There ya go Bloody. Which one ya gonna route for? I'm takin Chicago.
Flyers are peaking at the right time. But...Chicago has been lights out lately as well. This should be a great series. I take Chicago in 6, but this one could go 7.
There ya go Bloody. Which one ya gonna route for? I'm takin Chicago.
Flyers are peaking at the right time. But...Chicago has been lights out lately as well. This should be a great series. I take Chicago in 6, but this one could go 7.
I'm going exactly the same way. I hope it goes 7. A game 7 between these two teams could be epic.
Sure would. :hatsoff: Both nice sized markets as well, so the ratings I have to believe would be a hit.
Not that any of us really need a reason.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/columnist/lopresti/2010-05-26-stanley-cup-reasons_N.htm
Well done. :hatsoff:
I don't know if you guys will think this is stupid but this is my home town team and the rink I helped hang duct work in.
http://www.jackalshockey.com/
Are you a tradesman? One of my best friends worked on Target Field, so that was cool.
Two outdoor games is a terrible idea. The Winter Classic is supposed to be a special game, so why have too much of a good thing? And for that matter, why have the teams they chose? Why Pittsburgh again? Why not Minnesota/Dallas at Target Field or Rangers/Islanders at Yankee Stadium? Why Calgary/Montreal and not Calgary/Edmonton?
It seems crazy to hold this in Pittsburgh. There is too much at stake here for the NHL to take a risk playing a major game like this in a cold climate, they really should only play these games in places like Miami or Tampa Bay.
:1orglaugh Who the puck said that?
I fixed it for you. Remember which thread you're in.