Who should deal with Iran?

[Pattheprovo]

Micro militarism. The decline of all empires. You really need to take a small bout of semi isolation to lick your wounds and address your problems.

 

[Jagger69]

Looks like it's gonna have to be the US Bloodshot, bring back conscription!


'We'll set our sights on Washington': Chavez and Iran's Ahmadinejad JOKE about attacking U.S. with 'a big atomic bomb'

* 'That hill will open up and a big atomic bomb will come out'
* Meeting in Caracas comes on day Iran sentenced a man to death for allegedly spying on the country for the U.S.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-attacking-US-atomic-bomb.html#ixzz1j35nVmje

Damn! Chavez must have really piled on the pumpkin pie over the holidays!! Motherfucker's HUGE.

 

[Supafly]

I voted 'Surrounding Countries'.

They all seem to hate/fear that country and with them building they nuclear program, things get worse.

So let the neighbouring / area countries go in together.

 

[busenbust]

other: the Ratings agencies . /.

 

[Bearded_Menace]

Bah! Let someone else besides the US deal with these assholes. The more and more I hear about this shit, the less insane Ron Paul seems. Go ahead, let them have nukes. They'll never use them because the retaliatory response of them using them would be the utter annihilation of them and their people. Let Israel or the Saudis or the Ruskies deal with this shit. Any politician that suggests otherwise should be immediately relieved of their office. I am sick of war and the complete lack of testicular fortitude by the rest of the damn planet who just sit by and wait for the US to respond and then go on to bitch and moan like a bunch of sopping wet vaginas when we respond using means not to their liking.

 

[tiger1977]

Let Israel do it. The US can just play the puppetmaster on this one.

 

[Smallville22]

No one

 

[LukeEl]

Again send us more hot Persian girls, that is how we will deal with Iran.

 

[Supafly]

guys, iran said they did not have any intention on producing nuclear weapons, but israel already has a lot of nuclear weapons.
Iran only said they want to destroy Israel so let them kill each other, iran vs israel...

they both have dirty history, we should not sacrifice any other's soldiers for those two countries...

Mahmud, is that you

 

[PirateKing]

Iraq? Lol.

 

[hotrod808]

i say the us because nobody else will. and when the us attacks iran everybody in my country is going to crtizise you and bash on the americans.

 

[tartanterrier]

They would only have to kill Ahmadinejad,so why not send someone
on a suicide mission to take him out :dunno:

 

[vodkazvictim]

Nobody. Leave a country alone and they'll sort out their own shit. You can't sort out another country's shit for them.
Look at Afghanistan before the Soviets. After it was in a way worse state and after we leave it'll be even worse than it was.

 

[GibbsGrad2002]

Surounding countries or no one

 

[senorzorro]

Europe is weak, always has been... USA should handle that one.

 

[Mr_Balls]

I would rather watch an older country take initiative with Iran first, then provide support if need be. Semper Fi

 

[Crazy4theBrat]

I think we should take all the money we would spend on bombs and put it toward finding an alternative source of energy to fossil fuels. This will then make the entire middle east completely irrelevant once again. We can then take all of our troops out of the region as well. If we have ANY problem whatsoever with those worthless pieces of camel dung, we can just nuke the entire area.

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

I think we should take all the money we would spend on bombs and put it toward finding an alternative source of energy to fossil fuels. This will then make the entire middle east completely irrelevant once again. We can then take all of our troops out of the region as well. If we have ANY problem whatsoever with those worthless pieces of camel dung, we can just nuke the entire area.

More of less, I think this is ideal, my MN comrade, but is it realistically feasible? :dunno:

 

[Crazy4theBrat]

More of less, I think this is ideal, my MN comrade, but is it realistically feasible? :dunno:

It might take some time, but if I were the President, I would offer the private sector huge financial incentives for finding the solution. Offer a billion dollar reward for finding an engine that doesn't run on fossil fuels, and meets certain requirements. The free enterprise system can do great things if the government will just step aside and get out of their way.

 

[Mayhem]

I think we should take all the money we would spend on bombs and put it toward finding an alternative source of energy to fossil fuels. This will then make the entire middle east completely irrelevant once again. We can then take all of our troops out of the region as well. If we have ANY problem whatsoever with those worthless pieces of camel dung, we can just nuke the entire area.

More of less, I think this is ideal, my MN comrade, but is it realistically feasible? :dunno:

It might take some time, but if I were the President, I would offer the private sector huge financial incentives for finding the solution. Offer a billion dollar reward for finding an engine that doesn't run on fossil fuels, and meets certain requirements. The free enterprise system can do great things if the government will just step aside and get out of their way.

I'll take my billion dollar reward now, thank you. Industrial hemp. There's your alternative energy source, right there in our pocket, the entire time.