An Unstable Limbaugh Blames Obama for Ft. Hood Shootings

I'm somewhat at a loss when attempting to grasp what it is that you are trying to convey here. I'm posting on a pornography website. It's a thread discussing the outpourings of a balloon headed buffoon in relation to the latest 'nontroversy' concerning the Obama administration. I'm responding to the repetitive, infantile, nonsensical, illiterate and personally insulting posts of Georges and you come on here like the style police at a fashion event to tell me I'm doing it wrong. You might be taking yourself a little too seriously. A bit.

I'm more than happy to post on here with footnotes and references to back up the points being made. I have indeed done so. Also, I have repeatedly asked to be pointed to just one article penned by any of the infotainment crowd that sets out a coherent argument and backs it up with relevant data. I've never had a reply. (Feel free to get me one peer reviewed article by Beck Hannity O'Reilly or Limbaugh - they must have 80 years of pontificating between there must be thousnads of brilliant articles out there.)I quickly realised that I was pissing in the wind. Someone like Georges is never going to read a serious book, never mind understand it. He has made up his mind on all the issues for the next seven years. He doesn't need evidence.

So I just have some fun on here. Apparently you don't like it. Fair enough. I'm still stuck though, because I consider Rush Limbaugh a master of his medium: the Phineas T Barnum of his age. Consequently I have to tell you that when an adult comes on here who takes him seriously, I picture them wearing a big red nose, with a revolving bow tie and a plastic flower that squirts water. In replying to that, what else can you do but mock?

Damn!!! MJ are you sure I'm not you?:rofl:

Someone like Georges is never going to read a serious book, never mind understand it. He has made up his mind on all the issues for the next seven years. He doesn't need evidence.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

<*GASP! GASP!*> I can't breathe....I can't breathe....
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
I'm somewhat at a loss when attempting to grasp what it is that you are trying to convey here. I'm posting on a pornography website. It's a thread discussing the outpourings of a balloon headed buffoon in relation to the latest 'nontroversy' concerning the Obama administration. I'm responding to the repetitive, infantile, nonsensical, illiterate and personally insulting posts of Georges and you come on here like the style police at a fashion event to tell me I'm doing it wrong. You Might be taking yourself a little too seriously. A bit.

I'm more than happy to post on here with footnotes and references to back up the points being made. I have indeed done so. Also, I have repeatedly asked to be pointed to just one article penned by any of the infotainment crowd that sets out a coherent argument and backs it up with relevant data. I've never had a reply. (Feel free to get me one peer reviewed article by Beck Hannity O'Reilly or Limbaugh - they must have 80 years of pontificating between there must be thousnads of brilliant articles out there.)I quickly realised that I was pissing in the wind. Someone like Georges is never going to read a serious book, never mind understand it. He has made up his mind on all the issues for the next seven years. He doesn't need evidence.

So I just have some fun on here. Apparently you don't like it. Fair enough. I'm still stuck though, because I consider Rush Limbaugh a master of his medium: the Phineas T Barnum of his age. Consequently I have to tell you that when an adult comes on here who takes him seriously, I picture them wearing a big red nose, with a revolving bow tie and a plastic flower that squirts water. In replying to that, what else can you do but mock?

Because Obama is not abuffon, come on you would knee in front of him and his czars. The one who makes infantile, senseless and unproven accusations and provocation is you from the very beginning.You think you are more litterate than me or others, who are you taking yourself for? Do not try to lecture me and don't tell me I am not litterate because we haven't got the same educational level and certainly not the same salary. When you accuse me of something, make yourself sure to have proofs of what you are talking about. I trust this is clear. I am not taking myself too seriously but I seriously think you need to be put at your place and honestly weight your words when you are openly lieing on people. I will not let you harrass me or other people by spreading lies on them, and on that count me, I will not let it go. You can be sure of that.

Tell me who take your so called facts seriously? Aside hot mega, fomm and fk maybe some hardcore obama fans who believes you???? Not many people. Before making any misleading claims whether I had read a book, make yourself sure that I have not read any because it is blattant a lie. I have read more books than you can imagine so before claiming anything get your facts straight.

Look at yourself, you should perhaps lough about your own mediocrity and unability to have any sense of logic and realism. But I guess I can't make you smart, I only have a real pleasure to see you guetting yourself miserable kinda like a tramp begging for money.
 
Because Obama is not abuffon, come on you would knee in front of him and his czars. The one who makes infantile, senseless and unproven accusations and provocation is you from the very beginning.You think you are more litterate than me or others, who are you taking yourself for? Do not try to lecture me and don't tell me I am not litterate because we haven't got the same educational level and certainly not the same salary. When you accuse me of something, make yourself sure to have proofs of what you are talking about. I trust this is clear. I am not taking myself too seriously but I seriously think you need to be put at your place and honestly weight your words when you are openly lieing on people. I will not let you harrass me or other people by spreading lies on them, and on that count me, I will not let it go. You can be sure of that.

