The Official 2008/2009 NCAA Football Thread

[LUVbigboobs]

Alabama is not worried about him they just use him as all talk. Yes, he could make a big play as could anyone. But I don't see it happening. If I didn't even watch football I could tell you that. Because I wouldn't laugh in your face about it if I thought I had the upper hand. Because I know what I'm talking about. Go ahead and watch the game see what happens.

You DON'T know what you're talking about (about ANYTHING) and furthermore, your grammar SUCKS. Are you homeschooled, or something? You better hope so 'cause at least then you'd have SOME kind of excuse for your ABSOLUTELY NONSENSICAL posts. I mean, you post stuff that makes it look like you're from another planet, or perhaps even from another galaxy, or something. You're hopeless. You're also going to be ignored from now on, at least by me. I hope others follow suit because your attempts at reason are enough to confuse a member of MENSA and therefore really aren't worth anybody else's time, troll.

 

[LUVbigboobs]

It just proves you have taken advantage of your counter and many people may not know about it. But I haven't forgot, that may not make much sense but It make's enough sense to say that I know what I'm talking about.

EXHIBIT A on how nonsensical this boob's posts are. Does anybody else actually take the time to read anything this moron puts out? Man, I really DO have too much time on my hands right now!

 

[assholebythedoor]

that's because your not worth the big piece of **** you crap out every morning. How can you say I don't make sense I'm not trying to judge the football game. But Alabama will win. They are a better team. Whatever you say man, thanks for looking out for me.

 

[assholebythedoor]

EXHIBIT A on how nonsensical this boob's posts are. Does anybody else actually take the time to read anything this moron puts out? Man, I really DO have too much time on my hands right now!

You don't even know when enough is enough. Get off my back, I didn't say anything to offend you. So what, I made a mistake get over it. You should be able to tell the difference. As you boast so much about it. But then again everybody might be as full of **** as you are.

 

[Jagger69]

Yesterday they interviewed some NCAA coach--I can't remember who it was--and he said that we already have head-to-head competition within conferences as it is. He can't see how a playoff system would be any different.

I bet it wasn't Mack Brown!

I'm not going to pitch a fit about how Texas got robbed by this ridiculous BCS nonsense but the Longhorns already beat Oklahoma so how can head-to-head mean a whole lot in the final analysis (at least in the Big 12)?

Why aren't all conference rules standardized? Why can't we have a playoff system?

I guess we'll never get the answers we want and need for a fair system to be established. Fuck this beauty contest. When will things be settled where they deserve to be settled....the goddamned field???

BCS? BULLSHIT CRAPPY SYSTEM

That said, congrats to the Sooners.....they "won" the Big 12 South. Sorry if you don't mind that I'll be hoping (seriously) for a Missouri ambush against a very talented and hopefully overconfident team next Saturday. It's just a shame that I have to.

 

[Jason z]

Do you think Percy Harvin will play in the SEC champion game.

Yea, he should be back. Just an ankle sprain. Damn it's like everytime we got him 100% he get's injured. Fuck FSU!! They try to injure are players every year. Their fans starting celebrating when he got injured. That's why Tebow got pissed and took over. For all those who say we can't play physical, We showed everybody Saturday. Bring on Bama.... GO GATORS!

 

[LUVbigboobs]

I bet it wasn't Mack Brown!

I'm not going to pitch a fit about how Texas got robbed by this ridiculous BCS nonsense but the Longhorns already beat Oklahoma so how can head-to-head mean a whole lot in the final analysis (at least in the Big 12)?

Why aren't all conference rules standardized? Why can't we have a playoff system?

I guess we'll never get the answers we want and need for a fair system to be established. Fuck this beauty contest. When will things be settled where they deserve to be settled....the goddamned field???

BCS? BULLSHIT CRAPPY SYSTEM

That said, congrats to the Sooners.....they "won" the Big 12 South. Sorry if you don't mind that I'll be hoping (seriously) for a Missouri ambush against a very talented and hopefully overconfident team next Saturday. It's just a shame that I have to.

