Lincecum wins, now Ive been seeing alot of folks saying it should have been Johan. I will respectfully disagree, I do think Santana should have been in second over Webb (again the goddamn wins), Santana was was untouchable the second half, but Lincecum was doing all that all season long. ERA and IP as well as pennant race pressure for Johan. Lincecum got most everything else except wins. 265 K's in 227 IP in his second year? Filthy.
Tim Lincecum winning the NL Cy Young just made a complete
mockery of the award itself. The ONLY reason Lincecum won is because of his 265 strikeouts. That's it. No other reason. Yes, 18-5 is a good record, but he shouldn't have won the Cy Young at all. Who should have?...
Brandon Webb
The voting should have went as follows...
1. Brandon Webb
2. Brad Lidge
3. Tim Lincecum
4. Ryan Dempster
5. Edinson Volquez
(I would put C.C. Sabathia on that list, but he only pitched a half of a year in the NL and I discount his eligibility because of that.)
Brandon Webb got
screwed and I believe it had
everything to do with his ERA. Webb finished the season with 22 wins. TWENTY-TWO WINS!!! 22 wins is pretty much
unheard of now-a-days and that alone should've given him enough of an edge in the voting. But, he also did other amazing things...
- Out of his 34 starts, he got the decision in 29 of them. That is also pretty much unheard of.
- He finished the season with a record of 22-7 which was the best in the major leagues.
- He walked only 65 batters all year, which was fewer than Lincecum. Also, 5 of those walks were intentional.
- He racked up 183 strikeouts, which is good, especially considering that he's not a "strikeout pitcher".
Once again, the only reason that he got screwed was because of his ERA. And, 3.30 isn't BAD either. It's not
great, but it's still pretty decent.
Also, to anyone who honestly thinks that Johan Santana should have won, you are dead wrong. He shouldn't have even been
considered for the NL Cy Young.