Tell me who take your so called facts seriously? Aside hot mega, fomm and fk maybe some hardcore obama fans who believes you???? Not many people. Before making any misleading claims whether I had read a book, make yourself sure that I have not read any because it is blattant a lie. I have read more books than you can imagine so before claiming anything get your facts straight.
Look at yourself, you should perhaps lough about your own mediocrity and unability to have any sense of logic and realism. But I guess I can't make you smart, I only have a real pleasure to see you guetting yourself miserable kinda like a tramp begging for money.

Penthouse and Hustler don't count.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Penthouse and Hustler don't count.

See you just spread bs.
here are the books I read recently:
The Great Depression Ahead by Harry Dent
New Deal or Raw Deal by Burton Folsom Jnr
Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin
The World Is Flat...A Critical Analysis by Ronald Aronica
The War within by Bob Woodward
The Trillion Dollar Meltdown by Charles R Morris
Wilderness of Mirrors: Intrigue, Deception, and the Secrets that Destroyed Two of the Cold War's Most Important Agents, by David C. Martin
Eyeball to Eyeball: The Inside Story of the Cuban Missile Crisis, by Dino A. Brugioni.
The Man Who Kept the Secrets: Richard Helms and the CIA, by Thomas Powers.
The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA, by John Ranelagh
The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, by Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks.
and it is just a small list of the many books I have read.

and you what have you read sodomag? swank hardcore?:1orglaugh
 
See you just spread bs.
here are the books I read recently:
The Great Depression Ahead by Harry Dent
New Deal or Raw Deal by Burton Folsom Jnr
Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin
The World Is Flat...A Critical Analysis by Ronald Aronica
The War within by Bob Woodward
The Trillion Dollar Meltdown by Charles R Morris
Wilderness of Mirrors: Intrigue, Deception, and the Secrets that Destroyed Two of the Cold War's Most Important Agents, by David C. Martin
Eyeball to Eyeball: The Inside Story of the Cuban Missile Crisis, by Dino A. Brugioni.
The Man Who Kept the Secrets: Richard Helms and the CIA, by Thomas Powers.
The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA, by John Ranelagh
The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, by Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks.
and it is just a small list of the many books I have read.

and you what have you read sodomag? swank hardcore?:1orglaugh

:wave2: I recently read "See Sid Sit" and one other coloring book (Do color by number books count? I mean I do have to actually keep track of what color applies to what number.:o)
 
See you just spread bs.
here are the books I read recently:
The Great Depression Ahead by Harry Dent
New Deal or Raw Deal by Burton Folsom Jnr
Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin
The World Is Flat...A Critical Analysis by Ronald Aronica
The War within by Bob Woodward
The Trillion Dollar Meltdown by Charles R Morris
Wilderness of Mirrors: Intrigue, Deception, and the Secrets that Destroyed Two of the Cold War's Most Important Agents, by David C. Martin
Eyeball to Eyeball: The Inside Story of the Cuban Missile Crisis, by Dino A. Brugioni.
The Man Who Kept the Secrets: Richard Helms and the CIA, by Thomas Powers.
The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA, by John Ranelagh
The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, by Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks.
and it is just a small list of the many books I have read.

and you what have you read sodomag? swank hardcore?:1orglaugh

At the risk of seeming harsh, if you are so magnificently well read why are your posts so poorly written? For example you said this,

"You think you are more litterate than me"

and this

"you should perhaps lough about your own mediocrity and unability to have any sense of logic and realism"

Let me be perfectly clear , the one thing I never ever lough about is unability.


Mostly I read books on education because I have to. For fun I mostly read fiction. I did read a lot of books about political theory back in the day.

This man was in charge of the department where I studied. He gave the very first lecture I attended as an undergraduate. If you like I can recommend some of his work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Giddens

and this is where he taught me

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faculty_of_Politics,_Psychology,_Sociology_and_International_Studies
 
^^^ Mrs. Jolly, did you just pull a shameless name-drop and Cambridge boast?

You're on a forum at a free porn site, so pulling those cards (as solid as they may be) is kind of overkill, isn't it - like using a chainsaw to cut butter? Your superior arguments and rhetorical skills (as well as spelling, syntax, and grammar knowledge) are enough to speak for themselves, or at least I'd think so.

Still, I agree with most of what you say here! ;)


And georges' list looks like it was probably cut and pasted from The Conservative Book Club.
 
