*2016 US Presidential Elections* - Candidates, Statistics, Campaign Timelines, Debates

Republican ex-Treasury chief Paulson slams Trump, to vote for Clinton

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-paulson-idUSKCN0ZB00R

These "NeverTrumpers" are the lowest of the low cockroaches there are in this country today.


Do they have ANY idea how many SCJustices are on the line in the next 4-8 years?.....DO THEY? Do they know that if/when a Hillary Clinton is elected and the appointees she will put on the SCOTUS will essentially destroy America? Fuck them.


Fuck them, I hope their kids get hit by buses and they get terminal cancer, the fucks.
 

Mayhem

Banned
These "NeverTrumpers" are the lowest of the low cockroaches there are in this country today.


Do they have ANY idea how many SCJustices are on the line in the next 4-8 years?.....DO THEY? Do they know that if/when a Hillary Clinton is elected and the appointees she will put on the SCOTUS will essentially destroy America? Fuck them.


Fuck them, I hope their kids get hit by buses and they get terminal cancer, the fucks.

Well I take SC Judges seriously too. But sorry, the whole "destroy America" schtick is worn out. We've had 8 years for Obama to destroy America like you guys promised, it hasn't happened. Hillary won't either.
 
These "NeverTrumpers" are the lowest of the low cockroaches there are in this country today.


Do they have ANY idea how many SCJustices are on the line in the next 4-8 years?.....DO THEY? Do they know that if/when a Hillary Clinton is elected and the appointees she will put on the SCOTUS will essentially destroy America? Fuck them.


Fuck them, I hope their kids get hit by buses and they get terminal cancer, the fucks.


Yeah, I don't get that Never Trump thing either from those on the conservative side. It does come down to the Supremes. Congratulations, National Review, you can pat yourselves on the back for being principled conservatives while the balance of the supreme court flips for the next generation or more. I'm glad I cancelled my subscription to your shitty magazine years ago. I hope you felt that burn.
 
Well I take SC Judges seriously too. But sorry, the whole "destroy America" schtick is worn out. We've had 8 years for Obama to destroy America like you guys promised, it hasn't happened. Hillary won't either.

Well what the hell do you think he's been doing, and what has been happening in the last 8 years..? Financially, morally, and culturally America has been going straight down the shitter...



Hillary will take the torch of Obama's complete fuckary of this coinutry to the next level, make no mistake.



At least with Trump the SCJs will be solidified...that IN ITSELF is flat straight out a must vote for Trump reason enough.
 
Well what the hell do you think he's been doing, and what has been happening in the last 8 years..? Financially, morally, and culturally America has been going straight down the shitter...



Hillary will take the torch of Obama's complete fuckary of this coinutry to the next level, make no mistake.



At least with Trump the SCJs will be solidified...that IN ITSELF is flat straight out a must vote for Trump reason enough.

This sounds fun. Let's do this.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Well I take SC Judges seriously too. But sorry, the whole "destroy America" schtick is worn out. We've had 8 years for Obama to destroy America like you guys promised, it hasn't happened. Hillary won't either.

I'm sorry you and others think it's a schtik. Many people don't.
Do you get any information from other than those media companies that are all owned by the same handfull of people?
Just asking.
Obama has just continued the same path of self destruction started by those nice people from the Project for a New American Century that filled the Bush Administration (and still control things). He actually put it in high gear.
I mean not only have we continued occupying and destroying countries with Barry in office we're trying to provoke Syria Iran Russia and even China into war with him at the helm. Does anybody actually think this is Soetoros idea? He's a puppet all the way
Clinton is such a corrupt self serving bought and paid for NeoCon , she will put it in Warp Speed.

I used to defend Bush JR here a lot years back.
A wiser man than myself once said, "If I can change, you can change......everybody can change!".
 
I mean not only have we continued occupying and destroying countries with Barry in office we're trying to provoke Syria Iran Russia and even China into war with him at the helm.

I wish Obama would stop drone striking indiscriminately but that's another matter. You know what I love about this part? In this quote, we have Obama destroying countries. If you listen to other people, Obama just apologizes to everyone and we don't win anymore.
 
