After reading copious amounts of books and material on the subject over the years, as well as analyzing the evidence, I sincerely believe LHO acted alone.
After reading copious amounts of books and material on the subject over the years, as well as analyzing the evidence, I sincerely believe LHO acted alone.
Oswalds connection may never truly be known.
No credible evidence has surfaced in 50 years that points to anyone else or is convincing enough to tie Oswald to a conspiracy.
I wanted to believe in a conspiracy for years. It's a sexier story. But the evidence keeps pulling me back to Oswald...and Oswald alone. When you really read up on Jim Garrison, Jim Marrs and "characters" like David Ferrie, the stories become too fanciful. I tend to agree with Bugliosi, if this were a regular ******, not involving the President, it would be about a 3-4 day trial. Fingerprints on the *** (and boxes in sniper nest), bullets traced to the ***, Oswald purchased *** under his pseudonym, qualified for sharpshooter in the Marines, photos of him taken by Marina holding the ***, previous assassination attempt on Walker, only employee not present at SBD after shooting, ******* JD Tippit, attempting to **** arresting officer in movie theater, etc. etc..... it's just too much.
And if anyone wants to talk "back and to the left," I'm more than willing to explain basic physics and subsequent ballistic tests.
So is any ******...geez, did you have to think about that post a lot?
Who and what are you referring to? If it's in reference to my statement about the length of the trial, it was used to showcase how complicated and convoluted this case has become (assassination brings out the looney tunes), when in reality it's rather simple and easy to figure out.
If you're a CT, please bring something substantive to the table. Thanks.
I think it's safe to say Lee Harvey Oswald was merely used as a patsy for JFK's assassination
To back up my statement, I'd like to point out that Lee Harvey Oswald was ****** before even being put on trial for JFK's assassination (which is clearly a ********* of the "innocent until proven guilty" principle)
Originally Posted by Philbert
So is any ******...geez, did you have to think about that post a lot?
