Truck plows through crowd in Berlin

if we get some merkling over here in ca, tx we might get the fence quicker

a few years ago they built some metal walls and it seems they now want see thru fencing- did they not figure that out then

or did they build it and change minds

anyone here expert on best type of fence/wall types

maybe Germany needs merkle fencing
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Just checked it out more today.
Yeah, it was fake.
Fake as can be.

Nobody died, nobody hurt. Just another psy-op act of terror by The GOV.
 
But I don't think it's merely strategic rhetoric when it comes Obama and many like him. They are true believers. Islam is a beautiful and peaceful religion.

Well shoot, for millions and millions of people worldwide...it is. Bush, though he didn't have any family connection to it, seemed just as sincere in expressing the same as Obama.


Obama:

"For a while now, the main contribution some of my friends on the other side of the aisle have made in the fight against ISIL is to criticize the administration and me for not using the phrase “radical Islam.” That’s the key, they tell us. We cannot beat ISIL unless we call them radical Islamists.

What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed to try to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this?

The answer is none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.

There has not been a moment in my 7.5 years as president where we have not able to pursue a strategy because we didn’t use the label “radical Islam.” Not once has an adviser of mine said, “Man, if we use that phrase, we are going to turn this whole thing around,” not once.

And the reason I am careful about how I describe this threat has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with actually defeating extremism.

Groups like ISIL and Al Qaida want to make this war a war between Islam and America, or between Islam and the West. They want to claim that they are the true leaders of over a billion Muslims around the world who reject their crazy notions.

They want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion-plus people, that they speak for Islam. That’s their propaganda, that’s how they recruit. And if we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims as a broad brush, and imply that we are at war with the entire religion, then we are doing the terrorists’ work for them."

Makes perfect sense to me.

But not to worry, this kind of thoughtful, reasoned attention to what our enemies want us to do appears to be coming to an end.
 

Good article. Tough situation. Some of it I think is outdated, as I seem to recall the issuance of purple hearts has since taken place.

In a position paper leaked to ABC News last spring, the Army argued against awarding the 2009 victims Purple Hearts on the grounds that doing so could "be viewed as setting the stage for a formal declaration that Major Hasan is a terrorist." This, in turn, would allow his lawyers to "argue that Major Hasan cannot receive a fair trial because a branch of government has indirectly declared that Major Hasan is a terrorist—that he is criminally culpable."

This was the major sticking point I was semi remembering.

Every department under this administration had been politicized. Even intelligence agencies.

You and I simply aren't going to agree on this one.
If that were the case the CIA report on Russian hacking would have been hurried along and released prior to the election. And the FBI Weiner emails wouldn't have been mentioned at all unless they actually turned something up.
 
Top