• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Rate this model on a scale of 1-5 with 5 being highest


  • Total voters
    536
man i hope not! that is completely unattractive to me!

I've noticed over the past few years there aren't many busty models who are otherwise of average build. They are either a little heavy or a little thin.

There are some extremes I'm attracted to:

1. Extremely big all natural boobs.

2. Extreme orgasms.

3. Extreme amounts of jizz (captured on 'film'.)

4. Extremely skinny girls. Makes quite a contrast; extremely skinny girl with extremely big boobs (all natural being ideal.)

I was interested from a business perspective if there was enough interest/demand to make it financially worthwhile to have magazines, web sites and web pages featuring busty proana models.

Jana Defi, Marilyn Sakova and Jordan Carver are pretty skinny to start.

Interesting to see if there is an inverse corelation: Publicize their proana diet and see if for every pound they lose they gain more money until they've slimmed down to beautiful busty skeletons.

It's very democratic. Those who are into this fetish can buy the magazines and go to the web sites/pages. Those who are not can pass on the magazines, web sites, pages.

It provides more choice for all my cyber porn fans out there (ie., all of us :partysml:!) :boobies::)
 
I've noticed over the past few years there aren't many busty models who are otherwise of average build. They are either a little heavy or a little thin.

There are some extremes I'm attracted to:

1. Extremely big all natural boobs.

...
... Jordan Carver are pretty skinny to start.

Jordan Carver's tits are FAKE. Just thought you'd like to know.

Any girl with fake tits is completely and utterly useless as a pornstar/model IMHO, and will never receive one dime of my money for any of their videos, websites, or anything else. No need for fake titted girls when there are plenty of hot natural titted ones to view.
 
Jordan Carver's tits are FAKE. Just thought you'd like to know.

Any girl with fake tits is completely and utterly useless as a pornstar/model IMHO, and will never receive one dime of my money for any of their videos, websites, or anything else. No need for fake titted girls when there are plenty of hot natural titted ones to view.

Actually, it looks to me like Jana Defi has implants as well. This has been debated in other threads (I haven't joined in them.)

Her cleavage where it starts has the unnatural "I" shape (as opposed to the natural inverted "V" shape.)

The lower inside portions of her boobs have a fold/crease - another dead giveaway.

When I look closely at large clear photos, I can see "half moon" shaped scars at the tops and bottoms of her aroalae. She had a "through the nipple" boob job with implants located in both the upper and lower layers of her boobs.

I know they did a publicity stunt where they called in a "doctor" who verified that her boobs are all natural. I don't buy it. Ultimately a verified x-ray will provide proof positive.

Aside from that, she's definitely passable. The doctor did a very good job. When Jana is topless, her boobs have a natural looking shape. When she moves around, her boobs move in a natural motion. When she lies on her back or rests on her hands and knees (assumes the doggie position) as seen from the front, side or rear angles, her boobs appear to react naturally to the changes in gravity. In photos and movies, the scars could be airbrushed and digitally altered so they are reduced or not seen at all.

Additionally, Jana is very beautiful. As are Jordan Carver and Marilyn Sakova. They are all quite thin - "prothinspo" you can call them. Look at the hint of ribs, the wasp waists, the slender (long and lean) elegant arms and legs, the slightly protruding hip bones.

It wouldn't take much. IMHO with a weight loss plan of 10 lbs a month, in 4 to 6 months these models would transform from average thinspos to stunningly gorgeous anas.

Definitely worth waiting for. If there is enough interest in it "ana" could become the new thin.:boobies:("ana" with tits):rubbel:
 
Actually, it looks to me like Jana Defi has implants as well. This has been debated in other threads (I haven't joined in them.)

Her cleavage where it starts has the unnatural "I" shape (as opposed to the natural inverted "V" shape.)

The lower inside portions of her boobs have a fold/crease - another dead giveaway.

When I look closely at large clear photos, I can see "half moon" shaped scars at the tops and bottoms of her aroalae. She had a "through the nipple" boob job with implants located in both the upper and lower layers of her boobs.

I know they did a publicity stunt where they called in a "doctor" who verified that her boobs are all natural. I don't buy it. Ultimately a verified x-ray will provide proof positive.

