• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

who else who is a guy likes double vaginal?

N

NeoshadowXC

Guest
I can tell you that I am 100% straight and I would give anyything to try a double vaginal or a double anal. Hell, even triple vaginal or anal (yes it exists - I have the video to prove it :D)

No worries dude, what you like is the extra tightness and the friction, plus the lube of the cum. Its not the idea you're into, it's the feeling it gives you. And face it, tighter hole and more friction and wetness is going to feel BETTER
 
I can tell you that I am 100% straight and I would give anyything to try a double vaginal or a double anal. Hell, even triple vaginal or anal (yes it exists - I have the video to prove it :D)

No worries dude, what you like is the extra tightness and the friction, plus the lube of the cum. Its not the idea you're into, it's the feeling it gives you. And face it, tighter hole and more friction and wetness is going to feel BETTER

The friction? That's pretty gay.

I don't know if you ever tried DP in real life, but it ain't that great. There's a little membrane seperating the vagina from the anus, and you'll be feeling the other dudes cock for sure. In fact, the greatest disgust doesn't even come from rubbing cocks. Having someone's prickly nutsack drap over a part of you, or someone inadvertantly farting on your leg...that's much worse.

But if you're after it for the dick rubbing, well I'm sure that's right up your alley. To me though, DV is one of the many things in porn that looks way better in film than it does in real life.
 
To the original poster....I don't understand why if you know for sure you are not attracted to men, you have to question your sexuality over this... But I have to admit that most American men are really silly when it comes to this things.

Nevertheless, don't pay attention to those that tell you that because you did this, somehow you are a repressed homosexual. They are the ones that sound really repressed sexually. Think about it...if this were two girls pleasing a man, no body would even question it. The lovely ladies were just satisfying their men... But because it is two guys and one girl, some start jumping to wild conclusions. It's part of their homophobia, their problem, don't let their opinion affect you.

I don't think this makes you gay or bi, but you have to realize that there is nothing wrong with that either. Otherwise you are giving power to this people to distress you with.
 
To the original poster....I don't understand why if you know for sure you are not attracted to men, you have to question your sexuality over this... But I have to admit that most American men are really silly when it comes to this things.

Nevertheless, don't pay attention to those that tell you that because you did this, somehow you are a repressed homosexual. They are the ones that sound really repressed sexually. Think about it...if this were two girls pleasing a man, no body would even question it. The lovely ladies were just satisfying their men... But because it is two guys and one girl, some start jumping to wild conclusions. It's part of their homophobia, their problem, don't let their opinion affect you.

I don't think this makes you gay or bi, but you have to realize that there is nothing wrong with that either. Otherwise you are giving power to this people to distress you with.



This is b.s. imo. A lot of gay people and, whatever you want to call yourself Mr. Transsexual, use this tactic. I'm sure it's the same thing many of these folks tell themselves when they start cruising or putting on women's underwear or makeup the first time. You can wish and hope and deny whatever you want in order to get more people to try, but it's still gay.


If there's no definition or parameters for a term, than it serves no purpose. Folks such as yourself spend a lot of time, in fact create whole cottage industries telling people that sexuality is irrelavant. Well who says? You? If it comes down to your opinion, than the opinion of others are just as valid. If the majority of men will say "that's not something a straight man would do" than it's gay.

Why does it seem that gays seem preoccupied with getting seducing straight men? I think examining that objectively will expose an ugly secret in the gay community.
 
This is b.s. imo. A lot of gay people and, whatever you want to call yourself Mr. Transsexual, use this tactic. I'm sure it's the same thing many of these folks tell themselves when they start cruising or putting on women's underwear or makeup the first time. You can wish and hope and deny whatever you want in order to get more people to try, but it's still gay.

What tactic? In your asinine attempt to put me in my place, and mix transgenderism with homosexuality, you forgot to mention what is the "tactic" you are talking about.


If there's no definition or parameters for a term, than it serves no purpose. Folks such as yourself spend a lot of time, in fact create whole cottage industries telling people that sexuality is irrelavant. Well who says? You? If it comes down to your opinion, than the opinion of others are just as valid. If the majority of men will say "that's not something a straight man would do" than it's gay.

When did I said sexuality was irrelevant? Please stop twisting my message.

This guy said he had double vaginal penetratrion and he enjoyed . He should care less what people like you think and/or label him That's my point.

Why does it seem that gays seem preoccupied with getting seducing straight men? I think examining that objectively will expose an ugly secret in the gay community.

How do we jump from double-vaginal penetration to gay men seducing straight guys?? Double Vaginal Penetration must be a conspiracy by gay men to turn straight men gay..LMAO:rofl:
 
This is b.s. imo. A lot of gay people and, whatever you want to call yourself Mr. Transsexual, use this tactic. I'm sure it's the same thing many of these folks tell themselves when they start cruising or putting on women's underwear or makeup the first time. You can wish and hope and deny whatever you want in order to get more people to try, but it's still gay.


