*2016 US Presidential Elections* - Candidates, Statistics, Campaign Timelines, Debates

Ace Boobtoucher

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
http://100percentfedup.com/breaking...-yr-old-could-end-it-all-for-crooked-hillary/
 
Jack Davenport

Jack Davenport

Banned
sean miguel

sean miguel

26 flights on the ****** Express with video of Bill Clinton ****** a 13-year-old on the plane and on the island.

A former president. And a potential occupant in the white house again.

fuck the democrats. they are evil pieces of ****. The both of these should be in prison.
 
sean miguel

sean miguel

Trump was also a frequent flyer on the ****** Express and there's a federal lawsuit filed against him in the case of the **** of a 13-year-old.

So there's probably a video of that somewhere as well. So either way, we're going to have an accused ***** ****** in the White House.


Go America. Russia and China are laughing their asses off.
 
Straight Shooter

Straight Shooter

animus fox said:
Trump was also a frequent flyer on the ****** Express and there's a federal lawsuit filed against him in the case of the **** of a 13-year-old.

So there's probably a video of that somewhere as well. So either way, we're going to have an accused ***** ****** in the White House.


Go America. Russia and China are laughing their asses off.
Click to expand...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-started-cover-affair-Arkansas-governor.html
 
Straight Shooter

Straight Shooter

Jack Davenport

Jack Davenport

Banned
As Limbaugh said today. Up until 2 weeks before an election, polls are used strictly to form public opinion .

They will tighten 10-14 days out and Trump may even lead but it will be close.

There are dynamics in this election that can't be measured through polling. Turn out is one.

I am predicting Trump wins with 290 electoral votes.
 
meesterperfect

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
I'm sorry to haveto say this but anybody who believes MSM polls is a fucking idiot.
That's not directed at anybody particular.
With all the information we have access to today and with the blatant propaganda machine the msm has become, if you get your information from them especially regarding poll numbers you might want to get to a doctor asap.
It's the equivalent of treating dandruff with a guillotine.
One thing I do hope will happen however is when Trump becomes PREZ he will repeal the "you must spread some reputation before giving it to ....." rule.
It always seemed like a form of affirmative action to me.
 
tvstrip

tvstrip

Just BC said:
Bill Clinton's history of assault has been documented and he has even settled some of them monetarily.
Trump's are allegations. He's a billionaire that surely would have been sued within the past 3 decades instead of 3 weeks before an election.
Even Bill Cosby had accusers that sought to have him charged a decade or so ago and just didn't suddenly appear with their claims.
Click to expand...
As a lawyer this must really be concerning. Why do we instantly give credence to these women who happen to come forward at such a convenient time?
They know the court of public opinion will support them. They know all the talk/news shows will pay big $ to get them on their shows. I'm willing to bet that most, if not all of them will NOT file charge with the police. Yes, there is a statute of limitations for sexual assault, but for over half of the US states there is NO limit. (BC, correct me if I'm wrong)

But will they file with the police? No, they'll be happy with the adulation & $ they'll have swindled, along with some nice gifts from the clintons; no need to risk all that. It won't matter that their case was never proved. It's like that Gomeshi trial in Canada this year; a bunch of women piled on accusing this guy of SA, but most didn't get to trial, and of the 3 that did, their credibility was torn to shreds.

I hope that if trump doesn't win, he goes after each one of them with a defamation suit. In fact, he'll need to in order to clear his name.
 
bodie54

bodie54

tvstrip said:
As a lawyer this must really be concerning. Why do we instantly give credence to these women who happen to come forward at such a convenient time?
Click to expand...

Why do we give credence to someone like Kathleen Willey at all?

According to Linda Tripp's grand jury testimony, she felt Willey pursued a romance with Clinton from the start of her White House affiliation. Willey had speculated with Tripp as to how she might be able to set up an assignation between herself and the president. She routinely attended events at which Clinton would be present, wearing a black dress she believed he liked. According to Tripp's testimony, Willey wondered if she and Clinton could arrange to meet in a home to which she had access, on the Chesapeake Bay.

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not. On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.

from wiki
 
xfire

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
tvstrip said:
I hope that if trump doesn't win, he goes after each one of them with a defamation suit. In fact, he'll need to in order to clear his name.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I want to see that happen. Play the "grab them by the pussy" tape in court. Trump doesn't have a character to defame, he's libel-proof.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Johan
Climate change : Good and bad news
Replies
10
Views
3K
Luxman
Luxman
Johan
Hillary's official presidential bid announcement
2 3
Replies
58
Views
12K
Straight Shooter
Straight Shooter
Johan
Marco Rubio goes for President
Replies
17
Views
2K
MMMariah
M
sean miguel
Camille Paglia: Who the hell is this woman??
Replies
13
Views
3K
Rey C.
Rey C.
Johan
Demographics are changing in the US, unlike GOP tactics
2
Replies
20
Views
4K
darthtexan
darthtexan
Top