My definition of liberal elitism does not mean educated. In my view the word takes on the connotation of entitlement, i.e. "We deserve to control the house, the Senate and the White House because we represent everyone and our views are beyond contestation."
"Job Creators" means fostering a climate that encourages growth, not creating a slew of jobs in government agencies.
"The War on Religion" comment is misleading at best. Judeo-Christian ideals and rules have been the cornerstone of our laws and society since its inception. There is a reason that the first amendment is what it is. This country was founded by people who were looking to escape religious persecution and intolerance. While I don't care for Eastern mysticism or its adherents, I do respect their right to worship peacefully. Freedom of religion is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community, in public or private, to manifest religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance; the concept is generally recognized also to include the freedom to change religion or not to follow any religion. The freedom to leave or discontinue membership in a religion or religious group —in religious terms called "apostasy" —is also a fundamental part of religious freedom, covered by Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
There are plenty of surveys, formal or otherwise, that show there is little disagreement that media bias is real. That said, it turns out that this bias is a bit like pornography, we all know it when we see it but there is little agreement on a common definition. So this raises a question: If there is no consensus on what constitutes bias or how it swings, does the charge of systemic liberal bias in the media have a leg on which to to stand? The edit of George Zimmerman's 911 call really did alter an interpretation of the conversation.
That stance you claim conservatives have on the pro life movement isn't even worth arguing about.
Your posts have little basis in reality. Granted, there are some tiny kernels of truth in some of them, but you have done nothing but taken those kernels and expanded them to suit your views. The hypocrisy of the liberalism can be just as easily skewered and lampooned so poorly.
