ATF: Skinhead Plot to Assassinate Obama Foiled

girk1

Closed Account
and lets not mention that England abolished slavery years upon years upon years before the USA even considered it

Yes Hoodoo Britain ,Spain,Argentina,Mexico,Brazil(British possessionsetc..... Dozens upon dozens of countries & possessions ended slavery without a Civil War through intelligent diplomacy unlike America. Reminds me of how the war in Iraq would never have been fought had we a thoughtful Statesman like Gore in power. It makes me sad when I see the pathetic figure that is Bush & what could have been with Gore.:crying:
 
if obama was taken down right before the election, god knows what will happen. the democracts will be so angry, this country could plunge into a civil war and they will demand a reelection.

Just curious but how would they run a reelection on someone who had been killed? ;)

But hey, at least it would be a quick war because the Dems all have no guns and all the Repubs do. :thefinger

For the record, I think the small-minded white supremacist bastard-ass retards that were plotting this should be put in a maximum security prison so some racial "integration" could take place. :nannerf1:

I still haven't seen anyone in the MSM explain why skin color is either a qualification or a disqualification for anything.:yinyang:
 
I still haven't seen anyone in the MSM explain why skin color is either a qualification or a disqualification for anything.:yinyang:


Why would anyone in the MSM or anyone else feel the need to explain something like that? Has Obama or his supporters said being black is a qualification? But I do think there has been some attempts to try to make Obama's race an issue from the other side as a disqualification.It really hasn't been very effective IMO.And while there is nothing in writing about race being a qualification for being eligible for the Presidency the history of the position is that it has always been held by a white,actually almost exclusively white anglo saxon protestants ( Kennedy being the lone exception to that) so McCain might like that to be seen as a qualification.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Second, I guess you've never heard of the vikings, who were here before "Native" Americans ever were (documented skeletal remains prove this so don't even try arguing it).

OK, genius, I won't argue it. How about I just prove what total bullshit that claim is instead:

http://www.americanwest.com/pages/indians.htm

Excerpt:

"The oldest documented Indian cultures in North America are Sandia (15000 BC), Clovis (12000 BC) and Folsom (8000 BC)."

Documented research has shown that Leif Ericsson and his crew arrived on the NE shore of North American sometime around 1000 AD.

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1000Vinland.html

There are plenty of other references that back this up. Please do some research before you try to pass yourself off as an authority on subjects like this.
 
OK, genius, I won't argue it. How about I just prove what total bullshit that claim is instead:

http://www.americanwest.com/pages/indians.htm

Excerpt:

"The oldest documented Indian cultures in North America are Sandia (15000 BC), Clovis (12000 BC) and Folsom (8000 BC)."

Documented research has shown that Leif Ericsson and his crew arrived on the NE shore of North American sometime around 1000 AD.

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1000Vinland.html

There are plenty of other references that back this up. Please do some research before you try to pass yourself off as an authority on subjects like this.

Good one Jagger ,I missed that silly claim by the stormfront rep.Erickson and company visited before the lost Italian guy stumbled upon it in 1492 but here before the indians is just a funny claim.:rofl:
 
Yes Hoodoo Britain ,Spain,Argentina,Mexico,Brazil(British possessionsetc..... Dozens upon dozens of countries & possessions ended slavery without a Civil War through intelligent diplomacy unlike America. Reminds me of how the war in Iraq would never have been fought had we a thoughtful Statesman like Gore in power. It makes me sad when I see the pathetic figure that is Bush & what could have been with Gore.:crying:

oh wow...i didn't know it was that many that abolished it in the same manner as england.....i hope this next president we get will not make a fool out of the rest of the world....like W did
 
This is a tough topic for some

Why would anyone in the MSM or anyone else feel the need to explain something like that? Has Obama or his supporters said being black is a qualification?

Friday...are you seriously gonna say that there will not be an increase in "black" voters in this race? And likewise, that the majority of those will vote for Obama?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081023/ap_on_el_pr/early_voting

Surveys indicate "black" voting sympathy in the US Military are a polar opposite from the overall military vote. Whites, hispanics, male, female, enlisted, officer, etc. all fall much closer with the overall yet the "black" vote is flip opposite.

http://www.militarytimes.com/static/projects/pages/081003_ep_2pp.pdf

Are you seriously gonna sit there and accept the belief that somehow these voters are somehow more enlightened than all the rest of us or have some information/education about the issues that all the rest of us don't have?

Ask yourself this -- Why did Oprah Winfrey, a champion of both women and black causes, endorse Barack BEFORE the Democratic Primary was over? Hmmm...she had to make a choice between a woman and an African-American and before the issues had even really been discussed, and while most thought Hillary was a shoe-in, she endorsed Obama.

But I do think there has been some attempts to try to make Obama's race an issue from the other side as a disqualification.It really hasn't been very effective IMO.And while there is nothing in writing about race being a qualification for being eligible for the Presidency the history of the position is that it has always been held by a white,actually almost exclusively white anglo saxon protestants ( Kennedy being the lone exception to that) so McCain might like that to be seen as a qualification.

The two references I gave above, from non-McCain sources, indicate it is not "the other side" that is making this an issue, but rather the voters that are indeed making it an issue. The "left" is simply using that old Jedi mind trick and deflecting it to make it look like it is the "right" that is causing this.

The MAJORITY of these voters are voting for one reason and one reason alone...skin color. And it's happening the other direction too. There are "non-blacks" that will vote against Obama because of his skin color.

Now before you freak out, I am African-American. My simple point throughout this entire deal is that people are voting based on race...not on reasons.

Ya' know what, I have absolutely no problem with a "Black" man becoming President of the United States...nor a White, Hispanic, Oriental, Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Athiest, Protestant, Buddhist, etc. They simply are not qualifying nor disqualifying criteria. But people on both sides are treating it as such.

That's why I hope these brain-trusts that were plotting these chicken-shit attacks and assassination attempt spend the rest of their lives getting ass-raped in federal prison.

I will say it again. Race is neither a qualification nor a disqualification. IT SHOULD NOT EVEN BE A FUCKING ISSUE, but until people quit voting based on their skin color (white, black, yellow, purple) racism will be alive everywhere...and yes, us African-Americans (blacks) can be racist too.

Some may argue that Barack Obama may not get elected due to racism. There is equal supporting evidence he may in fact BE ELECTED due to racism. For such a civilized nation, we still prove ourselves to be of a very basic mindset.

OFF-TOPIC...OMG I can't believe Oprah has a freeones page!!! :eek:
 
Top