I'm somewhat at a loss when attempting to grasp what it is that you are trying to convey here. I'm posting on a pornography website. It's a thread discussing the outpourings of a balloon headed buffoon in relation to the latest 'nontroversy' concerning the Obama administration. I'm responding to the repetitive, infantile, nonsensical, illiterate and personally insulting posts of Georges and you come on here like the style police at a fashion event to tell me I'm doing it wrong. You might be taking yourself a little too seriously. A bit.

I'm more than happy to post on here with footnotes and references to back up the points being made. I have indeed done so. Also, I have repeatedly asked to be pointed to just one article penned by any of the infotainment crowd that sets out a coherent argument and backs it up with relevant data. I've never had a reply. (Feel free to get me one peer reviewed article by Beck Hannity O'Reilly or Limbaugh - they must have 80 years of pontificating between there must be thousnads of brilliant articles out there.)I quickly realised that I was pissing in the wind. Someone like Georges is never going to read a serious book, never mind understand it. He has made up his mind on all the issues for the next seven years. He doesn't need evidence.

So I just have some fun on here. Apparently you don't like it. Fair enough. I'm still stuck though, because I consider Rush Limbaugh a master of his medium: the Phineas T Barnum of his age. Consequently I have to tell you that when an adult comes on here who takes him seriously, I picture them wearing a big red nose, with a revolving bow tie and a plastic flower that squirts water. In replying to that, what else can you do but mock?



:glugglug: nice,

i would echo what has previously been said, that rush et al are the biggest bunch of shit talking hypocrites out there

- jon stewart caught out fox (hannity i think it was) the other night - they were reporting a tea party event in washington, and using footage from an entirely different event to suggest more folks were there than was actually the case

finally, to say one think about georges - my understanding is that he is posting in his second language,
and his english is way, way better than my french :)
 
And georges' list looks like it was probably cut and pasted from The Conservative Book Club.

"The Conservative Book Club" (for kindergarteners at that). :1orglaugh
 
Guilty. It is not all it is cracked up to be. As a program it lives in the shadow of PPE at Oxford, which is thedegree to have for those in this field. I will tell you that it was 65/35 girls to boys and that because of the weird way Cambridge breaks down into individual colleges, my director of studies was based at Newnham College - which is an all girls college. That's right, for 3 years I did all my tutorials in a womens college. Golden times.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
"The Conservative Book Club" (for kindergarteners at that). :1orglaugh

oh yeah really funny :lame: I am far more grown up than you and at least I don't need to ask others to pay my social security unlike you. I guess you have never been an individualistic person, you always shared with others. I prefer individiualists than socialists and communists grieving idiots who have not their places in a capitalist country.
I wonder what you are reading perhaps these books:
Reason: Why Liberals Will Win the Battle for America by: Robert B. Reich
Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life by: Robert B. Reich
The Future of Success: Working and Living in the New Economy by: Robert B. Reich
I'll Be Short: Essentials for a Decent Working Society by: Robert B. Reich
A typical "liberal book collection" (for the fucking "un"american and communist people who are ungrateful and unthankful towards America and who believe in the Obama messiah).:thefinger
 
oh yeah really funny :lame: I am far more grown up than you and at least I don't need to ask others to pay my social security unlike you. I guess you have never been an individualistic person, you always shared with others. I prefer individiualists than socialists and communists grieving idiots who have not their places in a capitalist country.
I wonder what you are reading perhaps these books:
Reason: Why Liberals Will Win the Battle for America by: Robert B. Reich
Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life by: Robert B. Reich
The Future of Success: Working and Living in the New Economy by: Robert B. Reich
I'll Be Short: Essentials for a Decent Working Society by: Robert B. Reich
A typical "liberal book collection" (for the fucking "un"american and communist people who are ungrateful and unthankful towards America and who believe in the Obama messiah).:thefinger

Georges as individualistic as you claim to be you sure seem to rely on the writings of others to tell you what and how to think. That's you're problem IMO.

Do your own thinking and you'll not only avoid asserting absurd, stupid and child-like statements....you'll likely end up making more sense.:2 cents::thumbsup:
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
1) Georges as individualistic as you claim to be you sure seem to rely on the writings of others to tell you what and how to think. That's you're problem IMO.

2) Do your own thinking and you'll not only avoid asserting absurd, stupid and child-like statements....you'll likely end up making more sense.:2 cents::thumbsup:

1) Not really, I always rely myself on life experience and on my own intelligence. I don't need the words of others to tell me what I should write or think.

2) Oh really because you think that you make sense? Please don't make yourself more ridiculous than you are. Who the hell is naive as 5 years old child and who believes everything that iw written in the press or in the liberal media??? You. So before giving moral lessons to anyone else, apply them to yourself.
 
1) Not really, I always rely myself on life experience and on my own intelligence. I don't need the words of others to tell me what I should write or think.

