Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
I love to see a girl that fits my "perfect" image of a woman! Now I'd like to see her get nailed!
I love to see a girl that fits my "perfect" image of a woman! Now I'd like to see her get nailed!
-
Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
-
FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!
Erica Campbell
- Thread starter nastyfalcon
- Start date
Anticipation or hardcore?
Would you really want to see? Really? Or wouldn't it be better to leave such thoughts to the anticipation? I also enjoy the thought that some women leave it for their lovers, and no one else.
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
Not ever going to happen. If you had happened to have read back a few posts, Erica herself said this.
Welcome to Freeones!
:glugglug:
H
Not ever going to happen. If you had happened to have read back a few posts, Erica herself said this.
Welcome to Freeones!
:glugglug:
H
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
If seen Erica getting nailed i would delete my 10 gigs of pics that i have of her
It would just ruin the thought of a clean cut girl!!!
If seen Erica getting nailed i would delete my 10 gigs of pics that i have of her
It would just ruin the thought of a clean cut girl!!!
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
check out her interview on Pornstar Airlines
at myspace.com/pornstarairlines
check out her interview on Pornstar Airlines
at myspace.com/pornstarairlines
I didn't mean to [re-]start this tangent ...
That a woman can be a nude glamour model, expose themselves to lust and intimacy from afar, but still leave plenty that will never be known, except to the extremely selective subset of men that can call themselves her lovers (and most of them would not tell, as there is little need to). I think I tried to focus on that in the "part 1" of my post, before I divulged into a dissection of ERC's "Creation" with a hint of where that fantasy could go in "part 2."
Again, my apologies for stirring this discussion again. I hope people will see that "part 1" and "part 2" go together and are a consideration that is one the same.
Hmmm, I never realized just three or so paragraphs of fantasy would result in this re-newed discussion on ERC doing hardcore. My sincerest apologies to both the board and ERC, I didn't mean for this to happen. In fact, I think people missed the connection-disconnection I was trying to emphasize.
That a woman can be a nude glamour model, expose themselves to lust and intimacy from afar, but still leave plenty that will never be known, except to the extremely selective subset of men that can call themselves her lovers (and most of them would not tell, as there is little need to). I think I tried to focus on that in the "part 1" of my post, before I divulged into a dissection of ERC's "Creation" with a hint of where that fantasy could go in "part 2."
Again, my apologies for stirring this discussion again. I hope people will see that "part 1" and "part 2" go together and are a consideration that is one the same.
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
Hi Guys
This is my first post (I'm new to the Freeones message board)
Just want to say thanks to everyone who has posted links to all these pictures of Erica ... loads I've never seen.
... and Erica ... if you don't want to do hardcore that's fine by me. Just keep giving us these great sexy photos ... we love you!
Hi Guys
This is my first post (I'm new to the Freeones message board)
Just want to say thanks to everyone who has posted links to all these pictures of Erica ... loads I've never seen.
... and Erica ... if you don't want to do hardcore that's fine by me. Just keep giving us these great sexy photos ... we love you!
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
http://galleries.babes.tv/mg/09/?content=erica10&nats=d4babes:partner:BTV
http://banners.toteme.com/galleries-photos/erica_rose_campbell_4/vgirl/index.php?ids=804
http://www.amateursgonebad.com/partners/galleries/100263/erica_cambell_ama
http://banners.toteme.com/galleries-photos/erica_rose_campbell_1/vgirl/index.php?ids=804
http://galleries.babes.tv/mg/09/?content=erica10&nats=d4babes:partner:BTV
http://banners.toteme.com/galleries-photos/erica_rose_campbell_4/vgirl/index.php?ids=804
http://www.amateursgonebad.com/partners/galleries/100263/erica_cambell_ama
http://banners.toteme.com/galleries-photos/erica_rose_campbell_1/vgirl/index.php?ids=804
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
HUG thanks guys!
Yeah...i'd like to see me get nailed too...well...this week that is! lol and not on film heheh
OH! I will be at glamourcon in may if anyone is going!
HUG thanks guys!
