Who Is Mark Lloyd?You should probably know.

[meesterperfect]

Mark Lloyd is the associate general counsel and Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission of the USA. He was appointed to the newly created position by United States President Barack Obama on August 4, 2009.
Obamas Diversity czar, shut you up, shut you down,
judge for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNdyAr0q6U0
Who is going to step down so somene else (non white) can have power?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MVt7wFLfuE
Tax and fine them out of business
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP70EdQZKgo
If you don't believe beck(or Lloyds own words).
FCC chairman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw4zpVr3mls

Obama, change. Its good right?

 

[Facetious]

Re: Who Is Mark Lloyd?

Neo black panther in part?


You know what ? FUCK DIVERSITY alright ? Nobody in government has to tell me what race, sex, sex orientation(type), age etc. of people I should or shouldn't intermingle with. If somebody is a snotty asshole, I will treat them as such, conversely, if somebody is good willed, friendly, has a good disposition and character, you know what ?
Welcome to my campsite :hatsoff: :glugglug:


....but please ! Don't be running round with these bureaucratic arbiter weasel (czars) attempting to create some kind of perfect society because that always ends up to be a mountain of skulls in the end.


Judge individuals on the content of their character and retract your attack on First Amendment Rights, Mr Lioyd ! - who I understand praises Hugo Chavez.

 

[Galactic]

Mark Lloyd is the associate general counsel and Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission of the USA. He was appointed to the newly created position by United States President Barack Obama on August 4, 2009.
Obamas Diversity czar, shut you up, shut you down,
judge for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNdyAr0q6U0
Who is going to step down so somene else (non white) can have power?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MVt7wFLfuE
Tax and fine them out of business
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP70EdQZKgo
If you don't believe beck(or Lloyds own words).
FCC chairman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw4zpVr3mls

Obama, change. Its good right?

Neo black panther in part?


You know what ? FUCK DIVERSITY alright ? Nobody in government has to tell me what race, sex, sex orientation(type), age etc. of people I should or shouldn't intermingle with. If somebody is a snotty asshole, I will treat them as such, conversely, if somebody is good willed, friendly, has a good disposition and character, you know what ?
Welcome to my campsite :hatsoff: :glugglug:


....but please ! Don't be running round with these bureaucratic arbiter weasel (czars) attempting to create some kind of perfect society because that always ends up to be a mountain of skulls in the end.


Judge individuals on the content of their character and retract your attack on First Amendment Rights, Mr Lioyd ! - who I understand praises Hugo Chavez.

Well said, both of you guys. Another example of how The Anointed One wants to fundamentally change this country.

 

[Dean Wormer]

Mark Lloyd is the associate general counsel and Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission of the USA. He was appointed to the newly created position by United States President Barack Obama on August 4, 2009.
Obamas Diversity czar, shut you up, shut you down,
judge for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNdyAr0q6U0
Who is going to step down so somene else (non white) can have power?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MVt7wFLfuE
Tax and fine them out of business
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP70EdQZKgo
If you don't believe beck(or Lloyds own words).
FCC chairman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw4zpVr3mls

Obama, change. Its good right?

You're using Glenn Beck as an unbiased source? :rofl:

I might as well believe what Jeremiah Wright says.

 

[Galactic]

You're using Glenn Beck as an unbiased source? :rofl:

I might as well believe what Jeremiah Wright says.

How often do you actually watch Beck, or have you ever?

 

[Facetious]

How often do you actually watch Beck, or have you ever?

Myself, I have listened 3 or 4 times while on the road.

At times, the guy gets into this creepy preachy tone of voice as if he's giving a sermon or some such. :dunno: The guy is different that's for certain.

How did he become so popular ?

 

[Galactic]

Myself, I have listened 3 or 4 times .

The guy gets into this creepy preach tone of voice as if he's giving a sermon at times which certainly makes him stand out in the crowd among the ranks of talk radio.

I've never noticed a preachy tone at all. All I have noticed about the guy is how he is the one with valid questions that the "mainstream" media are not asking. He is the guy pointing out how SEIU, ACORN, and others are linked in a disturbing web that leads all the way back to the Holy Anointed One.

I think the guy is passionate about this country, and the way it was intended to be.....not the shadow of its former self that it is becoming.

Just my :2 cents:

 

[Dean Wormer]

How often do you actually watch Beck, or have you ever?

I used to watch him now and then when he was on Headline News. He was a little wacky then but he made some valid points. Now that he is at Fox News he just goes into histrionics the likes of which I have not seen since a retarded kid in my high school had a spaz attack during lunch in the mid '70's.

 

[Hot Mega]

"Commercial broadcasters want to be trustees of public property but without any responsibility."

What an outlandish thing to say!!

Never mind the fact that it's a true statement in many cases but it's just hilarious to me that the guy who's "offended" by this benign, mostly true statement.....Walden presided over accounting irregularities which resulted in the embezzlement of over $1 million....but he can see offense in that statement...:rofl:

The guy at the end said it best, if you have an organization of 1800 people you can't expect everyone to think in lock step.

Honestly, I can't be all the bluster, hot air and hyperbole Walden contrives to create an issue and be "offended" over that statement (actually I can).

