All about the DNC and its presidential nominating convention July 25-28

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Donald did it again. He said Bernie "made a deal with the Devil. She's the devil." He's not wrong, but.......his metaphors need a little more zazz.

 

[Mayhem]

Respect, mate, you must have hit a nerve with him. He sure got passionate with you :stir:

Well.....if you mean "passionate" in the way you mean "passionate" when referring to the Keystone Cops or a Laurel & Hardy movie, then yes. Very "passionate".

But if you mean it in any other way, I have no earthly clue what you're talking about and the visual of BC in a Hefner robe, smoking a pipe is one you will pay for. Oh yes, you will pay. :nono:

 

[BCsSecretAlias]

I only wear kimonos motherfuckers.

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

Hey, let's stay on topic. Conservatives love staying on topic. You won't catch a true Conservative derailing a topic with bullshit like physical appearance or DD-214s. Conservatives are the "Stay-on-Topic" Party and they do it as well they do starting unnecessary wars and naming post offices.

Don't make me call Sarah Palin. :nono:

WTF are we talking about here...? Hillary fucking Clinton and the DNC.


The revelation that Hillary's daughter married the son of a dirtbag felonious cronie of the Clintons speaks to her/and their lack of ethics and character.


Congrats, Mayhem, your candidate Hillary is a piece of shit. A liar, a cheat, and opportunist who never should have been a NY Senator or the Secretary of State who is running (and entitled view) on her name (Clinton) and her gender.

 

[Supafly]

Well.....if you mean "passionate" in the way you mean "passionate" when referring to the Keystone Cops or a Laurel & Hardy movie, then yes. Very "passionate".

But if you mean it in any other way, I have no earthly clue what you're talking about and the visual of BC in a Hefner robe, smoking a pipe is one you will pay for. Oh yes, you will pay. :nono:

I only wear kimonos motherfuckers.

See? How fast I can create a little love-fest.

The title of "Asshat of the Year 2015" was not wasted on me, I have my own wily ways of making you gay at my own will

:troll2:

 

[sean miguel]

Donald did it again. He said Bernie "made a deal with the Devil. She's the devil." He's not wrong, but.......his metaphors need a little more zazz.

I don't know about being the Devil, but there's a certain reptilian quality about her. I can't quite put my finger on it, but let's just say I wouldn't want to be a fly on the wall with her in the room.

 

[Mayhem]

WTF are we talking about here...? Hillary fucking Clinton and the DNC.


The revelation that Hillary's daughter married the son of a dirtbag felonious cronie of the Clintons speaks to her/and their lack of ethics and character.


Congrats, Mayhem, your candidate Hillary is a piece of shit. A liar, a cheat, and opportunist who never should have been a NY Senator or the Secretary of State who is running (and entitled view) on her name (Clinton) and her gender.

That's Right!!! Because when the Founding Fathers were chillin' in Philly, deciding that we are a Christian nation, they also figured that laying all the father's shit at the feet of the son is the next really American thing that we can do.

And hey Scott, if you were paying attention to anything but yourself you'd know that Hilldawg isn't my candidate or anyone else's around here. And I and everyone else generally agree with that last line. But hey, every time you remind us, an angel gets its wings.

 

[Mayhem]

House Republican Backs Hillary Clinton, Calling Donald Trump ‘Unfit to Serve’

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-party-richard-hanna.html?_r=0

Representative Richard Hanna, Republican of New York, broke ranks with his party to endorse Hillary Clinton for president on Tuesday, denouncing Donald J. Trump’s attacks on the Muslim parents of a soldier killed in Iraq and calling Mr. Trump “unfit to serve.”

Mr. Hanna has long said he would not support Mr. Trump in the general election. By throwing his support to Mrs. Clinton, he becomes the first Republican member of Congress to go beyond disavowing Mr. Trump, and join forces with the Democrats against him.

Mr. Hanna announced his plans in an interview and opinion column on Syracuse.com. He cited Mr. Trump’s disrespectful comments about the soldier’s parents, Khizr and Ghazala Khan, among the reasons for his defection.

“I was stunned by the callousness of his comments,” Mr. Hanna said. “I think Trump is a national embarrassment. Is he really the guy you want to have the nuclear codes?”

Mr. Hanna said he disagreed with Mrs. Clinton on “many issues,” but would vote for her anyway. “She stands and has stood for causes bigger than herself for a lifetime,” he said. “That matters.”

Mr. Hanna, who is retiring from Congress at the end of his term, has been a maverick within the Republican Party since his election in 2010. He drew a serious primary challenger from the right in 2014 in large part because of his vocal support for same-sex marriage.

But his support for Mrs. Clinton is another sign of the extraordinary dissatisfaction with Mr. Trump within the Republican Party’s elected ranks, especially as he forges ahead in his feud with the Khan family.

Mr. Hanna’s announcement also came as the Trump campaign canceled a planned stop Thursday in Plattsburgh, N.Y., an upstate city north of Mr. Hanna’s district. Mr. Trump has continued to toy with competing in New York as a general election target, despite its overwhelmingly Democratic electorate.

 

[BCsSecretAlias]

We need more RINOS like Hanna to jump ship.

Only helps Trump.