2) Oh really because you think that you make sense? Please don't make yourself more ridiculous than you are. Who the hell is naive as 5 years old child and who believes everything that iw written in the press or in the liberal media??? You. So before giving moral lessons to anyone else, apply them to yourself.

Georges it wasn't a moral lesson. Based on what you post here sometimes, it was the soundest advice ever offered to you probably in your life.

Also, I believe things the way a five year child would??? Who's the slobber-knocker on the forum posting idiocy about Obama's so called fake birth certificate using the "logic" and "wisdom" of some goof on youtube???

Are you kidding??:wave:
 

Philbert

Banned
It is the rhythmns of your language George. Well, that coupled with the way you constantly have trouble with the idioms.

I was working from the notion that the above information in said form would be boring to impart, so I pretended you that you translated out of and back into English. Obviously, it has escaped your notice that this was a pale stab at humour on my behalf. The failure is mine. The shame will be with me always.

In the light of the previous paragraph, I risk redundancy when I state that I'm fully cognizant that the ravings you post on here are all your own work. I do though, envision you writing them out in crayon first, before typing them up with your index finger. Your other hand fingering the remote. Pausing to switch channels from Spongebob Squarepants when it goes to commercial.

Once again, you are trying to work out your severe disappointment in life at turning out to be a small minded careerless overeducated know-nothing, and actually once again your off the wall assumptions (wrong as usual) show how sad an end you are coming to. Wasting all your ability to write wordier and wordier, nasty put-downs of those you yourself claim are not up to any higher level of actualization shows how little you not only think of your self (I concur with that opinion) but your basic scorn towards most every member of FreeOnes.
BTW...Georges is French, and his English is excellent for a non native speaker who lives in another country that is non-English speaking.
Most of what you write is a overdone attempt at insulting someone's honest opinion...Georges has at least something to say, unlike yourself.
Do you have some age-related problem, not getting respect for how old you are from all those younger than yourself that pay you no attention or respect? A failed academic or unpromoted teacher? I assure you I don't care, you're nasty and deserve any failure you are experiencing.
You seem to constantly try to put people down using age-related insults...you are the only one who thinks Georges is a childish person, and we have been around him much longer than you have been here.
A bitter old person...yuchh! Why are you here? Looking for easy targets? :crash:
 
Once again, you are trying to work out your severe disappointment in life at turning out to be a small minded careerless overeducated know-nothing, and actually once again your off the wall assumptions (wrong as usual) show how sad an end you are coming to. Wasting all your ability to write wordier and wordier, nasty put-downs of those you yourself claim are not up to any higher level of actualization shows how little you not only think of your self (I concur with that opinion) but your basic scorn towards most every member of FreeOnes.
BTW...Georges is French, and his English is excellent for a non native speaker who lives in another country that is non-English speaking.
Most of what you write is a overdone attempt at insulting someone's honest opinion...Georges has at least something to say, unlike yourself.
Do you have some age-related problem, not getting respect for how old you are from all those younger than yourself that pay you no attention or respect? A failed academic or unpromoted teacher? I assure you I don't care, you're nasty and deserve any failure you are experiencing.
You seem to constantly try to put people down using age-related insults...you are the only one who thinks Georges is a childish person, and we have been around him much longer than you have been here.

Poor Philby....:2offtopicparagraph after paragraph and not one single mention of the topic of the thread but attack after attack on another poster.

A bitter old person...yuchh! Why are you here? Looking for easy targets? :crash:

Hmmmmm.....I'm beginning to thin....uh, never mind.:thumbsup:

BTW, have an opinion on Rush insinuating Obama being responsible for the Ft. Hood attack?
 

Philbert

Banned
Once again, you are trying to work out your severe disappointment in life at turning out to be a small minded careerless overeducated know-nothing, and actually once again your off the wall assumptions (wrong as usual) show how sad an end you are coming to. Wasting all your ability to write wordier and wordier, nasty put-downs of those you yourself claim are not up to any higher level of actualization shows how little you not only think of your self (I concur with that opinion) but your basic scorn towards most every member of FreeOnes.
BTW...Georges is French, and his English is excellent for a non native speaker who lives in another country that is non-English speaking.
Most of what you write is a overdone attempt at insulting someone's honest opinion...Georges has at least something to say, unlike yourself.
Do you have some age-related problem, not getting respect for how old you are from all those younger than yourself that pay you no attention or respect? A failed academic or unpromoted teacher? I assure you I don't care, you're nasty and deserve any failure you are experiencing.
You seem to constantly try to put people down using age-related insults...you are the only one who thinks Georges is a childish person, and we have been around him much longer than you have been here.
A bitter old person...yuchh! Why are you here? Looking for easy targets? :crash:


PS...HotMega doesn't count, he's not actually a real person.:1orglaugh
 
Top