RichardNailder
Approved Content Owner
Somehow I read that to say "She was found innocent, however, personally, she can suck my dick."
And I'm thinking: "Wait your turn, motherfucker, wait your turn!" :blowjob:
Damn dyslexia
Vivid could sign Casey Anthony
- Thread starter AgentRaven77
- Start date
Somehow I read that to say "She was found innocent, however, personally, she can suck my dick."
And I'm thinking: "Wait your turn, motherfucker, wait your turn!" :blowjob:
Damn dyslexia
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Actually she was found 'not guilty', a very different thing to being found innocent. Not Guilty means the prosecution failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not a verdict of innocence, merely a verdict that reflects a lack of proof to convict.
It's actually a very unpleasant fact of jurisprudence that there is not a middle ground that allows juries to bring back verdicts that acurately reflect their feelings about the guilt or innocence of a defendent. In Scotland there IS a mid-ground verdict of 'not proven'. This allows juries to tell a court if the think a person was innocent (not guilty) or whether they simply thought there was not enough evidence to convict (not proven).
Hey ho. Fun and games with Dick & Jane.
that would be the worst thing ever.
:horse:casey i hatE you..may the whole world turn against you..may corns grow on your feet..may crabs as big as roach bugs crawl around your nasty ass and eat..may bills upset you till your a total wreck..and may you fall down through your own asshole and break your fucking neck...its been a pleasure..natuarlly Yours
I'd let her strip down to nothing to plea her case.
Pretty sick. Who could enjoy watching her knowing what she got away with.
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
You know for a fact she got away with...?
You do not have to be Sherlock Holmes, and her behavior alone while her child was ‘missing’ is disturbing enough, whether she was found guilty or not.
RichardNailder
Approved Content Owner
Good point - on the one hand, at the time of trial there was not enough evidence to convict her so obviously the people that sat on the jury didn't "know for a fact".
And on the other hand, if new evidence arises, she can be re-tried.
So either way, your statement is accurate. :thumbsup:
I don't know what all has been said in this thread already...but here is my take on it.
At the end of the day, for better or for worse, Hirsch is nothing but a piece of shit smut peddler. The only reason why the "offer" was pulled was because it was nothing but a publicity stunt on his part to begin with......AND since there was NO WAY IN FUCKING HELL Casey was ever going to accept the offer (something Hirsch had to have been totally aware of from the start).....and all that he was doing was generating negative press for himself and his company....he decided to pull the plug on PUBLICITY STUNT. If there was any chance in Hell that Casey was going to accept the offer....there is no way in fucking Hell he would have had any pangs of conscience. AND, for the record, I don't doubt for a minute that any said video would have been a HUGE seller....making all involved (aside from Casey....I mean we all know the talent basically gets fucked over in the industry....basically getting only crumbs as opposed to even a slice of the pie) millions. Does anyone believe that dudes that have no problems with seeing a lot that takes place on camera in porn.......would have a problem with buying a DVD featuring a very attractive young woman.....who happens to be infamous....child killer or not? I basically know the answer to that question. Ha ha ha!
At the end of the day, for better or for worse, Hirsch is nothing but a piece of shit smut peddler. The only reason why the "offer" was pulled was because it was nothing but a publicity stunt on his part to begin with......AND since there was NO WAY IN FUCKING HELL Casey was ever going to accept the offer (something Hirsch had to have been totally aware of from the start).....and all that he was doing was generating negative press for himself and his company....he decided to pull the plug on PUBLICITY STUNT. If there was any chance in Hell that Casey was going to accept the offer....there is no way in fucking Hell he would have had any pangs of conscience. AND, for the record, I don't doubt for a minute that any said video would have been a HUGE seller....making all involved (aside from Casey....I mean we all know the talent basically gets fucked over in the industry....basically getting only crumbs as opposed to even a slice of the pie) millions. Does anyone believe that dudes that have no problems with seeing a lot that takes place on camera in porn.......would have a problem with buying a DVD featuring a very attractive young woman.....who happens to be infamous....child killer or not? I basically know the answer to that question. Ha ha ha!
No worries man, the porn world is full of sex, crime and drugs.
.. and honestly, i d like to see her ass fucked pretty hard.. still better i d fuck her ass my self. she will never have my respect but her ass can have my penis for sure.
RichardNailder
Approved Content Owner
:dito:
Basically I agree, the only thing being that financially the porn world, even for scum like Hirsch is in trouble. Hence his publicity seeking, like Pippa Middleton is dying to do porn for him. I'm sure he's offered to Kate Upton and everyone else. His celebrity business is in trouble, that Heidi Montag thing never came off and the Carissa Shannon or whatever bombed. Even "octomom" turned him down.
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
Actually....that is not entirely true. In the event there is dual jurisdiction whereby one could be tried for a State AND Federal crime (because the criminal act actually was both).....then you can be essentially re-tried for the same set of criminal facts and circumstances. For instance, say you murdered a Federal employee in Iowa. Iowa could try you or the feds could since murder is a state crime....plus killing a federal employee is a federal crime. Say Iowa tried you and you were aquitted......the feds could turn around and actually retry you for the same murder. Now murder isn't per se a federal crime....only killing a federal employee.
A real life example would be back in the civil rights era where a number of southern rednecks and Klansmen killed people only to be aquitted by all white juries. The feds went ahead and tried them again many times for the federal crime of violating their civil rights....and many times they were convicted in the Federal trials.
Sooooo, though in this case, I know of no federal crime that was committed that she could be tried for, so Casey can not be retried for anything, HOWEVER, as I already stated, in cases where there is dual jurisdiction (where a State and Federal crime was committed in the same criminal act), you can indeed be retried with no violation of the principal of double jeopardy as spelled out in the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
That was illegal and you used redneck out of term. :tongue:
A second trial held after a mistrial does not violate the double jeopardy clause because a mistrial ends a trial prematurely without a judgment of guilty or not. Double jeopardy forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.
The United Mine Workers of America (UMW) miners work red bandanas and were called "rednecks."
Redneck is a historically derogatory slang term used in reference to poor white farmers in the Southern United States.
I stand by the term redneck to describe them (and I didn't mean it as a compliment)...you can call them good old boys, or whatever you wish of course.
And double jeopardy does not apply in cases where there is dual jurisdiction....as I already pointed out. You can not be tried twice in a court of in same jurisdiction of course.....BUT, as I pointed out there is the "separate sovereigns" exception to double jeopardy, and that does allow a criminal defendant to be tried twice for essentially the same criminal act (where same criminal act actually results in violations of both State and Federal Law....and even in extreme cases where violations of more than one States laws occurs).....as was appropriately applied to many cases in the civil rights era.