 

[knowone]

Chris Christie just came out against Trumps comments on the Khans.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Dear Mr. Khan,
I want to preface this letter by stating that I respect your son’s sacrifice for this great nation. By all accounts, he is a true hero that sacrificed himself in service to our country. For that I am thankful.
As a veteran, I watched your comments at the Democratic National Convention with a mixture of sadness, and anger. The United States has a military comprised of volunteers. Every single member has made the conscious choice to join the military and serve. There is not a single service member who has been forced into service. It is important for all service members (and apparently, their families) to understand that service to this great nation does not imbue one with special privileges or rights. I found your comments troubling when you said: “Have you ever been to Arlington cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”
Does it matter whether Mr. Trump has sacrificed “…nothing and no one?”…has Ms. Clinton “..sacrificed” for this nation? How about Mr. Obama? Your comment stating that Mr. Trump “…has sacrifice no one” is alarming. Are you intimating that YOU sacrificed? Sir, your son willingly sacrificed himself. As a father I cannot imagine the pain you must feel but his sacrifice is his own. He was not forced to serve.
I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member to parade you into the DNC to denounce Donald Trump. Did you watch when protesters at the DNC booed and heckled Medal of Honor recipient Capt. Florent Groberg? Did you notice your party interrupting the moment of silence for slain police officers? Your own hypocrisy in not denouncing these acts and instead using the DNC as a platform to make a political point is disgraceful. The simple fact is that whether one served or sacrificed does not give greater power to their statements. One vote is as valuable as another. That sir, is why our Country is great. Your condemnation of one person for a statement while standing idly as your party disparages veterans and police officers is the height of hypocrisy.
To conflate the need to prevent potential terrorists from entering our country with the belief that ‘all Muslims’ should be banned is simply wrong and disingenuous. As a reminder, Mr. Trump said: ” “Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life,” The irony of your son’s own death at the hands of these very people in Iraq should not be ignored. I have little doubt that your son would have recognized the need to protect our country from these very people. In fact, he held is own troops back so that he could check on a suspicious car. Your son understood sacrifice and how to protect “his people”…’his soldiers’….’his fellow Americans’…
As you continue to make the media circuit and bask in the glow of affection cast upon you by a party that has little regard for your son’s own sacrifice, and veterans in general, I would ask you to consider your comments and your position more closely.
Respectfully,
Chris Mark
US Marine and Navy Veteran.

Boomshakalaka.

 

[sean miguel]

Notice the difference between how the mainstream media wing of the democrat party treats the Khans and how they treat the parents or family members of those killed in Benghazi.

 

[Straight Shooter]

Notice the difference between how the mainstream media wing of the democrat party treats the Khans and how they treat the parents or family members of those killed in Benghazi.

You mean like the fact that MSNBC and CNN aired Patricia Smith's speech live but Fox News didn't because they instead chose to air Trump's phone interview with O'Reilly?

 

[pool_hustler]

I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member

I am troubled that this person would be so disrespectful to all the democrats who have fought and died to help ensure his ability to make such an idiotic statement.

 

[BCsSecretAlias]

I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member

I am troubled that this person would be so disrespectful to all the democrats who have fought and died to help ensure his ability to make such an idiotic statement.

You mean the majority of whom that died in the wars before Korea and that weren't really Democrats but rather what you refer to now as racist Republicans?

Ah, yes...

 

[BCT]

Hi My name is Mayhem and I'm a lamp. I make cookies with boat propellers and pluck the wings off of dragon flies and eat them. My mom suffered a ruptured eardrum from a propane tank explosion at a cookout for a Soapbox Derby race where she was the Grand Marshal.

My hobbies include offering to rub suntan oil on strangers at the beach for a quarter and peeling dried Elmer's glue from my nipples.

My brother is a turnpike, I wanted to be a turnpike.. But mom always liked him best...

Looks like he could be Jim Varneys son.

 

[pool_hustler]

You mean the majority of whom that died in the wars before Korea and that weren't really Democrats but rather what you refer to now as racist Republicans?

No. I mean the democrat veterans of a liberal political persuasion in all of our wars.
My very own extended family was and is loaded with them; particularly from WWII.
And my family is hardly unique in that way.

And when have I ever referred to veterans as "racist republicans"?

 

[BCsSecretAlias]

No. I mean the democrat veterans of a liberal political persuasion in all of our wars.
My very own extended family was and is loaded with them; particularly from WWII.
And my family is hardly unique in that way.

And when have I ever referred to veterans as "racist republicans"?

That is why I specified pre-Korean war.
The narrative is that before that time all racist Democrats would be equal to Republicans now.

Not saying you specifically are saying that.

 

[pool_hustler]

I thought the narrative was that conservative democrats from a specific region were frequently racist. Is there any arguing that that's true?

 

[sean miguel]

You mean like the fact that MSNBC and CNN aired Patricia Smith's speech live but Fox News didn't because they instead chose to air Trump's phone interview with O'Reilly?

No, I mean MSNBC's Steve Benen, saying of Khizr Khan that his words "won't soon be forgotten" and that no speaker matched the "sheer emotional weight and resonance."

But 10 days earlier, during the RNC convention, his headline regarding Patricia Smith was: "RNC Manipulates the Pain of a Grieving Mother for Partisan Gan." And called it "probably the lowest point a party has reached in my lifetime."



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-media-are-treating-two-grieving-parents.html