Who ****** JFK?

After reading copious amounts of books and material on the subject over the years, as well as analyzing the evidence, I sincerely believe LHO acted alone.
 
Oliver Stone
 
After reading copious amounts of books and material on the subject over the years, as well as analyzing the evidence, I sincerely believe LHO acted alone.

Are you the great grandson of Chief Justice Earl Warren?
 
[will.e.worm & Sam Fisher & meesterperfect]
It was Obama !
[/will.e.worm & Sam Fisher & meesterperfect]
 
Oswalds connection may never truly be known.

I believe the CIA, some very high echelon military personnel, and everyone who served on the Warren Commission were all in on it. And, Oswald was simply a stooge who didn't know he was being set up.

Read the Warren Commission Report and find out for yourselves how ridiculous it is.

Premium Link Upgrade
 
No credible evidence has surfaced in 50 years that points to anyone else or is convincing enough to tie Oswald to a conspiracy.

I wanted to believe in a conspiracy for years. It's a sexier story. But the evidence keeps pulling me back to Oswald...and Oswald alone. When you really read up on Jim Garrison, Jim Marrs and "characters" like David Ferrie, the stories become too fanciful. I tend to agree with Bugliosi, if this were a regular ******, not involving the President, it would be about a 3-4 day trial. Fingerprints on the *** (and boxes in sniper nest), bullets traced to the ***, Oswald purchased *** under his pseudonym, qualified for sharpshooter in the Marines, photos of him taken by Marina holding the ***, previous assassination attempt on Walker, only employee not present at SBD after shooting, ******* JD Tippit, attempting to **** arresting officer in movie theater, etc. etc..... it's just too much.

And if anyone wants to talk "back and to the left," I'm more than willing to explain basic physics and subsequent ballistic tests.
 
No credible evidence has surfaced in 50 years that points to anyone else or is convincing enough to tie Oswald to a conspiracy.

I wanted to believe in a conspiracy for years. It's a sexier story. But the evidence keeps pulling me back to Oswald...and Oswald alone. When you really read up on Jim Garrison, Jim Marrs and "characters" like David Ferrie, the stories become too fanciful. I tend to agree with Bugliosi, if this were a regular ******, not involving the President, it would be about a 3-4 day trial. Fingerprints on the *** (and boxes in sniper nest), bullets traced to the ***, Oswald purchased *** under his pseudonym, qualified for sharpshooter in the Marines, photos of him taken by Marina holding the ***, previous assassination attempt on Walker, only employee not present at SBD after shooting, ******* JD Tippit, attempting to **** arresting officer in movie theater, etc. etc..... it's just too much.

And if anyone wants to talk "back and to the left," I'm more than willing to explain basic physics and subsequent ballistic tests.

I'll talk about it....

 
I think it's safe to say Lee Harvey Oswald was merely used as a patsy for JFK's assassination

To back up my statement, I'd like to point out that Lee Harvey Oswald was ****** before even being put on trial for JFK's assassination (which is clearly a ********* of the "innocent until proven guilty" principle)
 
So is any ******...geez, did you have to think about that post a lot?

Who and what are you referring to? If it's in reference to my statement about the length of the trial, it was used to showcase how complicated and convoluted this case has become (assassination brings out the looney tunes), when in reality it's rather simple and easy to figure out.

If you're a CT, please bring something substantive to the table. Thanks.
 
On Military channel right now "The Mafia Connection" episode of "The Secret War". this gives the background on how the US Govt got involved with Lucky Luciano and the Mafia to fight the fascists in Italy in WW2. Which led to OSS/CIA working with them to fight communists post WW2 in Italy & Cuba. Which led to them working together in ******* JFK.
 
Who and what are you referring to? If it's in reference to my statement about the length of the trial, it was used to showcase how complicated and convoluted this case has become (assassination brings out the looney tunes), when in reality it's rather simple and easy to figure out.

If you're a CT, please bring something substantive to the table. Thanks.

It's so sad you are so slow to get what's really obvious ...
I think it's safe to say Lee Harvey Oswald was merely used as a patsy for JFK's assassination

To back up my statement, I'd like to point out that Lee Harvey Oswald was ****** before even being put on trial for JFK's assassination (which is clearly a ********* of the "innocent until proven guilty" principle)


Originally Posted by Philbert

So is any ******...geez, did you have to think about that post a lot?

:facepalm:

Please bring some higher IQ points to the table, please.
 
I think that in JFK, Oliver Stone makes a good point. I think that it was a conspiracy with various assassins stationed around Dealey Plaza.

Who ****** President Kennedy? That's an easy one. The second shooter coming out of the Grassy Knoll.

 
Back
Top