Aside from that, she's definitely passable. The doctor did a very good job. When Jana is topless, her boobs have a natural looking shape. When she moves around, her boobs move in a natural motion. When she lies on her back or rests on her hands and knees (assumes the doggie position) as seen from the front, side or rear angles, her boobs appear to react naturally to the changes in gravity. In photos and movies, the scars could be airbrushed and digitally altered so they are reduced or not seen at all.

Additionally, Jana is very beautiful. As are Jordan Carver and Marilyn Sakova. They are all quite thin - "prothinspo" you can call them. Look at the hint of ribs, the wasp waists, the slender (long and lean) elegant arms and legs, the slightly protruding hip bones.

It wouldn't take much. IMHO with a weight loss plan of 10 lbs a month, in 4 to 6 months these models would transform from average thinspos to stunningly gorgeous anas.

Definitely worth waiting for. If there is enough interest in it "ana" could become the new thin.:boobies:("ana" with tits):rubbel:

:thefinger
 
Actually, it looks to me like Jana Defi has implants as well. This has been debated in other threads (I haven't joined in them.)

Her cleavage where it starts has the unnatural "I" shape (as opposed to the natural inverted "V" shape.)

The lower inside portions of her boobs have a fold/crease - another dead giveaway.

When I look closely at large clear photos, I can see "half moon" shaped scars at the tops and bottoms of her aroalae. She had a "through the nipple" boob job with implants located in both the upper and lower layers of her boobs.

I know they did a publicity stunt where they called in a "doctor" who verified that her boobs are all natural. I don't buy it. Ultimately a verified x-ray will provide proof positive.

Aside from that, she's definitely passable. The doctor did a very good job. When Jana is topless, her boobs have a natural looking shape. When she moves around, her boobs move in a natural motion. When she lies on her back or rests on her hands and knees (assumes the doggie position) as seen from the front, side or rear angles, her boobs appear to react naturally to the changes in gravity. In photos and movies, the scars could be airbrushed and digitally altered so they are reduced or not seen at all.

Additionally, Jana is very beautiful. As are Jordan Carver and Marilyn Sakova. They are all quite thin - "prothinspo" you can call them. Look at the hint of ribs, the wasp waists, the slender (long and lean) elegant arms and legs, the slightly protruding hip bones.

It wouldn't take much. IMHO with a weight loss plan of 10 lbs a month, in 4 to 6 months these models would transform from average thinspos to stunningly gorgeous anas.

Definitely worth waiting for. If there is enough interest in it "ana" could become the new thin.:boobies:("ana" with tits):rubbel:

This isn't a personal attack on you, although the tone may come through as that.

Man... people are STILL arguing if her boobs are real or fake, even after she had a doctor visit which PROVES they are real??

Amazing.

Have you actually seen the doctor visit video? He examines (very closely) her boobs. No scarring of any kind.

He then does a sonogram, which yields the same type of information as an x-ray, basically. Finds no implants or evidence of implants.

That's where the argument ends. Sonograms prove it. It takes a picture of what is inside the body, essentially. No implants!

Her boobs are real. She has proven it with a doctor visit on camera. It's conclusive and the argument should have ended long ago.

But it didn't, amazingly. People then accused the producers of the video of having a fake doctor! LOL!

I suppose the building was also fake, the equipment they used was fake, the camera they used was fake, and we are all living in the Matrix in big vats of pink goo.

Oh, by the way, here is the "fake" doctor:

http://www.drkapoormd.com/

Rather than admit they were wrong, people still cling to an untruth to save their egos. And for what?

:dunno:

Her boobs are real. Let it go, everybody.
 
This isn't a personal attack on you, although the tone may come through as that.

Man... people are STILL arguing if her boobs are real or fake, even after she had a doctor visit which PROVES they are real??

Amazing.

Have you actually seen the doctor visit video? He examines (very closely) her boobs. No scarring of any kind.

He then does a sonogram, which yields the same type of information as an x-ray, basically. Finds no implants or evidence of implants.

That's where the argument ends. Sonograms prove it. It takes a picture of what is inside the body, essentially. No implants!

