Why White Girls Like Black Dick! (vid)

[Bloodshot Scott]

PFFT!!! :1orglaugh Let me educate you my child...

You say that there IS NOT a difference between pornstars and prostitutes. I agree with that, as they are both paid money to perform acts of a sexual nature.

Yet, you say that there IS a difference between pornstars and centerfolds, even though they are both paid money to perform acts of a sexual nature.

:dunno:

Just because you are a prostitute, doesn't mean that you are going to be fucking somebody every single time you are paid. Your client might be paying you to perform a strip tease, for example, which isn't having sex, but you are a still a prostitute. The same works for pornstars. If you were a pornstar, your client might be paying you to perform a strip tease or even take naked photographs, which is exactly what centerfolds do. Just because centerfolds are called "centerfolds" instead of "pornstars" or "prostitutes", doesn't mean that they are completely different careers.

They all get paid money to perform acts of a sexual nature.

youre playing yourself.

what are you more inclined to have sex with: a woman that has had sex with a thousand guys or a woman who took her clothes off in front of a camera a thousand times? who is more likely to have an STD? the one who fucked a thousand guys is approximately 1000 times more likely to have a STD. you dont have to graduate from high school to know that.

This is the most ignorant thread in the history of the internet.

opine

 

[ChefChiTown]

youre playing yourself.

what are you more inclined to have sex with: a woman that has had sex with a thousand guys or a woman who took her clothes off in front of a camera a thousand times? who is more likely to have an STD? the one who fucked a thousand guys is approximately 1000 times more likely to have a STD. you dont have to graduate from high school to know that.

How am I playing myself?

And, what exactly is your argument with pornstars vs. centerfolds? I swear, you've changed angles 4 or 5 times already.

Plus, how do you know that centerfolds don't fuck just as many guys as pornstars do? Just because it's not on camera and sold on DVD, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen behind closed doors. In your own words, "you don't have to graduate from high school to know that."

Honestly, if a girl is open enough with her body and her sexuality to willingly make a career choice involving nude photographs that are seen by the world, I'm willing to bet that she has a lot of sex too, so...once again, what's your point?

:dunno:

I'm still not sure what your exact argument is here. So, if you can, go ahead and make it perfectly clear for me.

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

How am I playing myself?

And, what exactly is your argument with pornstars vs. centerfolds? I swear, you've changed angles 4 or 5 times already.

Plus, how do you know that centerfolds don't fuck just as many guys as pornstars do? Just because it's not on camera and sold on DVD, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen behind closed doors. In your own words, "you don't have to graduate from high school to know that."

Honestly, if a girl is open enough with her body and her sexuality to willingly make a career choice involving nude photographs that are seen by the world, I'm willing to bet that she has a lot of sex too, so...once again, what's your point?

:dunno:

I'm still not sure what your exact argument is here. So, if you can, go ahead and make it perfectly clear for me.

I guess it was a side argument that digressed way off topic, I think.

 

[Evil]

...just turn on your tube and view the commercials; ever wonder why it is so many times a dorky white dude in the commercial or how so many times its a black male standing next to a white female? its subliminal in nature. sneaky systematic stunts to try and wrestle everything from the evil white man. i dont have to sit here and argue this, just look at this forum. its so evident on so many levels.

You're the reason alexis texas won't do IR aren't you?

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

You're the reason Alexis Texas won't do IR aren't you?

edit

 

[ryan23]

nope. i quoted Spike Lee (his coined term). i guess maybe he's the racist.


i'm not doing a very good job of laying my case. for people here to say that people that have sex (on tape) for money arent a little different, i think you guys are a little off your rocker. just go out and ask a really classy female what she thinks about porn and i would be willing to bet that 90%+ of the time they would say its trashy. (just my opinion.)


Portuguese women are white, dude. Portugal=Europe. Europe=white people.



where are statistics to back this rubbish up? whoever said black men treat women better than white men? are you fucking kidding me? how many Africa America children are born out of wedlock: 70%+. so I hardly see how bailing on a child is remotely treating females better than men that actually are active in a relationship.

LOOL offcourse they are white what i mean is they are tanned not pasty white like scottish people

 

[ryan23]

This is the most ignorant thread in the history of the internet.

Theres worse my friend but its pretty bad isnt it- probably the thread starter is the kind of person that is trying to track down Obama and shoot him

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

LOOL offcourse they are white what i mean is they are tanned not pasty white like scottish people

some of them are pasty white. not saying that you are, but there is a lot of ignorance in the world when it comes to white/european culture. i've heard people say that Spaniards and Italians arent white, but that is false.

Theres worse my friend but its pretty bad isnt it- probably the thread starter is the kind of person that is trying to track down Obama and shoot him

the thread starter is the moderater.

 

[ChefChiTown]

Theres worse my friend but its pretty bad isnt it- probably the thread starter is the kind of person that is trying to track down Obama and shoot him

It's actually Freeones, an administrator, who started the thread. And, if you would bother to look at the original post, you would see the expression of "BS" next to the link, indicating that they aren't agreeing with what the video says.

Video

Potential Obama assassin? I think not.

 

[Evil]

some of them are pasty white. not saying that you are, but there is a lot of ignorance in the world when it comes to white/european culture. i've heard people say that Spaniards and Italians arent white, but that is false.

Race is a social construct and a recent one at that. Spain was conquered by the moors who were arabs, etc. I don't know the story with southern Italy but there's a nice variety of looks going on there, and well it is in the mediterranean after all.

As far as being white? They think they are and no one challenges that so sure what the hell, they're white.

 

[bodie54]

My oh my what a thread. What is this, national bigot's month or something?

