What I'm often perplexed about is why anybody would choose atheism over agnosticism if they don‘t belive in God or a higher power and believe what they say they do. People that are religious are understandable in what they belive. People that don't know what to believe due to lack of emperical scientific proof either way are understandable. Why somebody would have a religious like philosophy about the non-existance of something because of lack of easy emperical proof of that things existance when the nature of what God is makes ever having proof apart from God directly giving it to people impossible is much less sensible, and despite what a lot of athiest thing it isn't very logical.
Religious people believe in faith and for the most part don't pretend otherwise.
Agnostic people believe in what can be proven or experienced and base things off of that for the most part.
Atheist seem to have their own virtual faith yet try to hide it behind a vineer of science.
Religious people believe in faith and for the most part don't pretend otherwise.
Agnostic people believe in what can be proven or experienced and base things off of that for the most part.
Atheist seem to have their own virtual faith yet try to hide it behind a vineer of science.