dick van cock
Closed Account
The sin is not in the picture; it's in your thoughts, you dirty old wanker!
No, it's not appropriate for a magazine to use someone underage to
sell their magazine in provocative, suggestive or in any stage of undress.
It's sexploitation of an underage girl.
Shouldn't they know better? :dunno:
So where's the line with this stuff? It seems to me we've rounded a corner, if a major magazine has agreed to publish a 15 year old girl with smeared make-up, wrapped in a sheet. The implied meaning is she just got done having sex & I don't see how it could be interpreted in any other ways.
She needs to be naked![]()
I would submit that their lives are not theirs to be in touch with . . quite yet.The lives of "young people", in most cases, require responsible leadership and guidance. Sure there are exceptionally bright and responsible 14, 15, 16 & 17 year old kiddo's in the world, however, isn't that the exception as opposed to the rule ? "Young people" have little or no previous "work" experience i.e. they're naive and vulnerable to the evils that lurk in the desire to exploit them, in many cases, and in turn, when they find themselves in crisis it's best that they have a responsible parental network with which to consult with.The law is out of touch with the reality of the lives of young people
√ Camel's nose is in the tentWow. She showed her stomach! OMFG what a whore!