If there's no definition or parameters for a term, than it serves no purpose. Folks such as yourself spend a lot of time, in fact create whole cottage industries telling people that sexuality is irrelavant. Well who says? You? If it comes down to your opinion, than the opinion of others are just as valid. If the majority of men will say "that's not something a straight man would do" than it's gay.

Why does it seem that gays seem preoccupied with getting seducing straight men? I think examining that objectively will expose an ugly secret in the gay community.



This is one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
 
What tactic? In your asinine attempt to put me in my place, and mix transgenderism with homosexuality, you forgot to mention what is the "tactic" you are talking about.




When did I said sexuality was irrelevant? Please stop twisting my message.

This guy said he had double vaginal penetratrion and he enjoyed . He should care less what people like you think and/or label him That's my point.



How do we jump from double-vaginal penetration to gay men seducing straight guys?? Double Vaginal Penetration must be a conspiracy by gay men to turn straight men gay..LMAO:rofl:

You're the one who brought it up.
 
Oh really?

You seem to disagree with everything I say, so whatever.

Yeah, this person seems to have something personal against you, therefore it doesn't matter what this person says....and the gays are consuming themselves trying to seduce straight men like you, by putting on women's underwear and make-up. :rofl: Makes a lot of sense... LMAO :D
 
Yeah, this person seems to have something personal against you, therefore it doesn't matter what this person says....and the gays are consuming themselves trying to seduce "straight" men like you, by putting on women's underwear and make-up. :rofl: Makes a lot of sense... LMAO :D



Yes, please. Do not take it personally. I don't dissagree with you because you are you. I disagree with what you're saying. That's a big difference.

The idea that there are homosexual people out there conciously trying to broaden their numbers... by seducing straight men... that doesn't sound just a bit far fetched to you?

Like I said, it's nothing personal. It's just the ideas, the points, I'm arguing here.
 
Yeah, this person seems to have something personal against you, therefore it doesn't matter what this person says....and the gays are consuming themselves trying to seduce straight men like you, by putting on women's underwear and make-up. :rofl: Makes a lot of sense... LMAO :D

Wow you're so clever. Chopping up people's posts to make whatever you want out of them. Do you play Madlibs like that at work?
 
Yes, please. Do not take it personally. I don't dissagree with you because you are you. I disagree with what you're saying. That's a big difference.

The idea that there are homosexual people out there conciously trying to broaden their numbers... by seducing straight men... that doesn't sound just a bit far fetched to you?

Like I said, it's nothing personal. It's just the ideas, the points, I'm arguing here.

I never said that they are doing that to broaden their numbers.

I said why are they so fascinated with it. I also said that societal norms has no meaning whatsoever can be turned around on him. If the majority of men consider something gay, than it's just as valid as a few transsexuals saying just about any behavior is straight. "Oh yeah, you're straight, don't let them define you." Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
 
And understandably, this is the best you can come up with....;)

And you do what? Laughing? I'm sorry but you do nothing to refute my posts, to counter anything people say. You even trot out that lame old "People who disagree with you are homophobic, and because of this, they're probably repressed."


Right, and you know this how? From some biased study that says it? About the only thing you have on your side is that you have political correctness on your side. I'm taking the unpopular stance in criticizing gays, I get bashed for it. So what. But a lot of times what is politically correct and what is true don't line up. You'll see this in how definitions change with political currents. In your case, the APA is fighting over whether or not to reclassify transsexuals as mentally ill.
 
The definition of "homosexual" isn't a matter that's under discussion.

Being gay is being attracted to a member of the same sex. It's a reaction that takes place in the mind.

So saying "it is gay" is wrong. It is fringe, most certainly. It involves two males touching, yes. But unless they start making out, and procaliming their undying love for eachother while they're doing it... it isn't really a homosexual act. It is, as some one else on this thread has already said "just feeling".

And even if it was gay, who cares? That's their bedroom, not mine or yours.


I don't even know why I get involved in these "pro/anti gay" debates. The whole thing is just kind of silly to me. Why is everyone so worried what everyone else is doing with their genatalia?

I can assure you, if there is a conscious god up there, he could give two shits. :D
 
And you do what? Laughing? I'm sorry but you do nothing to refute my posts, to counter anything people say. You even trot out that lame old "People who disagree with you are homophobic, and because of this, they're probably repressed."


Right, and you know this how? From some biased study that says it? About the only thing you have on your side is that you have political correctness on your side. I'm taking the unpopular stance in criticizing gays, I get bashed for it. So what. But a lot of times what is politically correct and what is true don't line up. You'll see this in how definitions change with political currents. In your case, the APA is fighting over whether or not to reclassify transsexuals as mentally ill.

Stop lying already. I never said what you quoted. That is your idea of what I said, not what was actually written.

I am not saying that people who wont engage in double penetration are homophobic, but many who disparage men that do and dismiss them as someone with homosexual tendencies are in fact homophobic.

I also don't need to say much to refute your comments, because you are doing a great job at that yourself. This is a debate about double vaginal penetration, not about my transsexuality or however APA may classify it. Get over it!
 
Top