You may just get it. On Saturday Rece Davis of ESPN stated that since the inception of the Big XII, Big XII football teams that have been ranked in the top 3, nationally (although I'm not sure if he was referring to AP ranking, coaches' ranking, or BCS standings) going into the Big XII championship game are only 5 - 5 in that game. There's also the matter of Oklahoma having beaten Mizzou in last year's Big XII championship game which might favor the Tigers in some psychological sense. Who knows? On paper the Tigers don't appear to have much of a chance, but that didn't stop Texas from upsetting Nebraska in (I believe it was) 1996 or Kansas State from upsetting Oklahoma in 2003 (or whatever year that was that they upset the previously unbeaten and seemingly invincible Sooners)!!

 

[Skyraider22]

Well guys Champion Saturday is set we all know the big game ,but what do you guys have to say about the MAC champion and the C-USA champion. I have Tulsa in the C-USA and Ball Statein the MAC,but Buffalo is a good team at 7-5,but not trhat good what do you guys thinks.

 

[E-Ann-Hilden]

I am hoping for a Ball State vs Boise State match up. There is some dealing going on there. I see Ball State beating Buffalo, a good team that has played well this year, but not at the level as Boise State, at least in the ESPN reports. Ball beating WMU was impressive.

 

[maildude]

You may just get it. On Saturday Rece Davis of ESPN stated that since the inception of the Big XII, Big XII football teams that have been ranked in the top 3, nationally (although I'm not sure if he was referring to AP ranking, coaches' ranking, or BCS standings) going into the Big XII championship game are only 5 - 5 in that game. There's also the matter of Oklahoma having beaten Mizzou in last year's Big XII championship game which might favor the Tigers in some psychological sense. Who knows? On paper the Tigers don't appear to have much of a chance, but that didn't stop Texas from upsetting Nebraska in (I believe it was) 1996 or Kansas State from upsetting Oklahoma in 2003 (or whatever year that was that they upset the previously unbeaten and seemingly invincible Sooners)!!

A lot of teams laid down points on the Sooners this year. Even the Bearcats put up 26. The problem is outscoring them. Texas and TCU gave up the least number of points to OK with 35 in each case. Go ahead and look at the Frogs' schedule--I know, I know...it ain't as tough as OK's. But TCU only gave up an average of 10 points a game. Tough defensive team. Cross over to Missouri. Similar scoring margins on wins as Texas or OK. But on points given up, not so impressive overall. They squeezed by Baylor, and then not too much later were beaten by Kansas. OK has the momentum, The Tigers do not.

 

[LUVbigboobs]

Ohio State has talent. Ohio State has coaching. But they played like **** when it mattered and don't deserve the BCS this year. Florida had a crappy year last year and got punked by Meat in the Capital One bowl right? I think they turned it around this year. Ohio State will be back next season, nobody doubts that. But to put them in the BCS this year, when they've done nothing trashes the sanctity of the BCS process, imo.

USC better destroy ucla next week....

I find your criticism of the Buckeyes interesting. As I recall, the Oklahoma Sooners lost in both the 2004 and 2005 national championship games (in the 2005 one by 36 points to USC in a game that wasn't even that "close") and they haven't actually won a bowl game in several years, and yet I don't see you criticizing the Oklahoma Sooner football team. Why not? Is it because you have some kind of vendetta against the Ohio State Buckeyes, or because you're an Oklahoma Sooner football fan, or what?

 

[Jagger69]

OK has the momentum, The Tigers do not.

Momentum is overrated. Just ask the Longhorns after they beat Oklahoma, Missouri and Oklahoma State in consecutive weeks. Can Missouri win? Hell yes they can....it's college football for God's sake!!

 

[Jagger69]

Well guys Champion Saturday is set we all know the big game ,but what do you guys have to say about the MAC champion and the C-USA champion. I have Tulsa in the C-USA and Ball Statein the MAC,but Buffalo is a good team at 7-5,but not trhat good what do you guys thinks.

Don't discount Rice. Owls have been really coming on of late and dismantled a Houston team last week that scored over 70 on Tulsa.

 

[Skyraider22]

That is a good point Rice is a good team and can score a lot of points it should be a great game hopefully a shoot out.

 

[Baill Inneraora]

I find your criticism of the Buckeyes interesting. As I recall, the Oklahoma Sooners lost in both the 2004 and 2005 national championship games (in the 2005 one by 36 points to USC in a game that wasn't even that "close") and they haven't actually won a bowl game in several years, and yet I don't see you criticizing the Oklahoma Sooner football team. Why not? Is it because you have some kind of vendetta against the Ohio State Buckeyes, or because you're an Oklahoma Sooner football fan, or what?

