She did amazing topless shots in this months FHM... Don't know if it has been said, don't read the thread, sorry.

Sorry but that was Loaded :o

FHM doesn't do topless and also doesn't do Lucy. They've only had Lucy in once in all the time she's been modeling. Further prove of how bad it is :(
 
FHM doesn't do topless

is this 'doens't do topless, anymore...' coz i've def bought in the past and they've had tits out!??!
 
well i know keely's weren't fake in it! what about gail porter'? carmen electra's? :thefinger

The pictures wasn't owned by FHM. They was held by a third party modeling agency.

The pictures of Gail Porter was bought off a art agency that was going to use them in a publicity campaign. But FHM offered them so much money that they let them use them instead. Gail Porter also says still that it is the worst thing she's ever done. She still wishes that she hadn't agreed to letting them use them in the way they did.

Keeley was contracted to Zoo magazine at the time. Who just happens to be owned by FHM (hence why that is so bad too). But even then they was owned by the agency that did her first calendar.

Plus if you look at the timing that FHM do have a topless model or such in it. This is when their sales are close to or have been at a all time low. All the other time they are covered up.

Now having said that I'm going to ask you a question. In all the years FHM has been going in the UK. How many page3 models have appeared topless?

(One word of advice, don't go into double figures)
 
The pictures wasn't owned by FHM. They was held by a third party modeling agency.

The pictures of Gail Porter was bought off a art agency that was going to use them in a publicity campaign. But FHM offered them so much money that they let them use them instead. Gail Porter also says still that it is the worst thing she's ever done. She still wishes that she hadn't agreed to letting them use them in the way they did.

Keeley was contracted to Zoo magazine at the time. Who just happens to be owned by FHM (hence why that is so bad too). But even then they was owned by the agency that did her first calendar.

Plus if you look at the timing that FHM do have a topless model or such in it. This is when their sales are close to or have been at a all time low. All the other time they are covered up.

Now having said that I'm going to ask you a question. In all the years FHM has been going in the UK. How many page3 models have appeared topless?

(One word of advice, don't go into double figures)

well to be honest i don't recall but i have been thinking about putting up a new thread about page 3 girls who appear in the nude (fully) as opposed to the 90's! totally unrelated i know :)
 
well to be honest i don't recall but i have been thinking about putting up a new thread about page 3 girls who appear in the nude (fully) as opposed to the 90's! totally unrelated i know :)

Well that would be mostly full of 80's and 90's page3 models. As most of the 00 models don't need to go down that road. Unless your taking about the poor lower ranked ladies of the Sport newspaper.

Michelle Marsh and Sophie Howard have both done only one full nude shoot in their careers. This was extremely early on for Perfect 10. Which you wouldn't be allowed to post here because of copyright issues.

Lucy I doubt very much will ever do a full nude shoot. As both Michelle and Sophie have both said they regretted it now. Even though they was good shoots. As you know they are both very good friends with Lucy.

I did run a thread that Om3ga might be able to tell you about on another forum something along the lines of UK glamour models. Quite a bit of what was posted in there touched on a model doing a full nude shoot at some point. Unless they was from the 00's and then it was very little.
 

From yesterday's Daily Star Civic, so new!.

Since the announcement of the new contracted signed with them there has been 6 topless pictures published. To go along with the 7 non topless. Seems like both Lucy and the Daily Star are making up for lost time. Also the demand for Lucy has doubled if that was possible.

That is one of the reasons I've not been round much and not had much time to do things. The demand from the people I donate to in websites and blogs on Lucy has increased by 12 sites in the last 2 weeks on top of the 10 I was already working with. Plus I've currently got another 7 begging me to help them. When I say donate I mean pictures and information of course. At the moment three quarters of my computer time is been taken up by them. So I'm going to have to say stop somewhere. But you know me, that is something I don't like to do and let people down. After all I'm only one man though :o

I'm that behind with things I even took my laptop to work yesterday. That was highly risky. Just so I could have a new sig on Friday this week, preview.

Here also is a couple of behind the scenes pictures of a soon to be released Lucy shoot...1, 2 and you know me and corsets :) I'm promised these a couple of weeks before they are released :nanner:

Nice post though Civic, just a pity about the newspaper print. Although I tidied it up for my sig.
 
poggy your preview banner is hot and the 2 pics from lucy looks nice.:jump::jump::jump:
 
Sorry for double post but I think I forgot to put this one up earlier. It's a cleaned up poster from the Daily Star the other day. It's actually someone I know who is cleaning them up for me...

Topless poster

I would name him and give him full credit but he doesn't want people knowing for personal reasons.
 
Top