Yes, I would. First and foremost, he'd be the alternative to the democrat ticket. And from what I remember at the time, albeit from the other end of the country, he seemed like an effective governor. Those on the left would probably disagree, but he is looked at as a moderate with his stances on immigration and education in particular. He's definitely more moderate than who he'll likely be facing in the primaries. Part of it is curiosity; I want to see how that would work out and if that would lessen the acrimony in Washington. And if he did turn out to be a disastrous one-termer then I think that would settle that argument at least. I think he's going to be the eventual nominee regardless. He's got too much money backing him not to be.
Jeb Bush doesn't repulse me, but he's got an albatross around his neck for a last name. Your first and foremost reason is pretty lame, "he'd be the alternative to the democrat ticket", yeah, that's pretty much a given, but shouldn't a race be about more than just R or D, unless you just automatically dislike anyone that's a democrat,
I find it hard to fathom that you're that tied to a party or label.
Jeb has an uphill battle, but if he ends up running against Hillary, now pay attention, he might be able to pull off an upset. If Jeb Bush ran the right kind of campaign he could lure swing votes and Hillary haters away from the Democratic ticket. He would really fuck up if he choose a teabagger for a running mate, though.
It's more than a label, there's a difference in platforms. Otherwise, I'd still be liberal/democrat. And the thing with the names, yeah, it looks bad to still have Bush vs. Clinton 2 decades later but I think that's superficial. Judge each of them on their own merits. And if it bothers someone that much, don't vote for either of them. If both Bush and Clinton win their respective nominations it's because the voters chose them. I don't think that'd be an upset. Just the opposite. And I think the effect the running mate has (positive or negative) is overrated. I mean look at Joe Biden.
Jeb Bush could win a lot of the independent vote for sure. He seems to be liked by the left a lot more than his brother was and the only thing I can think of is that many must believe he is cut more from the cloth of his father. They will sing his praises now hoping he gets the nomination and once he does they will cut him to pieces. The ads against him in October 2016 will be as if GWB is running again.
The Repubs need to nominate a Conservative if they hope to have any chance of winning.
But x-man the moderates have been the kiss o' death for the GOP the past two presidential elections.
I have a difficult time taking the advice from Democrats that would never vote Republican no matter who they nominated.
I have a difficult time taking the advice from Democrats that would never vote Republican no matter who they nominated.
You're not talking about me, I would definitely vote for a moderate centrist Republican that didn't go batshit insane about "liberals", and I don't want to speak for Mayhem, but I doubt that he would never vote for a republican. If anything I'm fucking pragmatic, nominate a candidate that doesn't go off the rails wingnut crazy and I'll vote for them.
Romney's VP pick sunk him for me.
Dude, Uncle Joe is our VP. I actually pray that nothing happens to Obama. Just like if McCain would have won, I was going to make a 500 dollar donation to Melanoma research.
That's why I don't worry about the GOP actually trying to impeach Obama, they're more worried about Joe Biden than they are about the darkie in the White House. Seriously though, I wasn't kidding, nominate a moderate centrist Republican that doesn't pick a far right tea party person as their running mate and I'll gladly vote for that candidate over Hillary Clinton.