Major Changes to the Word Censor List

[John_8581]

... Where are the servers?

Under the White House, in Washington, D.C.

 

[The Identifier]

Anyone else notice the main site doesn't have the censor?

Well, it does but it doesn't - or at least it isn't as obvious. Whilst the name shows up for any babes who have this name on their profile/bio, the content on the site doesn't have it. If you look at the titles of the videos and photos, you'll notice that her name is never referenced. Not for the ones with the name you make reference to.

But it does at least suggest that because it is clearly the name of the babe rather than having any other meaning, then there is scope for some context to be applied.

I would like to see a similar dose of common sense applied to the forum.

The frustrating thing from my point of view is that for most if not all of these words in question, they will be used in a innocent context for 99.99% of the time, but because 0.01% of the time it might be used in a way that would be frowned upon, we have to block out all the references rather than just dealing with the problematic 0.01%. The baby out with the bathwater approach, if you will.

 

[Supafly]

I have decided to log out until I hear that this decision gets lifted. If this sponsor demands such outlandish anti-free speech measures, that's a bridge too far.

Some of you know my email adress, they can contact me, others are on Mylady's site.

I hope it's not forever.

(Logging off now.)

 

[gmase]

I have decided to log out until I hear that this decision gets lifted. If this sponsor demands such outlandish anti-free speech measures, that's a bridge too far.

Some of you know my email adress, they can contact me, others are on Mylady's site.

I hope it's not forever.

(Logging off now.)

Me too!

Edit: Not going anywhere, but I concur with the sentiment.

 

[Jason z]

Welp. I guess my tourettes will be a bit of a problem on this website! I will think about logging off tomorrow morning at 1 am and taking a break from the Freeones board :/

 

[DrakeM]

Me too!

C'mon guys, its not that bad. You can still get your point across.

 

[tvstrip]

C'mon guys, its not that bad. You can still get your point across.

Yeah - not ideal, but at least we can still have a conversation until the site figures out a better solution.

 

[Torre82]

I mean technically ** cant, but I would be ***** if I were to say it is all like *******.
In 2025, when we've had the ******** at our fingertips for so long, without loading and without *****, anything that.. as my wife would say, 'stifles our creativity' will throw off the artsy fartsy folk.

Anyone that created a couple threads and lives for the dopamine hit of replies will go elsewhere. I'm not an ******, but I know when people need to express themselves in a familiar place. "It takes all kinds", no? They'll leave and take a bit of their energy with them.

Or, perhaps as the capitalists would agree.. be the easiest and best alternative and they wont go elsewhere.
Jobs did that with iTunes. The average fool will learn how to pirate an album if CD prices are too steep.

Granted, we're free. But if someone sees an obstacle (THREEFOLD!) to their life..
1: making their wank more difficult
2: They cant speak freely
3: In these paranoid times, censorship is always seen as a bad thing.

I can understand why they'd leave. I, personally, cant help but see the 'Tumblr' thing starting. A porn site cherrypicking their ethics?

I'm saddened to see people go. But I understand why.

 

[mentator75]

- Dre4m for anyone keeping score! Why is ***** censored?

In the U.S. now, only nightmares are allowed

NOTE: Those of you outside of the US probably won't get that joke

OK if they're kissing c's

I'm saddened to see people go. But I understand why.

I've been on this planet for too long and seen/heard too much to want to make a point by leaving a porn site

 

[darji]

This is very strange. I cannot even search for my favorite actress since she has a censored word in her name.^^