Do they have ANY idea how many SCJustices are on the line in the next 4-8 years?.....DO THEY? Do they know that if/when a Hillary Clinton is elected and the appointees she will put on the SCOTUS will essentially destroy America? Fuck them.

Have you seen the list of Trump's potential appointees? Yikes!

But apart from that, at least one of those seats could be filled by now by a man that even Orrin Hatch, the most senior Republican senator, suggested would be a fine appointee - Merrick Garland. That is until Obama actually appointed him, at which point Hatch and the rest of the Republican senate showed what truly truculent little children they are by refusing to even grant Garland a hearing :facepalm:

Well I take SC Judges seriously too. But sorry, the whole "destroy America" schtick is worn out. We've had 8 years for Obama to destroy America like you guys promised, it hasn't happened. Hillary won't either.

Exactly. Worn out is putting it mildly.
And a strikingly ironic result is that so many of those who've been peddling it incessantly ended up with Trump as a result, and are horrified at that outcome.

I mean not only have we continued occupying and destroying countries with Barry in office

We have? Last I looked we finally STOPPED occupying both Iraq and Afghanistan with Obama in office.

You know what I love about this part? In this quote, we have Obama destroying countries. If you listen to other people, Obama just apologizes to everyone and we don't win anymore.

Right. On the one hand he's a simpering apologist and a total pussy who cowers in Putin's shadow, yet somehow on the other he's going to aggressively head the Russian/Iranian/Chinese alliance that will take over the world! lol
 
I wish Obama would stop drone striking indiscriminately but that's another matter. You know what I love about this part? In this quote, we have Obama destroying countries. If you listen to other people, Obama just apologizes to everyone and we don't win anymore.

<coming to the defense of the Commander-in-Chief> how has he authorized drone strikes "indistcriminately"?

Unless you're privy to other information, all we've heard is that (insert taliban or al-qaeda leader or someone of consequence in their sphere) has been taken out by a drone strike. How is that indiscriminate? Barring a rifle sight with a laser pointer on a forehead, that's about as targeted as you can get. Or are you suggesting Obama is guilty of war crimes?
 

BCsSecretAlias

Closed Account
There are about 15 percent of those being polled that will be voting for Trump but are not being truthful with their answers.

He's in good shape.
 
There are about 15 percent of those being polled that will be voting for Trump but are not being truthful with their answers.

He's in good shape.

I guess we'll see if that silent majority is still a factor in November.

Those protesters burning American flags while waving Mexican ones and assaulting Trump supporters can only help. So keep it up.

I hope every last one of you gets deported. Sure, you'll stream right back across the border, but it's symbolic.
 
Have you seen the list of Trump's potential appointees? Yikes!

But apart from that, at least one of those seats could be filled by now by a man that even Orrin Hatch, the most senior Republican senator, suggested would be a fine appointee - Merrick Garland. That is until Obama actually appointed him, at which point Hatch and the rest of the Republican senate showed what truly truculent little children they are by refusing to even grant Garland a hearing l

Yikes? In what sense? They are staunch conservatives, upholders of the Constitution, unlike looney tunes leftists or progressives:

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...rumps-scotus-list-gives-america-clear-choice/

And Garland isn't reasonable at all, and a person's seniority in the Senate doesn't some how make them gospel speakers.


I guess we'll see if that silent majority is still a factor in November.

Those protesters burning American flags while waving Mexican ones and assaulting Trump supporters can only help. So keep it up.

I hope every last one of you gets deported. Sure, you'll stream right back across the border, but it's symbolic.

:clap:
 
<coming to the defense of the Commander-in-Chief> how has he authorized drone strikes "indistcriminately"?

Unless you're privy to other information, all we've heard is that (insert taliban or al-qaeda leader or someone of consequence in their sphere) has been taken out by a drone strike. How is that indiscriminate? Barring a rifle sight with a laser pointer on a forehead, that's about as targeted as you can get. Or are you suggesting Obama is guilty of war crimes?

The drone program is abhorrent. And illegal. The president can assassinate anyone he wants, anywhere in the world, at any time. Including American citizens. This is terrifying
 
Yikes? In what sense?