Since the start of the BCS, Ohio State is 4-2. Oklahoma is 2-4 with impressive losses against Boise State and West Virgina.

 

[maildude]

Don't discount Rice. Owls have been really coming on of late and dismantled a Houston team last week that scored over 70 on Tulsa.

...and Tulsa scored 63 on them. In all but four cases the Owls have given up at least 31 points to their opponents. Still, I have to give Bailiff credit: he followed up what he did at Texas State pretty well here. Graham must have wanted that game badly enough to spur on his team to beat his replacement! Not surprising, since there is no love lost between Graham and Rice U.

 

[LUVbigboobs]

You know all the hype surrounding the guys who are in contention for the Heisman trophy this year (and even surrounding a couple who aren't). I was wondering which of those guys you think the pros are the most interested in? I was thinking of Sam Bradford, Colt McCoy (I know he's planning on submitting paperwork to find out what his NFL stock is after this season), Graham Harrell, Michael Crabtree, Zac Robinson (Oklahoma State quarterback), Tim Tebow, and Percy Harvin. Right now I thinking that Michael Crabtree might actually be the guy that the pros are salivating over most right now, of the players I listed. What do you think?

 

[Jagger69]

^
Oh I agree without question that Crabtree would be the most coveted one of all of them. The QBs you mentioned are all pro prospects....just not sure how high they would go. If McCoy comes out, I say he is a 2nd or 3rd rounder right now. As senior, he should go higher (especially if he adds to his outstanding performance this year). Bradford may be the best of them all. Harrell? Hard to judge him....QBs from Tech historically haven't done well in the NFL. Will Tebow's ability translate to the NFL? Hard to say. Robinson is a solid passer who should also be a good prospect for the pros.

I say whichever QB wins the National Title game will likely get the Heisman if it includes either Oklahoma, Florida or Texas. If not, it's up for grabs.

 

[Jagger69]

...and Tulsa scored 63 on them. In all but four cases the Owls have given up at least 31 points to their opponents. Still, I have to give Bailiff credit: he followed up what he did at Texas State pretty well here. Graham must have wanted that game badly enough to spur on his team to beat his replacement! Not surprising, since there is no love lost between Graham and Rice U.

Yes well that's life in C-USA. Lots of explosive offenses for sure. Should make for an interesting rematch when they hook up again.

 

[titsrock]

I find your criticism of the Buckeyes interesting. As I recall, the Oklahoma Sooners lost in both the 2004 and 2005 national championship games (in the 2005 one by 36 points to USC in a game that wasn't even that "close") and they haven't actually won a bowl game in several years, and yet I don't see you criticizing the Oklahoma Sooner football team. Why not? Is it because you have some kind of vendetta against the Ohio State Buckeyes, or because you're an Oklahoma Sooner football fan, or what?

My criticism is on point. I have nothing against Ohio State or Oklahoma. If I had to live in Buckeyeville or Okieland I would pick Buckeyeville.

My main criticism with Ohio State football is that for all the talent it has, they play a very boring game. They pound the ball and throw it around (when they have to). I'd prefer to see some creativity out of them. They did go with 4WR sets when they had Gonzalez and other WRs in recent times, but this year it was hand the ball off to Beanie and play Defense. Part of that reason is because Terrell Pryor is still a freshman who can't throw the ball at the Div1 level yet. He will improve in time. I'm patient enough, as a general CFB fan, to wait around for him to develop.

Okie is a creative offense. They go with the no huddle and they have a spread the ball ******. I don't think they have the Defense to win the National Championship this year. ALthough, they might be able to simply outscore their opponents now. They are an interesting team right now.

I believe Florida is the best all-around team right now. I think USC is second. USC's offense is "fragile" imo. Yes they put up 30+ on Notre Dame but it was a sloppy performance offensively. Their D is so dominating that it can cover up mistakes on offense which Okie, Florida, Bama, Texas don't make.

Ohio State didn't do enough this year to warrant a place in the BCS. USC graduates 7 and might lose 9 Defensive players to the NFL. They will be a 10 point underdog in the Shoe next season and Ohio State will be able to get revenge and make a big early statement in 09.