Better than doing nothing and sitting back before something worst comes their way. At least it shows they won't mess around with this little NK midget instigator. Since when should a country sit back and say if this happens again you'll be sorry. Worst than a woman who stays with an abusive husband and keep saying she will leave if it gets worse or if it continues.
I do believe North America should stay out of it for the most part. Unless of course the missiles should hit one of our bases over there. Then we can step in and take care of this North Korean gargoyle.
Whimsy old chap I think we may have a misunderstanding here; I'm not against punishing NK, I just think that destroying a city will do nothing to punish the dictator 'cos he doesn't give a shit about his people and by punishing the people we will unite them against us.
I propose using strikes against what he does care about; his military capability. NK is a backwards little excuse for a nation, essentially it's Iraq in GW1. It will not be a real challenge to defeat the military and if we don't target the civilians, get out of there and leave the SK in control once we're done with the military then there will be no insurgency.
We'd win, the NK & SK people would win by their country finally being reunited.
If a war begins on the Korean peninsula, America doesn't stand a chance. Maybe Obama needs to speed up the return of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, so that they can be redeployed in Korea...for their seventh tour. Looks like, if this escalates, the draft might be...you know...
I'm afraid you're very wrong there. The SK could win this one on their own.
Why? The most important aspect of an army is morale; the average NK soldier (remember; INFANTRY ARE THE ONLY UNIT THAT CAN WIN WARS ALONE) has NO interest in defending the status quo in NK. NK maintains an army as large as china's but has a FRACTION of the population. Look at NK & compare it to SK; why would any NK fight AGAINST reunion of the two countries under SK control? They could finally reunite their country, the NK would get the benefit of living in a democratic society where they have rights and all the luxuries of modern civilisation, the SK would gain an influx of unskliled low-wage workers to do all those jobs you need such people for and they wouldn't be regarded as immigrants. Lets not forget that Germany has become a European country to emulate since reunification; it's a good idea.
Under KJI NKs science has suffered; they don't have the tech advantage in combat vehicles. Not even close. NK military has a budget of a mere $6 billion.
Have a look at their MBT: It's pathetic.
So far I've only shown you the disadvantages of NK military. The advantages of SK military are GREAT: They operate F15s which have a formidable combat reputation. They also operate K1 & K2, modern, effective MBTs.
SK Is famed for technology; when it comes to military vehicles, tech can give a hell of an edge if you've made it reliable.
Hmm it would be unwise for the US and China to meddle in this, they have bigger worries (each other).
Hower, victory would either side would mean big changes in the regional balance of power. When North Korea wins, Japan will be in direct danger and either way ask for instant US help (which will drag the US in). Alternatively, when South Korea wins, the Chinese will have a country which is suitable for containing China directly at their borders.
Besides that, I don't think it'll turn out to be big. NK and SK have so much to lose, they are almost equally powerful. They will only fight with assistance from a bigger force I think.
This is just some muscle felxing before the new leadership takes over in NK. Kim will have to make a nice introduction for his son right?
Interesting point.
Don't worry, the US is spending just as much on defense as the rest of the world combined. (A few years ago it was just as much as the next 20 countries or so, but because of all the little insignificant states and the lower end of the spectrum it now it literally 50% of the world share.)
Oh... and rising. And you have the stopping power of water on your side, lot's of water.
This is the money phallacy; just because you spend so much it does NOT mean that yu get value for money. There are a whole load of scams in us military procurement.
However the american military is at least motivated and, frankly, I can't see anyone NOT joining i nan attack on NK if deemed necessary by UN. So other militaries would likely join the fight.
NK Military on the other hand have NO reason to fight to preserve the status quo in their country.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Sleep :sleep: :sleep:"
Move along. Nothing here. We have no money and troops to do anything. We have no financial interest (i.e. OIL LUST) in this part of the world.
I would recommend to our South Korea friends to try diplomacy. It's cheaper.
^^A more realistic view here...
The real losers of this attack is North Korea's starving public. The food situation is bad this year and this ensured that the last stream of food aid will be cut off. China provides some, but not enough to prevent a famine.
Yep. Why they don't revolt/jump ship I'll never understand.