I'm not going to take the time to break them down one by one, in main because you wouldn't agree with my objections to them anyway, nor will anything I might point out alter your thinking.
I guess they're just peachy if you believe, among other things, in no abortions under any circumstances, and the "sanctity" of hetero marriage (despite it's enormous failure rate). But politically/strategically, embracing those social positions has been and continues to be an anchor around your party's neck.

a person's seniority in the Senate doesn't some how make them gospel speakers.

He's hardly the only republican to have expressed respect for Garland.

And Garland isn't reasonable at all

Well, again, according to Hatch he was a "fine man" - with more federal judicial experience than any supreme court nominee in our nation's history - a man who would be a "consensus nominee" - who would "no question" win bi-partisan confirmation if appointed. That is until Obama actually nominated him......then suddenly he wasn't even worthy of a hearing.
Break out the Pampers and pacifiers for the republican senate.
 
I'm not going to take the time to break them down one by one, in main because you wouldn't agree with my objections to them anyway, nor will anything I might point out alter your thinking.
I guess they're just peachy if you believe, among other things, in no abortions under any circumstances, and the "sanctity" of hetero marriage (despite it's enormous failure rate). But politically/strategically, embracing those social positions has been and continues to be an anchor around your party's neck.

a person's seniority in the Senate doesn't some how make them gospel speakers.

He's hardly the only republican to have expressed respect for Garland.

And Garland isn't reasonable at all

Well, again, according to Hatch he was a "fine man" - with more federal judicial experience than any supreme court nominee in our nation's history - a man who would be a "consensus nominee" - who would "no question" win bi-partisan confirmation if appointed. That is until Obama actually nominated him......then suddenly he wasn't even worthy of a hearing.
Break out the Pampers and pacifiers for the republican senate.


You know very well if Obum nominated anyone there was going to be an ulterior motive for it, let's get real here. One of the main issues in the nation right now is the 2A, and Garland is a gun hater for sure.


There are others who point out he is no "moderate" whatsoever. Want proof? Take your pick: https://www.google.com/#q=merrick+garland+is+no+moderate
 

Mayhem

Banned
You know very well if Obum nominated anyone there was going to be an ulterior motive for it, let's get real here. One of the main issues in the nation right now is the 2A, and Garland is a gun hater for sure.


There are others who point out he is no "moderate" whatsoever. Want proof? Take your pick: https://www.google.com/#q=merrick+garland+is+no+moderate

If Obama "nominated anyone" it's because he's President and the Supreme Court needs a vacancy filled.

Your pretzel logic above encapsulates the very real reason why there's no need for you to post anything. Regardless of topic, when you feel the need to reply, just type a . and hit "Post", because in every instance we know exactly what you're going to say anyway. If Obama said or did it, it's bad. Doesn't matter what, it's Obama and it's bad and he's a communist. Yes, we get it. No need to exert yourself any more. Just put your avatar where we can see it and we know exactly what you said in that post.

You're the Ron Popeil of political porn board commentators. Set it and forget it.
 
If Obama "nominated anyone" it's because he's President and the Supreme Court needs a vacancy filled.

Your pretzel logic above encapsulates the very real reason why there's no need for you to post anything. Regardless of topic, when you feel the need to reply, just type a . and hit "Post", because in every instance we know exactly what you're going to say anyway. If Obama said or did it, it's bad. Doesn't matter what, it's Obama and it's bad and he's a communist. Yes, we get it. No need to exert yourself any more. Just put your avatar where we can see it and we know exactly what you said in that post.

You're the Ron Popeil of political porn board commentators. Set it and forget it.


Oh FFS...as if every leftist dingleberry isn't the EXACT SAME WAY...so fuck off, with all due respect.


Liberals, always the self-righteous, condescending, arrogant little arseholes, to the end of time. Always know what's best for everyone. Two can play that game, so don't sit there and act like you (and your ilk) are above such stances/standards.


You guys just play around so much like the children you are, it's hard not to let your child's play, bullshit/lies and temper tantrums get to the point were you have to lash out. Nothing but lies and propaganda comes out of a (very left, at least, not necessarily all left-wingers) mouths/fingertips.
 
Top