Michael Vick Sentenced To 23 Months...

OK - I understand there are some that are comparing dogs and people, indicating that human ****** should bring a bigger sentence than ******* "just" a dog. But, most dogs I have known are better than most people, not to mention defenseless. So, any coward that ***** anything defenseless should get more time. Would you say that baby-killers should get less time than say adult killers?

This Vick asshole wasn't just ******* them, he was ********* them. I have seen for myself what these dogs go through and it is downright obscene. All the cowards who deal in this kind of Hellish act should all get the treatment that baby rapers do in prison. Then die of gohnerria and burn in hell. Perhaps they would then understand what they did to those beautiful *******.

Until one sees for ones self what this dog fighting is all about, one cannot accurately judge what punishment is necessary.

If anyone really cares check these out:

http://www.michiganhumane.org/site/PageServer?pagename=dogfighting
http://www.dogmagazine.net/dog-fighting-in-britain-the-shocking-reality/

Sorry to be a little harsh on this - but it really hits a nerve. :2 cents:
 
It would be nice if people were as concerned about the recent story of CIA tapes destroyed depicting the ******* of HUMANS by US govt employees.Sending Michael Vick to prison is ridiculous IMO but then again so is caring more for dogs than humans.
 

BNF

Ex-SuperMod
I don't see how his crime and sentence equates to ****** or manslaughter sentencing. They are different crimes and unrelated. The anger seems misplaced to me from that side - be angry at the sentencing for manslaughterers, sure. But the step to relating to this case isn't fair.

How callous some of the answers are, in the strained at best relatations of sentencing. I see no place in this story about caring more for dogs than people - nowhere. And, for that matter, in most ****** cruelty cases. It's a baseless arguement in this case, and again in most.

And let me add, that I, like most people, can process more than one news item, more than one outrage at a time. Just because some arbitrary producer chooses to place a certain story first or second has no bearing on my ranking of importance of any case.

I'm sorry. I detest violent crime of any kind. If you can't see the absolute sickness, bloodlust, classless, crass, stupidity of Vick and those like him in his perverted world - you have my pity.

Ghandi:

The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way in which its ******* are treated.

I hold that the more helpless a creature, the more entitled it is to protection by man from the cruelty of man.

I feel that spiritual progress does demand at some stage that we should cease to **** our fellow creatures for the satisfaction of our bodily wants.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry. I detest violent crime of any kind. If you can't see the absolute sickness, bloodlust, classless, crass, stupidity of Vick and those like him in his perverted world - you have my pity.

I completely agree.

And I don't see how anyone can argue against his imprisonment. Apart from the emotional issues involved, he committed a federal crime, and has been sentenced in accordance with federal guidelines for his offense.
 

slowhand

Closed Account
That's just a sap on the wrist he should have got more then 23 months.
 
Dr.Detroit and BNF stated the points well.I agree with them.******* are defenseless against the perversion of Human cruelty in the name of dogfighting "entertainment".--***** of ******* sickens Me.:mad:
 
if only they will be even harsher with oj. compared to oj michael vick is a saint. if oj gets no time for his latest crime, michael vick should be released immediately and given appology.

Yes, because that will make everything right in the world. :wtf:

Seriously. Two years may have sounded lenient at first. And then I was watching the game last night and I wondered if Vick was watching it, while locked up. Think about 2 years. 2 years is a pretty long time. What were you doing 2 years ago today? Long time wasn't it.

The goal of incarceration is to rehabilitate wrongdoers, right? I think that If Vick can't learn something from sitting around for almost 2 years, it's not like an extra 2 would help either then. Either he'll learn to be a decent human being or he won't.
 
Ok, so I've been letting this stew for a couple of hours and something isn't sitting right with me.

Michael Vick, a man convicted of ******* dogs, is spending 23 months in prison for what he did. At the same time, there are people who are getting away with ****** (pun intended) and spending 6 or 8 months in prison for ******* another human being. There are people being convicted of vehicular manslaughter while driving under the influence that are spending less time in prison than Michael Vick. There are rapists and ***** molesters that are sitting back and laughing at their minimal prison sentences.

Not to mention, Michael Vick can still get more time added to his sentence. Since when does the life of a fucking dog outweigh the life of a human? I like dogs, but...

What...the...FUCK? :wtf:


So....are you saying Vick should get less time or rapists and molesters should get more?

How 'bout this: **** a bunch of dogs and run an interstate ******** ring associated with it. TIME - 23 months. Get caught with 5 Grams of crack. TIME - 20 FUCKING YEARS!!!!

Our justice system is simply modern slavery.
 
This thread needs MORE outlandish comparisons! What about Hitler? He ****** 6 million Jews, and he didn't even go to trial!!!:rolleyes:

Yeah but he died of Syphillus. Justice is served.
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
OK - I understand there are some that are comparing dogs and people, indicating that human ****** should bring a bigger sentence than ******* "just" a dog. But, most dogs I have known are better than most people, not to mention defenseless. So, any coward that ***** anything defenseless should get more time. Would you say that baby-killers should get less time than say adult killers?

I would say the complete opposite of that. Anyone who would say otherwise has no heart.

Also, I think saying that it's "just" a dogs life is perfectly acceptable when making the comparison between a humans life and an ******* life. Let me ask you this...

If someone was convicted of ********* your first born ***** and was sentenced to 2 years in prison for their crime, then you saw that a person convicted of ******* a dog was sentenced to the same, wouldn't you be a liiiiiittle fucking pissed?

The point I was making isn't that dogs are meaningless or that ******* and ********* ******* is acceptable...I'm making the point of how screwed up our so-called "JUSTICE" system is here in the United States.

How 'bout this: **** a bunch of dogs and run an interstate ******** ring associated with it. TIME - 23 months. Get caught with 5 Grams of crack. TIME - 20 FUCKING YEARS!!!!

Exactly. Our justice system makes absolutely no sense at all. I don't think we should be known as "the land of the free" anymore, we should be known as "the land of the free...unless we can make a public example out of you, then, you're screwed."

So....are you saying Vick should get less time or rapists and molesters should get more?

Personally, I think that **** and ***** *********** are the two worst possible crimes that a human being can commit. If I was allowed to hand out sentences to these scumbags, I would give rapists and ***** molesters the death sentence, but that's just me.
 
I don't see what is so screwed up with this. The guy was guilty, he said he was guilty, he was found guilty, he lied so got more time added on. The guy is getting what he should get.
Yes, ******, ****, *********** is extremely bad. Comparing him to random cases for baby ******* and rapists and crack users is irrelevant.

For more on this, reread BNF's post.
 
Sorry you can pity me but I am not persuaded.Gandhi wrote a book called "The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism" so for him at least the ******* and consumption of meat from ******* was immoral and that is a legitimate view IMO but not one I share. By that defintition slaugterhouses are immoral,are we going to lock up the owners or workers someday.Now don't get me wrong I have no love of cruelty to ******* or people who would perpetrate such acts for sheer amusement but we have to keep things in some sort of moral relativism.Should Michale Vick be punished, absolutely, big fine,community service would be appropriate but not losing his liberty.And it is fair to raise if we are seemingly more concerned about these dogs then humans IMO.I recently put up a thread about the CIA erasing the tapes of the ********* of people held by them,it generated 3 responses as opposed to this one which has generated more than 30.Where is the clamor for those responsible to be punished? I don't see it.That is an example of priorities that are just slightly off IMO.

The CIA thread.
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=176475
 
Top