 

[jasonk282]

Remember this is the guy that though Hugo Chaves had a "glourious revolution"

 

[meesterperfect]

You're using Glenn Beck as an unbiased source? :rofl:

I might as well believe what Jeremiah Wright says.

The only source I am using is the mans own words.
Check out another czar, cass sunstien, he's got alot to say also.

 

[Hot Mega]

Remember this is the guy that though Hugo Chaves had a "glourious revolution"

So as long as he's not working for the State Dept. what's the issue?

See, this is how it works.....Believe it or not, at one time in the US the concept of preemptively attacking a sovereign nation was not only considered completely extremist but it went against everything the US stood for principally.

Nonetheless there were extremists who believed in that. Those extremists were put in positions within the previous administration that allowed them to wield the influence and make decisions in the very areas their extremist views applied.

Is it any wonder we ended up preemptively attacking a sovereign nation...ironically enough, the very nation at the center of their preemptive theory?

Point is, you have the right to have your own beliefs....this is America after all. Therefore even though a POTUS or any of his cabinet has the complete right to appoint any qualified person to positions they see fit...it's not wise to appoint people to positions where their views can ill affect public policy.

 

[jasonk282]

So how come Obama would not go on Fox this past Sunday? Is he worried about them asking tough questions instead of asking about his White Sox and their chances of making the playoffs.

 

[jasonk282]

So as long as he's not working for the State Dept. what's the issue?

See, this is how it works.....Believe it or not, at one time in the US the concept of preemptively attacking a sovereign nation was not only considered completely extremist but it went against everything the US stood for principally.

Nonetheless there were extremists who believed in that. Those extremists were put in positions within the previous administration that allowed them to wield the influence and make decisions in the very areas their extremist views applied.

Is it any wonder we ended up preemptively attacking a sovereign nation...ironically enough, the very nation at the center of their preemptive theory?

Point is, you have the right to have your own beliefs....this is America after all. Therefore even though a POTUS or any of his cabinet has the complete right to appoint any qualified person to positions they see fit...it's not wise to appoint people to positions where their views can ill affect public policy.

I agree with you, but if your going around saying that Hugo did a wonderful thing with the media in his country, where now he wants to shut down the ONLY station that opposes him, to me that implies that if your media aganist the adminstration the "diversity" czar will shut you down. That's just what I am taking away from the statement that Lloyd made.

What do NeoCon's have to do with Mark Lloyd? I might be missing the connection.

 

[Hot Mega]

So how come Obama would not go on Fox this past Sunday? Is he worried about them asking tough questions instead of asking about his White Sox and their chances of making the playoffs.

I'm thinking he probably has better things to do for one. Secondly, if I'm Obama...fuck Fox. Why should he give them the time of day when their network is committed to undermining him at every turn??

He'd make a better, more productive use of his time convincing talking to Ahmadinejad about accepting Israel than trying get through to anyone at Fox or the yokels in their viewership.

 

[Hot Mega]

I agree with you, but if your going around saying that Hugo did a wonderful thing with the media in his country, where now he wants to shut down the ONLY station that opposes him, to me that implies that if your talking aganist the adminstration the "diversity" czar will shut you down. That's just what I am taking away from the statement that Lloyd made.

Good point. However, he's not in a position to make law and there's this little thing called the US Constitution along with his bosses who stand in his way.

The POTUS couldn't even come close to doing what you're suggesting and certainly not some administrator at some government agency.

 

[jasonk282]

Good point. However, he's not in a position to make law and there's this little thing called the US Constitution along with his bosses who stand in his way.

The POTUS couldn't even come close to doing what you're suggesting and certainly not some administrator at some government agency.

Only time will tell I guess.

 

[Baill Inneraora]

I've never noticed a preachy tone at all. All I have noticed about the guy is how he is the one with valid questions that the "mainstream" media are not asking. He is the guy pointing out how SEIU, ACORN, and others are linked in a disturbing web that leads all the way back to the Holy Anointed One.

I think the guy is passionate about this country, and the way it was intended to be.....not the shadow of its former self that it is becoming.

Just my :2 cents:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

What a maroon.

 

[BlueBalls]

People do know that the term "Czar" is derived from the Latin word "Caesar" and is most commonly used to describe a supreme leader, Emperor or King of some sort (mainly in eastern Europe) and has nothing to do with socialism, don't they? No one can be that stupid. Unless of course they mean they and their group of rag-tag Marxist/socialist radicals is going to overthrow them in some fashion?

But that would be a reversal of roles now wouldn't it....

I know of its modern use but come on, if people are going to continue to push the "socialism" banner in everyone’s face it would be wise to not to continue to use a phrase which has historically the complete opposite meaning which contradicts their position.

 

[verticalsmile]

the more emphasis they put on 'diversity' - putting that kinda stuff in the spotlight, the more it seems alien and less appealing. Allow people to just get on with each other...all this politically correct bollocks just incites some kinda reverse-racism...its so bad its gotten to the point you cant even use the word 'black' to describe anything anymore for fear it might offend people - the irony is it usually offends some loony-left stupid white person as most black people dont give a shit. leave it all the fuck alone and concentrate on stuff that needs work - like lowering taxes and improving quality of life for EVERYONE.