Obama Nominates Lesbian Elena Kagan to Supreme Court

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
This is already on Christwire, I am sure.:rolleyes:
 
Isn't Mike Myers in drag........er I mean Mr Kagan a bestest buddy of Lehman Bros.?
 
Isn't Mike Myers in drag........er I mean Mr Kagan a bestest buddy of Lehman Bros.?

Like Cheney and Scalia? Duck hunting together one day..I'll take part in deciding your case the next...:rolleyes:

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia fired back yesterday at critics of his recent duck-hunting trip with Vice President Cheney, issuing an unusual 21-page memo rejecting demands that he disqualify himself from a case involving Cheney.

Responding to a motion for his recusal filed by the Sierra Club, which is suing for access to records of a White House energy task force Cheney headed, Scalia said the justices have never been required to sit out cases involving friends in government who are being sued in their official capacities. To do so now, he wrote, would set a dangerous precedent.

Yeah a "dangerous precedent" like him having to decide a case on the fucking merits..:rolleyes:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A6214-2004Mar18?language=printer
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
i spent 15 minutes trying to find info on her background.
I have come to several conclusions.

She has no experience and she's not qualified.
Supreme court judge?
The highest possible judge there is, yet she has never been a judge, anywhere, not even municipal court.

Theres no business like show business.
Here they go again, choosing people by race sex and sexual preference, all the while pointing the finger of racism at others.
She's a woman and she's gay, who cares right?
They do.
" ok we've got 4 white dudes,1 hispanic, 4 jews and 3 blacks, and 2 that are so mixed we don't know what they are and 1 gay,, that oughta do it".

This women has no experience, is not qualified but I suppose she will serve her purpose by just voting along with the liberal democrat judges for her term.
 
i spent 15 minutes trying to find info on her background.
I have come to several conclusions.

She has no experience and she's not qualified.
Supreme court judge?
The highest possible judge there is, yet she has never been a judge, anywhere, not even municipal court.

Theres no business like show business.
Here they go again, choosing people by race sex and sexual preference, all the while pointing the finger of racism at others.
She's a woman and she's gay, who cares right?
They do.
" ok we've got 4 white dudes, i hispanic, 4 jews and 3 blacks, and 2 that are so mixed we don't know what they are, that oughta do it".

This women has no experience, is not qualified but I suppose she will serve her purpose by just voting along with the liberal democrat judges for her term.

There is no such thing as a "Supreme court judge".:2 cents:

I don't know about her resume but there is now requirement to have served as a judge. I know she has served as WH Counsel, been nominated for judge on one of the circuits and is presently Solicitor General.
 
I thought that judicial non entities must not be selected too the highest court in the land ? :confused:....this scary Kagen lady, who, again does not have any judicial experience . . .

She has no experience and she's not qualified.
Supreme court judge?
The highest possible judge there is, yet she has never been a judge, anywhere, not even municipal court.

MrP maybe you should have spent 15 more minutes on research. 40 of the 111 Justices that have served on the Supreme Court of the United States lacked judicial experience prior to ascending to the bench. That’s more than a third of all Justices. The last Justice with no experience was a guy named William Rehnquist who was the Chief Supreme Court Justice and presided over the Clinton impeachment trail. I don’t remember any complaints about him.




http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/justices/nopriorexp.html
 
As for this new Supreme Court Justice, I don't care if she's a lesbo or not. She was nominated by Barrack Hussein Obama. What do conservatives expect? Of course he is going to nominate a radical

She's a radical? What do you base that on?

because he is a radical himself.

He is?
What do you mean by "radical"? That's generally a pretty extreme term. What has he done that fits the way you define that word?
Is he a radical in the same sense the Radical Republicans of the Civil War and Reconstruction era were? In retrospect their unyielding commitment to the abolition of slavery was the right philosophy, though early on most saw it as extreme.
 
She's a radical? What do you base that on?



He is?
What do you mean by "radical"? That's generally a pretty extreme term. What has he done that fits the way you define that word?
Is he a radical in the same sense the Radical Republicans of the Civil War and Reconstruction era were? In retrospect their unyielding commitment to the abolition of slavery was the right philosophy, though early on most saw it as extreme.

Radical is a Republican term that was used to associate people with terrorism. Muslim clerics become 'radical', and muslims fighting (al-queda, freedom fighters, palestinians whatever) were all labelled 'radical' in the hope the public would associate all those with insurgency, terrorism and ultimately 9/11. ie The Radical cleric Al Sadr in Iraq, but he was never called radical before the Iraq invasion? Word has lost all meaning now.
 
Like Cheney and Scalia? Duck hunting together one day..I'll take part in deciding your case the next...:rolleyes:




I'm not talking about them, but rather Unisex Kagan. Lehman Bros. sooooo evil and look one of O's appointees had her hands filthy with Lehman dirt.:1orglaugh
 
I'm not talking about them, but rather Unisex Kagan. Lehman Bros. sooooo evil and look one of O's appointees had her hands filthy with Lehman dirt.:1orglaugh

Okay...that's the claim. Where's the "there"?
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
MrP maybe you should have spent 15 more minutes on research. 40 of the 111 Justices that have served on the Supreme Court of the United States lacked judicial experience prior to ascending to the bench. That’s more than a third of all Justices. The last Justice with no experience was a guy named William Rehnquist who was the Chief Supreme Court Justice and presided over the Clinton impeachment trail. I don’t remember any complaints about him.




http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/justices/nopriorexp.html



ok, nice research.
:hatsoff:
 
I still don't understand why you're angry about it. You know the majority is on the other side of those "radicals," right? For a long time, too.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
Either way, her selection is a moot point: lib for lib swap will have little consequence. This thread needs to go away...

Maybe you should have thought those thoughts BEFORE starting this thread :2 cents:
 
Top