Her boobs are real. She has proven it with a doctor visit on camera. It's conclusive and the argument should have ended long ago.

But it didn't, amazingly. People then accused the producers of the video of having a fake doctor! LOL!

I suppose the building was also fake, the equipment they used was fake, the camera they used was fake, and we are all living in the Matrix in big vats of pink goo.

Oh, by the way, here is the "fake" doctor:

http://www.drkapoormd.com/

Rather than admit they were wrong, people still cling to an untruth to save their egos. And for what?

:dunno:

Her boobs are real. Let it go, everybody.

I stand to gain nothing either way whether her tits are fake or real. My ego isn't wrapped up in it. That is why I haven't entered the debate before.

Her managers and the industry stand to gain profit by creating an interest throught this debate.

If Jana is more popular as a 'natural' then that's the way they go.

Some doctors are motivated by humanitarian considerations. They want to heal. Others are more motivated by profit. Plastic surgeons tend to be more motivated by profit. It's where the big bucks are.

So Pinups pay him some cash and he "proves" that her tits are real.

That is one nagging doubt I have.

Here are the others (that boob officionados should recognize):

1. The "I" shaped cleavage.

2. The folds/creases in the lower inside under locations of the boobs.

3. Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe I'm seeing things. Anyone can agree or show me that I'm wrong, but I see two "half moon" scars at the top and bottom of both arolae in some images of her.

Ultimately in Jana's case, it doesn't matter to me. If she has implants they are very small and the doctor did a good job. She is very pretty and either way, I don't think any the less of her.

I don't like obvious boob jobs and prefer huge all natural boobs, just as I prefer everything that is real and all natural.

With Jana, this is not an issue with me.:sleep:

My fantasy is to see her drop 40-60 lbs and become a proana model.
 
40-60 lbs?? is that possible? or are you kidding? I'm going to answer for you to ease my mind. "Yeah I'm obviously kidding you dumbass. Some people just can't take a joke. Lighten up everyone, DAMN!"
 

pinupglam01

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
I stand to gain nothing either way whether her tits are fake or real. My ego isn't wrapped up in it. That is why I haven't entered the debate before.

Her managers and the industry stand to gain profit by creating an interest throught this debate.

If Jana is more popular as a 'natural' then that's the way they go.

Some doctors are motivated by humanitarian considerations. They want to heal. Others are more motivated by profit. Plastic surgeons tend to be more motivated by profit. It's where the big bucks are.

So Pinups pay him some cash and he "proves" that her tits are real.

That is one nagging doubt I have.

Here are the others (that boob officionados should recognize):

1. The "I" shaped cleavage.

2. The folds/creases in the lower inside under locations of the boobs.

3. Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe I'm seeing things. Anyone can agree or show me that I'm wrong, but I see two "half moon" scars at the top and bottom of both arolae in some images of her.

Ultimately in Jana's case, it doesn't matter to me. If she has implants they are very small and the doctor did a good job. She is very pretty and either way, I don't think any the less of her.

I don't like obvious boob jobs and prefer huge all natural boobs, just as I prefer everything that is real and all natural.

With Jana, this is not an issue with me.:sleep:

My fantasy is to see her drop 40-60 lbs and become a proana model.



What part of the sonogram portion of the video did you miss out on? It was very clearly done in real time, on camera, in plain view. We panned the camera back and forth between her boobs and the sonogram screen and even had them in the same shot, with the radiologist explaining over and over in plain English exactly what it is you are seeing as he moves the sonogram wand over her breast. I don't know how much more clear we can make it than that. An X-ray could be faked or photoshopped or anything. That was LIVE video footage of a sonogram examination right in front of your very eyes.
 
All of it. I haven't seen it.

Being the cynic that I am, it is possible that what was shown on the sonogram screen were images of someone else's boobs fed into the machine (off camera.) Similar to when we view something via live satellite. We can hear and see someone and they can hear and see us and respond to our questions - we can communicate live time even though we may be thousands of miles distant. With today's technology such Hollywood magic is possible.

I didn't type the sentence you are now reading. It was the guy in the room next to me off-forum who did it.
 
Top