Election 2008

McBama or O' Cain?


  • Total voters
    278
What's more is -

What is this "change" they're talking about ?

Just thought that I'd be the first to ask :1orglaugh

"Change" is a term thrown around routinely during elections.Especially if almost everyone does not want to be associated with what has proceded that election.That is the case now, one thing almost everyone is agreed on is they want something very different than what GWB represents.But the word change should not be enough I would hope that people demand to hear specifically what changes each candidate thinks are most important and why.
 
What's more is -

What is this "change" they're talking about ?

Just thought that I'd be the first to ask :1orglaugh

The "change" I am referring to is this mindset that comes about from a bunch of old white, rich ****** fuckers hosing the government up in Washington. We need some young, fresh ***** up there to stir up the pot a bit.
 
The "change" I am referring to is this mindset that comes about from a bunch of old white, rich ****** fuckers hosing the government up in Washington. We need some young, fresh ***** up there to stir up the pot a bit.


. . . but any fresh new ***** ? steady there ! ;)

BTW - I'm afraid that a domineering majority of our "reps"

are filthy, wealthy bastids. Certainly they don't work for the $150,000 annual chump change that they would like you to believe. :glugglug:

On the "Huck" - He may just be out there in the -> center <- of it all. I haven't see him passionate about any one certain item. My fear is that the Clintons have him bought and paid for. lol
 
. . . but any fresh new ***** ? steady there ! ;)

BTW - I'm afraid that a domineering majority of our "reps"

are filthy, wealthy bastids. Certainly they don't work for the $150,000 annual chump change that they would like you to believe. :glugglug:

Oh, I know that last part. ;)
 
Personally, I could vote for either Clinton or Obama, though I'd prefer Obama. I think he represents the younger generation a bit more, and I think he'd probably bring about more change than Clinton would.

I personally find it laughable that anyone who frequents a porn board would vote for someone like a Huckabee. If he gets elected, he's one of those who'll do everything in his power to get rid of pornography. Ironic, much?

What did George W. Bush do to get rid of pornography? Huckabee wouldn't do a thing to stop it. There would be no legal merit for that position.
 
I would either vote for Mike Huckabee or Hillary Clinton

Yes. That makes total sense. The two of them have so much in common :rolleyes:

Just an FYI for all u Obama supporters out there.
did you know that obama was muslim?

Thanks so much for the FYI. Too bad your "I" is wrong.

the faith that wants to destroy america?

Does it now? ALL of muslim, you say? And just which ****-mongering media douchebag sold you this bill of goods?
 
That is totally false about Obama. That is just a bunch of racist people who dont want obama to win.
 
Well it was a bad day for my boy John Edwards...I think he's reached the end of the line. I'm not exactly sure how the voting for the caucuses in Nevada worked but however it did go, it did not go well enough for him to continue on. He's already in 3rd place in South Carolina now. I'm sure Obama's good showing in Nevada will sew up South Carolina for him....

I think there will be some interesting shakeout in the Repub side...will Fred Thompson and Huckabee bow out if they don't win today?
 
Well it was a bad day for my boy John Edwards...I think he's reached the end of the line. I'm not exactly sure how the voting for the caucuses in Nevada worked but however it did go, it did not go well enough for him to continue on. He's already in 3rd place in South Carolina now. I'm sure Obama's good showing in Nevada will sew up South Carolina for him....

I think there will be some interesting shakeout in the Repub side...will Fred Thompson and Huckabee bow out if they don't win today?

Think unfortunately you are probably right about Edwards.Did you hear Obama said something like Reagan getting elected in 80 was "transformational" and that the pubs have had all the new ideas for the last 10-15 years,what a smuck.I am to the point that anybody and I guess that means Hillary is preferable to him IMO.I have been wondering about Thompson recently.Supposedly he is a good friend of McCain and I have been wondering if he is really just about trying to draw votes away from Huckabee thereby throwing states like SC to McCain.:dunno:
 
Think unfortunately you are probably right about Edwards.Did you hear Obama said something like Reagan getting elected in 80 was "transformational" and that the pubs have had all the new ideas for the last 10-15 years,what a smuck.I am to the point that anybody and I guess that means Hillary is preferable to him IMO.I have been wondering about Thompson recently.Supposedly he is a good friend of McCain and I have been wondering if he is really just about trying to draw votes away from Huckabee thereby throwing states like SC to McCain.:dunno:

Yes I heard that. It made me wonder if Obama has the "resilience" to make it through Feb 4/Super Tuesday. Did you hear his wife make a horrific blunder the other day when she gave a speech in Nevada and thought she was in South Carolina...:rolleyes: That mistake and Obama's Reagan comments are "rookie" mistakes.

Hillary wrapped up the Women vote and that was able to counter the Union support. I wonder how many women voters are there in South Carolina? Can she win that one?

I think Edwards will bail after South Carolina. It would seem strange to quit right before that one.

I don't think Hillary would invite him into her Cabinet. I could see him as Obama's Atty General or Sect of Commerce?
 
Well Al Sharpton has recently said he hasn't made up his mind between Hilary or Barak...So I,m gonna go with whomever he chooses to support because after all he seems like an honest, unbiased, legitimate type of guy.
 
I went to the Las Vegas caucus in my precinct today and there were only 3 people under the age of 50 that I could see. Out of the 147 people that attended 99 were for Hilbilly 5 for Edwards and 43 for Obama. You needed 25 people to have a delegate. The 5 for Edwards moved over to Obama. I think that its sad that more young people did not attend.
 
I went to the Las Vegas caucus in my precinct today and there were only 3 people under the age of 50 that I could see. Out of the 147 people that attended 99 were for Hilbilly 5 for Edwards and 43 for Obama. You needed 25 people to have a delegate. The 5 for Edwards moved over to Obama. I think that its sad that more young people did not attend.

Wow:eek: Thanks for the onsite intel...what was your opinion about who would win? The last poll I saw had Hilly in a 2% lead over Obama and 4% lead over Edwards...it was very tight...

Nevada is supposed to have a lot of sub-50 year olds...as well as retirees of course...Nevada was one of the highest growth states for years...
 
Wow Thanks for the onsite intel...what was your opinion about who would win? The last poll I saw had Hilly in a 2% lead over Obama and 4% lead over Edwards...it was very tight...


When they divided us into our groups you could tell who the winner was going to be with out even taking a vote. I was hoping that this was just from my caucus area. With the culinary union giving support to Obama and having caucus sites at 5 hotels I thought that Obama would of done better.
Hilbilly took 51% to Obama's 45%
Premium Link Upgrade
 
Back
Top