As far as the hardcore/softcore debate goes I have to disagree with you, Chef. While they are both components of the "sex industry" the jump to hardcore is a MAJOR psychic leap that crosses a definitive and often life-altering line. All the women I've known in the industry would agree with that statement, and when you compare these two pictures (as examples) I don't see how you can disagree :dunno:

http://www.a-tribute-to.com/years/2008/09_valerie_mason/hires/c04.jpg

http://www.hardsexorgies.com/freaksofcock/gal20081107/docs/04.jpg

 

[Will E Worm]

the jump to hardcore is a MAJOR psychic leap that crosses a definitive and often life-altering line.

http://www.hardsexorgies.com/freaksofcock/gal20081107/docs/04.jpg

It's not like they are virgins. So, they can only tease so long before people will be bored.

Your link is from Freaks of Cock. That site is fake. :tongue:

 

[bodie54]

I disagree. I've been a softcore fan my whole adult life and have never gotten bored with it.

I know it's a fake cock/pop shot, but still feel it serves the purpose.
But if you want real ones, that's fine. No lack of those around...

http://www.fresh-porn-links.com/gggirls/sperma_wg_pics/nastyrat.html

 

[Will E Worm]

I disagree. I've been a softcore fan my whole adult life and have never gotten bored with it.

I just feel they could be doing more and they are teasing and picking people's pockets.

Unless they are swimsuit or sears catalog models.

They could always just pose for the children's magazine, know as Playboy.
Then vanish.

:tongue:

 

[bodie54]

Teasing, how? By not fucking on film? Well like I said, that's a HUGE leap. And clearly even that's not good enough for a lot of (what I consider to be jaded) modern porn consumers who think porn stars that don't do anal are just teases At some point when that becomes passe, which it will, what'll be the next gold standard for "edgy"? Honestly, if I ever got to the point where I found solo nude centerfolds boring I'd be real concerned about the level of desensitization my porn consumption had created.

 

[Evil]

I just feel they could be doing more and they are teasing and picking people's pockets.

Unless they are swimsuit or sears catalog models.

They could always just pose for the children's magazine, know as Playboy.
Then vanish.

:tongue:

It's only teasing if all you want is the money shot, some people like that stuff.
Some only like softcore others hard (sometimes jumping straight to penetration) and some like a bit of both.

 

[Will E Worm]

Teasing, how? By not fucking on film? Well like I said, that's a HUGE leap.

Like I said before, they are not virgins. So, I do not see the "big leap" theory.
They can jump from guy to guy off film, they can do it on film.

It's only teasing if all you want is the money shot, some people like that stuff.
Some only like softcore others hard (sometimes jumping straight to penetration) and some like a bit of both.

It is teasing. Look at girls like Karla Spice. She said something like, "I'm going to spice things up on my site". She took her top off.

Then on sites like hers they make you pay and have want lists. So, their fans can buy them things.

You know the guys and some girls are waiting for their first hardcore scene.

 

[bodie54]

Like I said before, they are not virgins. So, I do not see the "big leap" theory. They can jump from guy to guy off film, they can do it on film.

Number of partners is not at issue here.
Privacy and the consequences of surrendering it are.
Whatever they do in their private life remains private.
Once they have sex on film obviously it's available for all and sundry to view at their leisure essentially forever.
HUGE difference.

It is teasing.

Apparently lots of guys like non-nude teaser stuff because some of those women have been very successful.

You know the guys and some girls are waiting for their first hardcore scene.

If they're paying site fees specifically in hopes that will happen then they're suckers and deserve to be fleeced. The common sense thing to do would be to wait until one hears it's happened (if it ever does), then subscribe to their site :dunno:

 

[Will E Worm]

Number of partners is not at issue here.
Privacy and the consequences of surrendering it are.
Whatever they do in their private life remains private.

Unless, a tape is leaked.

I still believe if they can take their clothing off and have sex off camera with multiple partners, they can do more.
Especially if they have their own site.

We can just agree to disagree.

If they're paying site fees specifically in hopes that will happen then they're suckers and deserve to be fleeced. The common sense thing to do would be to wait until one hears it's happened (if it ever does), then subscribe to their site :dunno:

They should wait. I wouldn't subscribe to a site with just one girl on it.
I might be able to make an exception for, Franziska Facella, depending on what she does.

 

[ChefChiTown]

As far as the hardcore/softcore debate goes I have to disagree with you, Chef. While they are both components of the "sex industry" the jump to hardcore is a MAJOR psychic leap that crosses a definitive and often life-altering line. All the women I've known in the industry would agree with that statement, and when you compare these two pictures (as examples) I don't see how you can disagree :dunno:

http://www.a-tribute-to.com/years/2008/09_valerie_mason/hires/c04.jpg

http://www.hardsexorgies.com/freaksofcock/gal20081107/docs/04.jpg

What does the psychology behind this have to do with anything? The point I was making was very simple...

Women who take their clothes off for money and pose for pictures are sluts.
Women who have sex with other people for money are sluts.
They are both sluts.

Sure, you can dissect it all you want, but a slut is a slut.

Obviously, this is all a matter of opinion, as we all have different ideas as to what is and what isn't slutty, so nobody is right and nobody is wrong here. It all depends on "where we draw the line" with what we deem to be slutty. Personally, I don't try and seperate the "levels" of slutiness just to make some acts of slutiness seem "better" than others. I know where my hypothetical line is drawn and anything beyond that is slutty, all in the same. For example, some people think that if a girl "only" sucks dick but doesn't have sex with the 100 guys that she's hooked up with, that it's "less slutty" than if she had sex with those 100 guys. Me? I don't think it's "less slutty" at all. Why? Because, a slut is a slut.

:2 cents: