He won for reasons which could be debated ad infinitum.
Did he win? He was in no debate. The other contenders winnowed themselves down until he was announced, and they went along with it.
He won for reasons which could be debated ad infinitum.
Biden was in plenty of debates. [I must be missing something since you typically make sense. ]Did he win? He was in no debate. The other contenders winnowed themselves down until he was announced, and they went along with it.
He and Bernie participated in all of them. His 'hiding' in plain sight is part of the issue.I honestly don't recall him being on-stage with other contenders. Admittedly, I didn't follow as the candidate numbers decreased.
Did he win? He was in no debate. The other contenders winnowed themselves down until he was announced, and they went along with it.
It never works, at the national level - running a campaign that's solely "I'm not that guy, at least!" Have to come with more.
Er, he already has. He's released detailed plans on everything from taxation to coronavirus to education to healthcare. He's already established his own state department of over 2000 people who are serious diplomats and experts in their areas.
I'm sure we'll see it in the debates. All these trumpa loompas that are expecting trump to shred Biden should remember that 8 years ago Biden held up pretty well against paul ryan in the VP debates. I don't think he has much to worry about against this drooling idiot.
Why lower yourself? I mean, I'm sure that you don't approve of the Trump campaign's inference that Joe Biden is in the early stages of Alzheimers, based on his unusual and combative behavior, and his being "kept out of sight".
When I first glanced and saw that your post contained "drooling idiot", I thought that's where you were headed, highlighting Trump's ugly, unsubstantiated attacks on Biden, and Biden's possible infirmity. But no. That's just what you call the President. 😄 It takes more than attacks to win at the national level, too. 😄
The only Biden policy position that the American people have heard about from Joe Biden in recent weeks is his agreement with calls to defund police.
That 2000 person State Department - where's he hiding that?! 🤣
That's something he ought to do, perhaps, because you're right: he ought to make his case that he's got "binders full" (😄) of fixers, on speed dial.Biden does have a leg up as a candidate being in government for his career that he knows or had people who knows what needs to get done and who can do it. The Trump drama of trying to fill positions was a mess. Some of it was Democrats making it as tough as possible, but you have to expect it. Most of it was that they were learning as they went and the only way to learn is to make mistakes and we saw the trail of people that were mistakes from this administrations. lol
That 2000 person State Department - where's he hiding that?! 🤣
A "team of informal advisors" does not a State Department make 😉Inside the Massive Foreign-Policy Team Advising Biden’s Campaign
Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden’s team of informal foreign-policy and national security advisors has expanded to over 2,000 people, including 20 working groups spanning issues from diversity in national security to arms control, defense, intelligence, and homeland security, according to campaign officials and an internal list of the co-chairs of those groups obtained by Foreign Policy.
I won't bother addressing "Biden's possibly infirmity," as it's a baseless right wing fantasy.
A "team of informal advisors" does not a State Department make 😉
I settled on "sugar tits", thank you Mel Gibson 😄I feel "advisors" is window-dressing for "lobbyist."
It's like creating different names for "sugar."
I feel "advisors" is window-dressing for "lobbyist."
It's maybe superfluous.That's a really stupid thing to say. The president's whole job is to listen to advisers and make decisions based on the best available advice. Only a true moron would think they know everything and can run the presidency without advisers.