Yeah...i'd like to see me get nailed too...well...this week that is! lol and not on film
hehehOH! I will be at glamourcon in may if anyone is going!
Hugs'n "Nails"
I hope I didn't offend you when I was explicit about your body. I was really just focusing on the design of a perfect woman. I.e., you being the most broadly popular example in form -- given both your popularity here and the repeat Playboy titles (among others). I wasn't really trying to drive a new tangent on how it would be to watch you do HC.HUG thanks guys!
Yeah...i'd like to see me get nailed too...well... this week that is! lol and not on film
And may you meet that chance, irresistible stud (or two, or three for that matter) at Glamourcon who will fulfill your fantasies one-on-one in private. A sharing woman like you deserves to be pampered as well as well-serviced.
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
Because he's still dizzy from Darius Kasperitis repeatedly knocking the shit out of him 10 years ago!
Quit entering the zone with your head down Eric! And find some new sets! :1orglaugh
Because he's still dizzy from Darius Kasperitis repeatedly knocking the shit out of him 10 years ago!
Quit entering the zone with your head down Eric! And find some new sets! :1orglaugh
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
How about a compromise. Any chance you will be photographed or filmed while urinating? Yeah, I know. I'm a sick fuck.
And Prof V, I am sure your well-wishing for ERC finding a stud (or 3) to fulfill every desire is much appreciated but I would be shocked to no end if she doesn't have a boyfriend.
A girl like that is born with a boyfriend.
HUG thanks guys!
Yeah...i'd like to see me get nailed too...well...this week that is! lol and not on film
OH! I will be at glamourcon in may if anyone is going!
How about a compromise. Any chance you will be photographed or filmed while urinating? Yeah, I know. I'm a sick fuck.
And Prof V, I am sure your well-wishing for ERC finding a stud (or 3) to fulfill every desire is much appreciated but I would be shocked to no end if she doesn't have a boyfriend.
A girl like that is born with a boyfriend.
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
lol, that sounds quite naughty of you, Erica...
Awesome! Hope you have a great time there!
HUG thanks guys!
Yeah...i'd like to see me get nailed too...well...this week that is! lol and not on film
OH! I will be at glamourcon in may if anyone is going!
lol, that sounds quite naughty of you, Erica...
Awesome! Hope you have a great time there!
Sigh, this "reading into" what I say is what I'm talking about ...
More seriously now, I do not try to assume anything. Why you did, I don't know.
That's why I stated ...
"that chance, irresistible stud (or two, or three for that matter)"
What it means is left to Erica. It could be that "chance, irresistible stud" is just her boyfriend in a "chance situation." God knows I still treat my wife as "my fling" at times, using similar phrases, often to the shock of people (until they realize I'm talking about my wife). My wife and I really enjoy saying that (especially when others complain about us "still being honeymooners," and not always jokingly, but either out of dislike or just envy).
If it's "two or three," then that's what it is. I will not assume whether she has an open relationship, or a playful one with any boyfriend, or what not. It's left to whatever reality she has, and that's why I put them in parenthesis. They could also taken as "playful" or "however many men it takes to satisfy you."
As you've heard me state in other threads, if my wife wanted more lovers in the bedroom, I love her enough to give into such. I'd find a way to enjoy her with that situation. I love her because of her and want to see her fantasies fulfilled, whatever they may be. And I don't want to reciprocate, the one woman I have chosen is enough for me, because I know only she will satisfy me completely (and no one else can). People have demonized and questioned that, but I know my love as well as my lust.
It wouldn't surprise me if someone like Erica had a man who felt the same way, as even some hardcore pornstars have husbands. At the same time, Erica may be like my wife and enjoys only one man (and the base reason she doesn't do hardcore on film, let alone he must feel as special because of it as I do my wife). Whatever her reality is, I'm not going to assume, and I leave it to be for her and her only. If she wants to share what it is, fine. But until then, I make zero assumptions. I can make playful, open statements, and leave them to be because they apply to any situation.
Remember, keep in my mind the last statement I made in my very first, recent post ...
"We honestly have to stop judging and start seeking out how other people, individually, feel and adhere to that and that alone, on an individual basis."
I make very broad statements when it comes to matters of pleasure. I hope everyone can let them impact them individually as they see fit. Why people are so determined to interpret, question and otherwise "read into" them here, is beyond me. But it at least reminds myself that I'm somewhat of an open person in thought, at least in comparison to the assumptions of others (regardless of what they may think of themselves).
Just considerations for the future.
(Tongue-in-Cheek)But a boyfriend does not always equate monogamy.(Tongue-in-Cheek)
More seriously now, I do not try to assume anything. Why you did, I don't know.
That's why I stated ...
"that chance, irresistible stud (or two, or three for that matter)"
What it means is left to Erica. It could be that "chance, irresistible stud" is just her boyfriend in a "chance situation." God knows I still treat my wife as "my fling" at times, using similar phrases, often to the shock of people (until they realize I'm talking about my wife). My wife and I really enjoy saying that (especially when others complain about us "still being honeymooners," and not always jokingly, but either out of dislike or just envy).
If it's "two or three," then that's what it is. I will not assume whether she has an open relationship, or a playful one with any boyfriend, or what not. It's left to whatever reality she has, and that's why I put them in parenthesis. They could also taken as "playful" or "however many men it takes to satisfy you."
As you've heard me state in other threads, if my wife wanted more lovers in the bedroom, I love her enough to give into such. I'd find a way to enjoy her with that situation. I love her because of her and want to see her fantasies fulfilled, whatever they may be. And I don't want to reciprocate, the one woman I have chosen is enough for me, because I know only she will satisfy me completely (and no one else can). People have demonized and questioned that, but I know my love as well as my lust.
It wouldn't surprise me if someone like Erica had a man who felt the same way, as even some hardcore pornstars have husbands. At the same time, Erica may be like my wife and enjoys only one man (and the base reason she doesn't do hardcore on film, let alone he must feel as special because of it as I do my wife). Whatever her reality is, I'm not going to assume, and I leave it to be for her and her only. If she wants to share what it is, fine. But until then, I make zero assumptions. I can make playful, open statements, and leave them to be because they apply to any situation.
Remember, keep in my mind the last statement I made in my very first, recent post ...
"We honestly have to stop judging and start seeking out how other people, individually, feel and adhere to that and that alone, on an individual basis."
I make very broad statements when it comes to matters of pleasure. I hope everyone can let them impact them individually as they see fit. Why people are so determined to interpret, question and otherwise "read into" them here, is beyond me. But it at least reminds myself that I'm somewhat of an open person in thought, at least in comparison to the assumptions of others (regardless of what they may think of themselves).
Just considerations for the future.
Ack, I think I over-react ...
Peter Gazinya, sorry if I over-reacted. I still wanted to make my point, but I now realize that you were just talking as well. Sorry.
Peter Gazinya, sorry if I over-reacted. I still wanted to make my point, but I now realize that you were just talking as well. Sorry.
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
that's alright man. Do you have a voice activated keyboard?
that's alright man. Do you have a voice activated keyboard?
Re: Erica Campbell / Erica Rose Campbell
i love the fantasy sets too
and since we are guessing about my love life I will tell you
I am a one man kind of gal. I havent had a bunch of partners because I like rice krispies for breakfast every day I LIKE being with the same person. In relationships and in bed
My last serious relationship ended because I was cheated on. YUCK!
I like relationships and don't USUALLY have sex outside of a serious one I'm kind of a prude until I get to the bedroom point...and then pretty much anything goes!
lol no I won't be peeing on film anytime soon.
i love the fantasy sets too
and since we are guessing about my love life I will tell you
I am a one man kind of gal. I havent had a bunch of partners because I like rice krispies for breakfast every day
I LIKE being with the same person. In relationships and in bedMy last serious relationship ended because I was cheated on. YUCK!
I like relationships and don't USUALLY have sex outside of a serious one I'm kind of a prude until I get to the bedroom point...and then pretty much anything goes!
lol no I won't be peeing on film anytime soon.