's a calculating, advantage taking, hypocritcal liar.
A professional victim.
Another embarrassment to the religious right.
Next stop: Either a fat offer to pose for Playboy or a job as an on air personality for Fox News.